 |
01-21-2004, 05:18 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Star
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: São Bernardo, SP, Brasil
Age: 24
Posts: 2,910
|
Googs for Clark?
David Aldridge writed about a possible trade involving Suns and Jazz...
It's Googs for Clark.
Clark fit well in Phoenix?
__________________
Thrilled to reach the 2900th post! Coming with a lot more of great trade ideas (the most beloved ones in this board), you can expect that!
Thanks to all members of this site, you guys are great.
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
01-21-2004, 09:00 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
BasketballBoards Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Arizona
Age: 21
Posts: 1,881
|
I dont think so, Clark is exactly like Donnel Harvey, plus it ruins are plan for more cap room next year. I dont like that trade, trading googs for secound round pick would be good.
__________________
"Doomed to crumble, unless we grow" Tool
"Cant seem to recognize
That stare behind those eyes
Who is this man I see?
Whos looking back at me?
Cant focus through the grey
And I am fading into nothing
The reflection must get clearer" Flaw
|
|
|
01-21-2004, 09:23 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
27/6/3 inc
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,775
|
Huh? Clark is way better than Harvey, but he's going to be out till February. Clark is one of the best shotblockers in the NBA, but if this trade went down it would be purely financial, Clark wouldn't be part of Phoenix's future plans..
And if Utah takes Googs, then Phoenix is going to have to send a future first rounder with him. There's no way Utah just swallows 11 mill for nothing. Googs is not a contributor anymore.
I would rather see Phoenix work to unload Jahidi or Eisley, but if they really want the money then they'll ship Googs.
|
|
|
01-21-2004, 09:53 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
BasketballBoards Player
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Florianopolis - SC, Brazil
Posts: 720
Rep Power: 6
|
Quote:
Originally posted by <b>Sovereignz</b>!
There's no way Utah just swallows 11 mill for nothing.
|
The Jazz would be getting everything they need, a player.
__________________
and the sublime style is still straight from Floripa
|
|
|
01-21-2004, 10:03 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
27/6/3 inc
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,775
|
Umm.. Googs makes 11 million to average 2ppg on 30% shooting. I don't think he's what anyone needs, quite frankly.
Phoenix isn't going to unload Googs to Utah unless they include a first rounder, mark my words.
|
|
|
01-21-2004, 10:15 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Star
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: São Bernardo, SP, Brasil
Age: 24
Posts: 2,910
|
Quote:
Originally posted by <b>Sovereignz</b>!
Umm.. Googs makes 11 million to average 2ppg on 30% shooting. I don't think he's what anyone needs, quite frankly.
Phoenix isn't going to unload Googs to Utah unless they include a first rounder, mark my words.
|
Or two second-rounders...
__________________
Thrilled to reach the 2900th post! Coming with a lot more of great trade ideas (the most beloved ones in this board), you can expect that!
Thanks to all members of this site, you guys are great.
|
|
|
01-21-2004, 10:45 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Shooters!!!
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,612
|
I wont do this trade.
Clark is a tremendous athlete and a great shot blocker but he may hinder Amare's progress in the long run.
Googs will offer 11 Million in cap room space, Suns need that to attract stars. Jahidi and Eisley, as Sovereigns stated, are the two main contracts we MUST get rid of.
|
|
|
01-22-2004, 04:32 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
they paid for the suits
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Vegas
Age: 26
Posts: 6,580
|
I really wouldn't mind this trade. I don't think people realize how athletic Keon is. I think he would be a perfect C for the Suns to run with. Maybe not the long-term solution, but would be a huge upgrade at C.
__________________
Teezy's GM Draft:
Lineup: Chris Paul/Manu Ginobili/Loul Deng/Dirk Nowitzki/Pau Gasol
Bench: Shaun Livingston/Gerald Green/Marvin Williams/Al Jefferson/Sam Dalembert
|
|
|
01-22-2004, 02:18 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
27/6/3 inc
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,775
|
Quote:
Originally posted by <b>RebelSun</b>!
I really wouldn't mind this trade. I don't think people realize how athletic Keon is. I think he would be a perfect C for the Suns to run with. Maybe not the long-term solution, but would be a huge upgrade at C.
|
I would expect nothing less from a UNLV fan  . But I agree, Keon is a premier shot blocker in the NBA, when healthy.. He has a huge vertical and extremely long arms, and in 2001 (the last time he got good minutes), he averaged 11.3ppg and 7.4rpg in only 27mpg.. but seeing as how his contract is expiring and I doubt Phoenix is really trying to get good this year, getting him might not be so great..
|
|
|
01-22-2004, 02:21 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
BasketballBoards Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 72
Rep Power: 6
|
What is Keon's current salary?
|
|
|
01-22-2004, 06:39 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
they paid for the suits
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Vegas
Age: 26
Posts: 6,580
|
Quote:
Originally posted by <b>Sovereignz</b>!
I would expect nothing less from a UNLV fan .
|
Maybe a little  , but I really wouldn't mind. I think the Suns showed interest when he was in Toronto. Keon is a freak athletically. I wonder if the Jazz would do this.
__________________
Teezy's GM Draft:
Lineup: Chris Paul/Manu Ginobili/Loul Deng/Dirk Nowitzki/Pau Gasol
Bench: Shaun Livingston/Gerald Green/Marvin Williams/Al Jefferson/Sam Dalembert
|
|
|
01-22-2004, 08:56 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
27/6/3 inc
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,775
|
Quote:
Originally posted by <b>Chasemeifucan</b>!
What is Keon's current salary?
|
Clark is making ~5 million this year.
|
|
|
01-22-2004, 10:07 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
BasketballBoards Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Phoenix AZ
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 0
|
From what i've heard were gonna do what we did to jackson. Cut him
|
|
|
 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|