 |
|
11-01-2004, 11:46 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Banned Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Bristol, CT Home of ESPN
Age: 31
Posts: 1,546
|
Why doesnt nash just pull the trigger for Wally and get rid of SAR?
This is just ridiculous at this point....WE NEED A DANS SHOOTER and already have a great pair of Small Forwards without SAr in Miles and patterson!
I know Wally has a ugly contarct but we wont get a star Sg anyway so why trade for wally is a solid palyer when healthy!
This lineup would without question make the palyoffs!
Damon/Van Exel
Wally/DA/Frahm
Miles/Patterson
Zach/he plays 40 minutes a game anyhow! im sure we can find someone!
Theo/Pryzbilla/Stiffpania
thast a solid lineup!
bottom line is we will trade sar but i just hope it happens soon.
Who do you think we end up getting for him?
Wally
Kidd
Carter
none of the above.....please add a name. 
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
11-01-2004, 11:55 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Star
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,320
|
Several reasons why Nash hasn't "pulled the trigger":
1. The "gun isn't loaded"... meaning that the deal isn't on the table. Just because there are internet rumors doesn't mean that the T'Wolves want to do the deal. Given their current contract problems with Spree, they may not be thrilled at giving up a viable replacement for him.
2. The Blazers and T'Wolves may not be on the same page as to what players get added into the package to make the numbers match. Kandi or Johnson are the likely candidates, but the T'Wolves may not want to deplete their center position.
3. Nash may not be all that thrilled with Wally and is looking for a better deal. If SAR can showcase this fall and prove that he's still got All-Star credentials, Nash may get Kidd or another player with bigger impact than Wally.
I'm sure that there are other possible reasons as well.
Patience, grasshopper.
__________________
Blazermania is BACK!!!
Last edited by e_blazer1 : 11-01-2004 at 12:23 PM.
|
|
|
11-01-2004, 12:03 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Just looking
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Salem, OR
Age: 47
Posts: 11,878
Rep Power: 416051
|
I totally agree
If it boiled down to Wally, I would rather get Eddie Jones from Miami. EJ can play D
Wally is known to not get along with players, and has injury problems, and does not know the word defense.
I am just not wanting Wally, Kidd, Sprewell, Houston or others right now.... not at all
Give me EJ... he can shoot and play D. I will resign to taking him for Rahim right now
After signing Zach to that poison pill extension, Rahim has to be traded by February now. Dropping his payroll does no good on a bloated team salary.
__________________
"The whole is greater than the sum of its parts..."
Heart, desire and hustle! Its the fire within that makes a champion.
Last edited by Trader Ed : 11-01-2004 at 12:14 PM.
|
|
|
11-01-2004, 12:06 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
All-Star
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Hillsborough, CA
Age: 35
Posts: 9,989
|
the player in last year contract does not have much trade value.
same as bad contract.
__________________
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Sad Mafioso
Unbelievably cruel, utterly offensive, absolutely deplorable, yet strikingly humorous!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by afobisme
Ballscientist is using something more powerful than any other human or computer - his brain.
|
|
|
|
11-01-2004, 12:11 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Just looking
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Salem, OR
Age: 47
Posts: 11,878
Rep Power: 416051
|
Thats not true at all. an expiring contract (which Damon, Rahim, Q and Stepania have) does indeed have value to teams which want to get rid of long term deals. It gives them immediate cap relief at the end of hte year. Possibly putting them in contention for hte FA market or to eliminate possible luxury tax
for the right team it works wonders
__________________
"The whole is greater than the sum of its parts..."
Heart, desire and hustle! Its the fire within that makes a champion.
|
|
|
11-01-2004, 12:11 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Star
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,320
|
Quote:
the player in last year contract does not have much trade value.
same as bad contract.
|
Actually, the opposite is generally true. Teams looking to get under the cap or luxury tax look for expiring contracts. NJ would love to dump Kidd's longterm max contract by taking back an expiring one. It's just a matter of them wanting the best expiring contract in return.
