 |
|
12-08-2005, 05:03 AM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
|
BasketballBoards Player
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 981
|
Relax, dude
Frye would not have had a big game against Brand. He would have had his butt on the bench with fouls. The reason we lost was the guard play. 10-44 ain't gonna get it done anywhere, anytime. Marbury, JC, and Nate all sucked. Marbury did not play like a leader when it counted, and as most of you know, that is one of my biggest complaints. JC was great, huh Penny? Like I said....he can shoot you into a game or out of a game. His shot selection was.... er....a bit on the rancid side. And anyone who blames Curry in any way for this should be not allowed to watch games. The only reason we were even in this game was because of him. I'm sure it wasn't his idea to stop pounding theball inside...the guy was a monster.
Guards lost it.
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
12-08-2005, 09:01 AM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
|
Star
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Queens, NY
Age: 20
Posts: 4,226
|
Re: Knicks vs Clippers: Dec 7, 2005
jamal didnt have a great scoring night, yet he still took 7 free throws. his shot selection was not bad. he was missing easy 17 foot J's.
marbury sucked
|
|
|
12-08-2005, 10:47 AM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
|
BasketballBoards Player
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 981
|
Wrong, my friend...
His shot selection was not good at all. He took a few shots early in the clock, and several off one on one moves. The more he struggled, the more his judgement faltered. He is what he is......
|
|
|
12-08-2005, 01:17 PM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
|
Basketballboards Benchwarmer
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 227
|
Re: Wrong, my friend...
hey alphadog if channing frye dropped 21 vs the wallace's in detroit than he can do it against brand, LB just didnt play him.
__________________
San Francisco 49ers
Houston Rockets
Boston Red Sox
Michigan Wolverines Football
Georgetown Hoyas Basketball
New York Rangers
|
|
|
12-08-2005, 01:29 PM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
|
BasketballBoards Player
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Queens, New York
Age: 14
Posts: 555
|
Re: Knicks vs Clippers: Dec 7, 2005
He didnt even play alot yesterday, larry thought he was a mediocre matchup for brand
__________________
<DeY CaLL Me BiG_Deuce or BIG>
The name is Christian and im reppin for the youngins.......... im 12 and the new generation of sports so look out for me
"Dis aint a rap song dis is my life" Young Jeezy
RAp rEcOrd:1-6
Shoutouts to kitty, gotham2krazy, truknicksfan, knicks, yanks, jets, and rangers cuz dey still doin dey thing
Larry Brown is old, Zeke is dumb, crawford's a scorer,
taylor's a bum, udoka is new, Jerome James an eater,
woods is athletic, stephon's not a good leader
eddy curry sweats, but still works hard
nate robinson's good, but isnt a real point guard...
lee's underrated, rose is expiring, malik rose is dying, jackie is working hard, and frye is the best, the knicks need to get q off their chest.......
|
|
|
12-08-2005, 02:23 PM
|
#21 (permalink)
|
|
BasketballBoards Player
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 981
|
Listen, Rockets....
No doubt he can score when on the floor but he is not a great rebounder yet, nor is he a great defender. He would have given up lots of baskets and been in foul trouble on the bench trying tom guard Brand, who was aggressive offensively. The Wallaces were not agressive on the offensive end and therefore there was no defensive matchup or foul problems. It wasn't LB or the frontline my young Jedi friend, it was the guards...all of them.
|
|
|
12-08-2005, 04:03 PM
|
#22 (permalink)
|
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 27
|
Re: Knicks vs Clippers: Dec 7, 2005
Brand made his season averages in points (24), rebounds (11) and minutes played (40).
Frye has been averaging 15 points and 5.8 rebounds in 26 minutes. Yesterday in 17 minutes, he got 6 points on 3 for 4 shooting and 6 rebounds.
I understand the idea that the guards cost the Knicks the game but given the numbers do you guys really think it would have been that much worse if Frye had played his normal amount of time?
|
|
|
12-08-2005, 04:03 PM
|
#23 (permalink)
|
|
Basketballboards Benchwarmer
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 149
|
Re: Knicks vs Clippers: Dec 7, 2005
We need a real shooting guard who is ego-less and will take the shots that are given to him and make them consistently. We thought Q would be that guy when we traded for him but so far he hasn't been in it. Crawford is more of a combo guard than a sg and Marbury is also more of a combo guard than a point guard. This could work out if Marbury would just pass the ball when playing the point and shoot at sg and same w/Crawford. I think our players might be able to fill those roles but they also might not. It remains to be seen whether Steph can really play sg against taller defenders and also whether anyone can play pg reliably for us. I hate to use the cliche but we are definately a "work in progress."
|
|
|
12-09-2005, 07:59 AM
|
#24 (permalink)
|
|
BasketballBoards Player
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 981
|
Crawford...
would be GREAT, not good, off the bench. If he has it going, nobody can slow him easily. But if he doesn't, he can sit again. Regardless of Penny's thoughts, the guy is still inconsistent. If you want to see consistent shooting, look at Frye. Same thing every night. JC and Marbury are all over the place....25% one night, 60% the next. How can you have a game plan with that stuff?
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|