Chinatownballer

I didn't know about those turnover numbers for the two of them. I guess i see your point having Crawford start. Also i guess one could argue that if Crawford starts he can try to get going early so as to get confidence which he needs to make big plays down the stretch. Nice arguing Penny. You convinced me i guess lol. I still dunno about JC's ability to really score inside but then again he's developing. The only thing i guess i would miss w/Q on the bench is his rebounding hustle. But then again it shouldn't be a sg's responsibility in the first place to get rebounds, our big men should be doing that.

majew16

if those stats are true than i take back what i said in the other thread. though when i listnen t games other than last night it feels that hes always turning it ove a nd taking bad shot,though i get the same feeling with nate and marbury

alphadog

Yes...JC is better. Yes, his FTs are up and his decisions are improved but the guy is still inconsistent. He was great in Seattle (although all of you should realize that everyone with skills has those games occassionally) but horrible in Clipperland. He still shows low ball IQ..same as Marbury. I admit these guys have gotten better but the truth is that they have SO much farther to go. How many bad decisions do you see great teams making down the stretch? That is where this team is especially vulnerable...decision making.