seifer0406

I would trade both, build the team with David Lee at the PF and get an average defensive minded C either through the draft or trade.

Randolph is cancer and Curry can't rebound. Neither is good for long term in my opinion.

Vuchato

you could get rid of one if you take a bad contract back or throw in your pick. They should probably get rid of both, but Curry wouldn't look too bad next to a defensive, rebounding big. A three man rotation of Curry, Lee, and, say, Diop would be pretty solid, all three are young too.

EDIT: Curry's contract is actually pretty good, the Knicks could definitely move him if they wanted.

Tragedy

Throwing the pick is not an option. Neither is taking a bad contract.

__________________

Quote:

TJ Ford found his way back into the Raptors starting lineup, after presenting coach Sam Mitchell with a industrial-sized case of S-Curl texturizer. Jose Calderon came with Nu Nile, after being purposely misinformed by a giggling Anthony Parker. Gordon and Deng's strategy during contract negotiations should consist only of a picture of Kirk Hinrich and repeated utterances of the following: "C'mon, man! The ****!?!?" Paxon would crack. So, they're gonna miss the playoffs WITH Iverson? Listen, people, it's time you reevaluate just how good Iverson is and what he brings to a team.

Ruff Draft

I still have hope that Curry can turn things around.

Zach has more talent as of now, but he's not going anywhere else.

I'd chose to keep Zach, but I would miss Curry.

__________________
"It doesn't matter to me who we play, we have a job to do. We have a mission. They're going to be in the way."
-Rasheed Wallace



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

alphaorange

Zach puts in ZERO effort at anything other than offense. A lot of his rebounds are on the offensive end resulting in scoring ops. Black hole supreme. I get the feeling his teammates don't like playing with him, as well. Curry has the same basic scoring potential, is a willing, if not successful, passer, and had had good chemistry with Lee in the past. I get the feeling that BOTH will be gone if the chance presents itself.

Kiyaman

Marbury & Curry or Crawford & Zach?

With Marbury at the ending of his contract all of us Knick-fans are in luv with keeping Marbury for the entire season to end the $22 million he receive this season.
Curry & Marbury let Knick-fans see 40 games of Crawford & Zach.

Yes' It's obvious that Walsh biggest task this offseason is trading Zach, Q.Rich, Jefferies, and Crawford.
If the Knicks get the 5th or 6th pick should Walsh trade it to the Pacers for their 11th pick?
Along with Zach & Jefferies for J.O'Neal & Daniels?

That would be two down and two more to go.

Gotham2krazy

I'd choose for them both to go.

__________________
The Return to Mecca