 |
07-07-2004, 03:07 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Player Salary Geek
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Age: 42
Posts: 4,380
Rep Power: 255836
|
So Cal's Crazy Trade Idea #31786
PORTLAND sends Shareef Abdur-Rahim to Los Angeles
PORTLAND sends Derek Anderson, Sergei Monia and Vladimir Stepania to Toronto
PORTLAND sends Damon Stoudamire to New York
PORTLAND receives Vince Carter, Alvin Williams, Jerome Moiso and Anfernee Hardaway
TORONTO sends Vince Carter, Alvin Williams and Jerome Moiso to Portland
TORONTO sends Roger Mason, Jr. to New York
TORONTO receives Stephon Marbury, Derek Anderson, Sergei Monia and Vladimir Stepania
LOS ANGELES sends Shaquille O'Neal to New York
LOS ANGELES receives Shareef Abdur-Rahim, Nazr Mohammed, Mike Sweetney, Frank Williams and Othella Harrington
NEW YORK sends Stephon Marbury to Toronto
NEW YORK sends Nazr Mohammed, Mike Sweetney, Frank Williams and Othella Harrington to Los Angeles
NEW YORK sends Anfernee Hardaway to Portland
NEW YORK receives Shaquille O'Neal, Damon Stoudamire and Roger Mason, Jr.
----------
RATIONALE:
Portland exchanges SAR, Damon and Monia for Carter and Williams. Williams starts until Telfair is ready, then becomes an overpaid backup - but he's the price to be paid in order to get Carter. Anderson's lousy contract exchanged for Hardaway's (shorter but bigger) lousy contract. Stepania exchanged for Moiso.
If Toronto finds that it needs to trade Carter and wants to get a star back in exchange, this is an option. Marbury is exciting and can help keep people in the seats. Anderson replaces Carter in the starting lineup, playing next to Rose with Monia as the future. Obtaining Stepania gives them help at center, especially if Araujo falters a bit in his rookie year. Mason is simply filler.
New York gets the big man they have lacked since Ewing left town - a player who will be more dominant in the East than he was in the West this year. They exchange Hardaway's bloated deal for Stoudamire's bloated, but expiring, deal. Damon also takes over at starting PG to replace Marbury. They have the depth up front to lose Mohammed, Sweetney and Harrington. They will miss Marbury but will be IMO a better team with Shaq. Maybe even a more popular team with the NY fans (they love their centers, don't they?)
Los Angeles gets, well, less than market value for Shaq. But this might be as good as it gets. It's simply tough to match contracts for the $27.7 million that Shaq will make. They literally have no front court other than Shaq today. After this trade, they have 2 PF's and 2 C's. They only have Payton at PG today, after this trade they might have their PG of the future in Williams. But mostly, the trade opens the door for the Lakers to be Kobe's team. I don't think he'll re-sign with LA until Shaq is traded. And both SAR and Harrington have expiring contracts, giving them options for next summer. And if Sweetney and Williams become good players with more playing time....
Oh, and if it's more palatable to the Lakers, Mutombo can replace Harrington and the trade still works under cap rules. He also essentially has an expiring contract (team option in 2005-06).
----------
OK, it's late and my brain might or might not be functioning at full capacity. Let the responses fly.....
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
07-07-2004, 03:13 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
commie pinko
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: with the supermodels
Posts: 6,411
|
Actually makes a lot of sense to me - but a 16 player trade makes it less than likely.
I'm not crazy about it from Portland's perspective - I'm not sure I want Carter. But I can see where others - including Nash - might.
barfo
|
|
|
07-07-2004, 04:19 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Player
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Hot ATLanta home of ludacris, Monica, Outkast, lil jon, SoSo def, Jermaine Duprie,Youngbloodz, T.I.
Posts: 540
Rep Power: 6
|
this thread is proof that this is gonna be a long summer
Nice work So cal I like it
__________________
If you're mad that I'm on top, then wish me gone. If you're mad I'm on the road, then wish me home. But if you're mad that I'm right punk wish me wrong. But after three wishes, BLOW IT OUT YA ***
-Ludacris
|
|
|
07-07-2004, 04:57 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Player
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 826
|
I'd rather see Khyrapa traded than Monia. Monia can play 2G and some SF. Khyrapa is apparently a dedicated 3 -- and we already have Darius there. Monia would be a good backup for both positions --and is the better outside shooter by all accounts.
But losing DA and Damon sounds rather excellent to me, even if I am not the biggest Carter fan. All else being equal, I'd rather trade for Marbury and go with QRich or similar on the free market.
Good work, though!
|
|
|
07-07-2004, 08:35 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Just looking
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Salem, OR
Age: 47
Posts: 11,878
Rep Power: 416051
|
nice work SCBF, but I think there are better ways to get Carter and Alvin
besides moving Shaq in this deal, it puts LA in direct FA competition with us next year. Setting aside the usual arguments of whether we, nor they will actually renounce players to get there, and be well under the cap to pursue anyone of consequence... Ray Allen perhaps?
I would also rather keep Monia than Khrayapa for the same reasons as stated above.... Damon, DA.. 
__________________
"The whole is greater than the sum of its parts..."
