Thread Tools

Display Modes

AllenIverson · 05-27-2004, 09:07 AM

Which one of these Pros is a better Basketball player?

Allen Iverson, of course take a look. Rookie of the year, M.V.P., led the league in scoring two times and of course look at the size of this man and his heart.

T-Mac, just a cross-eyed, short leg guy who needs some help.

Unlimitedgame · 05-27-2004, 09:11 AM

McGrady obviously. Anyone who shoots consistently under 40 % in my opinion is OVERATED

AllenIverson · 05-27-2004, 09:21 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Unlimitedgame!
McGrady obviously. Anyone who shoots consistently under 40 % in my opinion is OVERATED

Has T-Mac ever made it to the Finals, or won the MVP award????????

Unlimitedgame · 05-27-2004, 09:22 AM

Has Iverson ever shot above 40%

Steve Kerr has 4 Finals WINS, Does that make him better than AI?

**Coatesvillain** · 05-27-2004, 06:48 PM

There's no doubt McGrady is the better player, not only that, but Iverson is anywhere from four to five years older and he is headed towards the downside of his career. McGrady on the other hand is just entering his prime.

**BEEZ** · 05-27-2004, 08:06 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Unlimitedgame!
McGrady obviously. Anyone who shoots consistently under 40 % in my opinion is OVERATED

Must be hard watching Jamal Crawford then. MCgrady is better at this point but being that Iverson has never shot under 40% Im not certain who you are talking about

**RoyWilliams** · 05-27-2004, 10:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Unlimitedgame!
Has Iverson ever shot above 40%

I dont know, you tell me.

Looks to me only two years where he shot below 40%.

Unlimitedgame · 05-28-2004, 12:00 AM

LOL So his career average is 41% He has two years of sub40% shooting including last years horrible 38%. Anything under 45% is pretty ****ty

**BEEZ** · 05-28-2004, 05:12 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Unlimitedgame!
LOL So his career average is 41% He has two years of sub40% shooting including last years horrible 38%. Anything under 45% is pretty ****ty

Noted that most guards dont shoot 45% anymore where TMAC was the exception. Kobe, Tmac, JKidd. all of the shot below 45. So I guess they arent too good huh

Unlimitedgame · 05-28-2004, 05:18 AM

Everybody knows that Jason kidd cannot shoot. He is horrible. Kobe had an off year this year but every year since his 3rd year in the league he has been at or above 46%. He is also at 45 for his career. MJ was at 50% for his career. **** even Wally Z is close to the 50% clip. AI is always barely above 40. AND IF you shoot UNDER 40%!!! Like AI's 38% this year? That is straight crap.

**BEEZ** · 05-28-2004, 05:19 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Unlimitedgame!
Everybody knows that Jason kidd cannot shoot. He is horrible. Kobe had an off year this year but every year since his 3rd year in the league he has been at or above 46%. He is also at 45 for his career. MJ was at 50% for his career. **** even Wally Z is close to the 50% clip. AI is always barely above 40. AND IF you shoot UNDER 40%!!! Like AI's 38% this year? That is straight crap.

Wow so I guess Kirk Hinrich and Jamal Crawford are horrible as well correct

Unlimitedgame · 05-28-2004, 05:20 AM

Pretty much under 45 is not that great but when your hovering at a flat 40%?! That is terrible shooting %. You need to question your shot selection then.

darkballa · 05-28-2004, 06:29 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Unlimitedgame!
Everybody knows that Jason kidd cannot shoot. He is horrible. Kobe had an off year this year but every year since his 3rd year in the league he has been at or above 46%. He is also at 45 for his career. MJ was at 50% for his career. **** even Wally Z is close to the 50% clip. AI is always barely above 40. AND IF you shoot UNDER 40%!!! Like AI's 38% this year? That is straight crap.

Numbers dont matter as long as you give what the team needs. Bring leadership? OK tell youre teammates to get off their lazy ### and play some defense. Scoring? sure couple of lay-upas couple of assists, Number's arent anywhere lose than how important he was since he came to the sixers.

Unlimitedgame · 05-28-2004, 06:40 AM

Hienrich and Crawfords fg % was terrible too. Look at the Bulls recored. Im not gonna take thier side because they are bulls. I am a realist. Jason kidd compensates for his lack of shooting ability with his playmaking ability, he also does not shoot so much that it hurts the team with his poor fg%.

**BEEZ** · 05-28-2004, 06:41 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Unlimitedgame!
Hienrich and Crawfords fg % was terrible too. Look at the Bulls recored. Im not gonna take thier side because they are bulls. I am a realist. Jason kidd compensates for his lack of shooting ability with his playmaking ability, he also does not shoot so much that it hurts the team with his poor fg%.

He avg 19 FGA per game. Thats not alot

Thread Tools Display Modes

Thread Tools

Display Modes