 |
|
11-29-2007, 07:19 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Player
Join Date: Jul 2006
Age: 52
Posts: 911
|
Time to evaluate Thomas' job performance
Time to cut the crap about this team and tell it like it really is so we can move on. IT's centerpiece trades:
Marbury= total loser and a terminal cancer
Curry= soft scorer...period
Zach= non-passing, non-defending, humongous black hole
JC= the invisible man
NOT A WINNER IN THE BUNCH
Biggest game of the year on national TV and this is what NY fans get? What we deserve? I've been watching since 1968 and I can NEVER remember such a soft team so willing to meekly surrender. Give me Ray Williams and Kenny Bannister any day. If Dolan doesn't fire IT tomorrow, this season is toast. Wouldn't be surprised if Stern starts pressuring Dolan to sell.
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
11-29-2007, 07:23 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Sexy Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 11,452
|
Re: Time to evaluate Thomas' job performance
Good thread Dog, rumor has it Stern already asked Dolan's dad to do something about it, and he said he has better things to do. Right now Dolan isn't going anywhere, he will go down as one of the worst sports owners in history. As for IT, don't hold your breath I don't think he is getting fired after tonight. Dolan is thinking about 2 things: He owes him 20 million dollars, and that sexual harrassment suit is pending an appeal. As for your list of players, out of the 5 I still think Zach is pretty damn good, but his overall weakness is his defense and lack of hustle.
__________________
Everyone is entitled to be stupid, but some abuse the privilege.
PLEASE BEWARE THIS POSTER MAY GO ON THE DEEP END AT ANY GIVEN TIME. Use Caution!
|
|
|
|
|
11-29-2007, 07:26 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Cooler than Kevin
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: New York
Age: 29
Posts: 21,501
|
Re: Time to evaluate Thomas' job performance
Very easy to grade his performance. F overall, F in every sub-category. Did I miss anything?
|
|
|
|
|
11-29-2007, 07:29 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Star
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,999
|
Re: Time to evaluate Thomas' job performance
Quote:
Originally Posted by Krstic All Star
Very easy to grade his performance. F overall, F in every sub-category. Did I miss anything?
|
|
|
|
|
|
11-29-2007, 07:29 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Cooler than Kevin
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: New York
Age: 29
Posts: 21,501
|
Re: Time to evaluate Thomas' job performance
^ Didn't think so.
|
|
|
|
|
11-29-2007, 07:30 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Player
Join Date: Jul 2006
Age: 52
Posts: 911
|
Re: Time to evaluate Thomas' job performance
Zach? Please, Kitty. Skilled scorer one on one. Killer of ball movement which causes players to lose interest and stand around. Good rebounder. Better off the bench. Definitely NOT a centerpiece.
|
|
|
|
|
11-29-2007, 07:30 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Curious One
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,115
|
Re: Time to evaluate Thomas' job performance
Quote:
Originally Posted by alphaorange
Time to cut the crap about this team and tell it like it really is so we can move on. IT's centerpiece trades:
Marbury= total loser and a terminal cancer
Curry= soft scorer...period
Zach= non-passing, non-defending, humongous black hole
JC= the invisible man
NOT A WINNER IN THE BUNCH
Biggest game of the year on national TV and this is what NY fans get? What we deserve? I've been watching since 1968 and I can NEVER remember such a soft team so willing to meekly surrender. Give me Ray Williams and Kenny Bannister any day. If Dolan doesn't fire IT tomorrow, this season is toast. Wouldn't be surprised if Stern starts pressuring Dolan to sell.
|
you know ... I really don't think the players are that bad. They need a new coach; new atmosphere; new motivation. They are not inspired and have no respect for leadership. People will say, with all of the money they're making they don't need motvation, the money is enough. This, to me, is being unrealistic --- no matter how much money they make they are still human beings with human feelings.
Bring in a new coach (which you can't do), and those same players would be completely different. I'm just sayimg ...
|
|
|
|
|
11-29-2007, 07:40 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Sexy Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 11,452
|
Re: Time to evaluate Thomas' job performance
Wrong again....I still like the deal for Zach, and I think he is probably one of the few bright spots out of that horrid starting lineup. Not everyone will be Kareem, or Wilt everyone has some aspects of their game that make you want to scream, but I still like what he brings regardless of his sorry performance on the other side of the ball.
__________________
Everyone is entitled to be stupid, but some abuse the privilege.
PLEASE BEWARE THIS POSTER MAY GO ON THE DEEP END AT ANY GIVEN TIME. Use Caution!
|
|
|
|
|
11-29-2007, 07:40 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Player
Join Date: Jul 2006
Age: 52
Posts: 911
|
And you're wrong...
Winners are born, not made. None of these guys have ever been winners....ever. Your view is wishful thinking. These players are also NOT good PLAYERS. They are good at doing CERTAIN things well. Compare:
Garnett to Curry/zach
Pierce to Qrich
JC to Allen
Marbury to Rondo
Each of these guys do MORE things well than their Knick counterpart.
|
|
|
|
|
11-29-2007, 08:19 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Jesus Shuttlesworth
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Age: 20
Posts: 9,775
|
Re: Time to evaluate Thomas' job performance
damn, yall turned on Randolph already??
|
|
|
|
|
11-29-2007, 08:45 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Legend
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Shoreline, WA
Age: 18
Posts: 15,554
|
Horse****
Quote:
Originally Posted by alphaorange
Winners are born, not made. None of these guys have ever been winners....ever. Your view is wishful thinking. These players are also NOT good PLAYERS. They are good at doing CERTAIN things well. Compare:
Garnett to Curry/zach
Pierce to Qrich
JC to Allen
Marbury to Rondo
Each of these guys do MORE things well than their Knick counterpart.
|
Winners aren't born, they're made. Ain't no baby ever held a championship trophy. All those guys, how many rings? The 'winners' and 'losers' is a load of bull. Teams win, not individuals. I'll take a 'loser' team of Nash, T-Mac, Lebron, Garnett, and Howard any day.
|
|
|
|
|
11-29-2007, 08:50 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
NY NY big city of dreams
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home of the Brave
Posts: 1,366
|
Re: Time to evaluate Thomas' job performance
Quote:
Originally Posted by alphaorange
Zach? Please, Kitty. Skilled scorer one on one. Killer of ball movement which causes players to lose interest and stand around. Good rebounder. Better off the bench. Definitely NOT a centerpiece.
|
i dont know alpha. The perfect player that your always looking for doesn't exist. and if he does how many championships has he won and how many teams have him.
i have a feeling that if kobe were a knick for all these years instead of a laker you'd be saying the same about him
__________________
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by charlz
NJ is for all the NY rejects
|
Im on my New York SH!!,
I Rep The Giants and Jets, New York Knicks
 <---yup,...its me
|
|
|
|
|
11-29-2007, 08:57 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
NY NY big city of dreams
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home of the Brave
Posts: 1,366
|
Re: Time to evaluate Thomas' job performance
wrong topic my bad....delete
__________________
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by charlz
NJ is for all the NY rejects
|
Im on my New York SH!!,
I Rep The Giants and Jets, New York Knicks
<---yup,...its me
|
|
|
|
|
11-29-2007, 09:27 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Sunny Orlando
Posts: 3,375
Rep Power: 2307313
| |
Time to evaluate Thomas' job performance