Heart, desire and hustle! Its the fire within that makes a champion.
|
|
|
07-07-2004, 10:16 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Portland
Age: 36
Posts: 1,386
|
Sorry SCBF but the Lakers don't receive enough in this trade to justify shipping Shaq. SAR & role players isn't going to get Shaq. The only way LA will trade Shaq if for multiple very good players (ie, Nowitzki + Finley or Webber + Bibby) MitchK. isn't going to let Shaq walk just because he says he wants out unless he is fairly compensated (if there even is a fair trade for Shaq) A lot of players demand trades and nothing happens. There are only a few teams that even have enough parts to trade for Shaq. Even if you do a multiple team trade, the Knicks just don't have enough juice to land Shaq.
__________________
Big Kaydow
|
|
|
07-07-2004, 11:56 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Player Salary Geek
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Age: 42
Posts: 4,380
Rep Power: 255836
|
Thanks for all your responses!
Quote:
Originally posted by <b>barfo</b>
Actually makes a lot of sense to me - but a 16 player trade makes it less than likely.
|
Thus the title of "Crazy Trade Idea"
Quote:
Originally posted by <b>KIDBLAZE</b>
this thread is proof that this is gonna be a long summer
|
But will it be a "cruel summer"?????
Quote:
Originally posted by <b>Iwatas</b>
I'd rather see Khyrapa traded than Monia.
|
Good idea. I was just going off the reports that the Blazers were higher on Victor than Sergei. And the final grasps of hope that Qyntel can step up and fill the backup SG responsibilities starting this year.
Quote:
Originally posted by <b>Trader Bob</b>
it puts LA in direct FA competition with us next year.
|
I honestly didn't think about that. But, yes, it potentially puts the Lakers into FA bidders next summer while taking the Blazers completely out of that picture.
Quote:
Originally posted by <b>kaydow</b>
the Lakers don't receive enough in this trade to justify shipping Shaq.
|
No, as I mentioned in my post, it doesn't bring back "equal value". It does, however, give the Lakers a decent front line. I don't think, though, that the Lakers will find ANY deal that gives them equal value. At that point, if they feel that trading Shaq is the only way to retain Kobe, Buss will probably order Kupchak to make the best deal possible. And, as Trader Bob points out, this deal even gives the Lakers the option of entering the 2005 FA market.
|
|
|
07-07-2004, 01:20 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Star
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: *3rd* most dangerous city in America
Posts: 3,030
|
How about a slightly smaller deal:
Portland trades:
PF Shareef Abdur-Rahim (to Seattle)
C Dale Davis (to Toronto)
Seattle trades:
SF Rashard Lewis (to Toronto)
C Calvin Booth (to Portland)
Toronto trades:
SF Vince Carter (to Portland)
PG Alvin Williams (to Portland)
TRADE ACCEPTED
Portland gets Carter, Williams and Booth
Seattle gets SAR, minutes for Radmanovic at SF and rid of Booth's horrible contract
Toronto gets Lewis and Dale (expiring contract), and ditches Alvin's contract.
Seeing what happened to Orlando's GM after trading McGrady, I think Babcock might worry about this one, though...
|
|
|
07-07-2004, 01:43 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Just looking
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Salem, OR
Age: 47
Posts: 11,878
Rep Power: 416051
|
I was thinking along these lines
Quote:
Originally posted by <b>Trader Bob</b>!
Portland sends:
Rahim $13.5 mil + Patterson $5.4 mil + Dickau $0.8 mil = $19.7 mil OUT
Toronto sends:
Carter $11.3 mil + Alviin Williams $5.5 mil = $16.8 mil OUT + some filler
Toronto can play Dickau at PG, Rose at SG, Marshall at SF, and Rahim at PF
Toronto gets rid of injury prone Williams
Portland gets a SG in Carter and backup PG
PG Damon, Williams, Cook
SG Carter, DA
SF Miles, Woods
PF Randolph, Outlaw
C Ratliff, Davis, Stepania
+ 2-3x 2004 draft picks
thoughts?
Is that enough incentive to get Carter?
|
__________________
"The whole is greater than the sum of its parts..."
Heart, desire and hustle! Its the fire within that makes a champion.
|
|
|
07-07-2004, 02:15 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Player Salary Geek
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Age: 42
Posts: 4,380
Rep Power: 255836
|
Trader Bob -
The new Toronto brass has all but said that any trade for Carter would have to return someone with enough star power to keep the fans coming in. SAR does not have that, IMO.
Also, I think they'd like to continue to give Bosh time to develop at PF, not bring in someone who will take time away from him.
|
|
|
07-07-2004, 03:25 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Legend
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 16,001
|
The Raptors committed like $29m to Rafer Alston. While Marbury is infinitely better, they can't really take on a big contract PG with Rafer on board...
Ed O.
__________________
"In the end, it all comes down to talent. You can talk all you want about intangibles, I just don't know what that means. Talent makes winners, not intangibles. Can nice guys win? Sure, nice guys can win -- if they're nice guys with a lot of talent. Nice guys with a little talent finish fourth, and nice guys with no talent finish last."
-- Sandy Koufax
|
|
|
 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|