__________________
Blazermania is BACK!!!
|
|
|
11-01-2004, 12:12 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Player
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tualatin, OR
Posts: 670
Rep Power: 6
|
Regardless of contract issues, Wally is a SF, not a SG. Although he's a great shooter, he's not quick enough to play the SG position...offensively or defensively. We have enough options at the SF position as it is. We do need some quality outside shooting on this team, we just need it to come more from the SG position.
__________________
Go Blazers...and anyone playing the Lakers.
The Blazers are like a box of chocolates...you never know what you're going to get.
|
|
|
11-01-2004, 12:13 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Star
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,320
|
Quote:
|
Regardless of contract issues, Wally is a SF, not a SG. Although he's a great shooter, he's not quick enough to play the SG position...offensively or defensively.
|
Interesting theory given that he was an All-Star as a 2G a couple of years ago.
__________________
Blazermania is BACK!!!
|
|
|
11-01-2004, 12:14 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Just looking
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Salem, OR
Age: 47
Posts: 11,878
Rep Power: 416051
|
Rahim expiring at $14.6 mil
Wally 5 years $55 mil = $9, $10, $11, $12, $13 mil
Eddie Jones 3 years = $13.4 mil, player option $14.6 mil, $15.7 mil
Give me EJ at those prices and term
__________________
"The whole is greater than the sum of its parts..."
Heart, desire and hustle! Its the fire within that makes a champion.
|
|
|
11-01-2004, 12:19 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Star
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,320
|
Quote:
|
Give me EJ at those prices and term
|
Agreed, but I don't think that Miami can afford to lose EJ from their backcourt without getting another player in addition to SAR. How about packaging Q with him?
__________________
Blazermania is BACK!!!
|
|
|
11-01-2004, 05:38 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Steal of the Draft
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Oregon
Age: 18
Posts: 8,021
|
I actually think that Miami could afford to do that. They 1 get rid of Ej's pretty bad contract. Also they have two options start Person and actually give Dorrell Wright some time(this kid is the next T-Mac mark my words) or start Damon Jones at the 1 and move Wade to the 2, which is where he played in college. so if they had Wade at the two their lineup would look like this:
D.Jones/Wade/R.Butler/SAR/Shaq
Thats really really really good for an East team.
I think Miami would do that.
BFreak.
|
|
|
11-01-2004, 05:49 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
Legend
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 16,001
|
Eddie is 33 and, as Trader Bob laid out, the possessor of one bad contract. He can still play, for sure, but nowhere near $44m over 3 years.
Eddie's not a big upgrade over DA and his contract is simply horrible. I would rather have Wally at two additional years for $11m more than Jones.
I might not go so far as to say that I'd prefer letting SAR walk to taking on Jones, but I'd have to think about it.
Ed O.
__________________
"In the end, it all comes down to talent. You can talk all you want about intangibles, I just don't know what that means. Talent makes winners, not intangibles. Can nice guys win? Sure, nice guys can win -- if they're nice guys with a lot of talent. Nice guys with a little talent finish fourth, and nice guys with no talent finish last."
-- Sandy Koufax
|
|
|
11-02-2004, 01:01 AM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
Star
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Portland Oregon
Age: 40
Posts: 4,072
|
This just in: A player's been found that Ed is even less interested in the Blazers attaining than Wally!
Joking aside, I am curious to hear your logic, Ed. Those of us who keep up with such things know you've been (rightfully, to my mind) on something of a soapbox for keeping Wally out of Portland, citing such things as lack of defense, questionable health, suspect team chemistry, and huuuge contract. Eddie seems more attractive to me on each of those fronts. Sure he's a better shooter over his career but....
I'd love to hear you expand as you have the time and inclination.
|
|
|
11-02-2004, 01:23 AM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
Just looking
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Salem, OR
Age: 47
Posts: 11,878
Rep Power: 416051
|
Much like NVE...
Eddie Jones also has a player option for next year. While there has been rumblings NVE may opt out this summer. I have no idea what EJ may do next summer.
Potentially both are expiring contracts.
__________________
"The whole is greater than the sum of its parts..."
Heart, desire and hustle! Its the fire within that makes a champion.
|
|
|
11-02-2004, 12:58 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
Star
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Portland Oregon
Age: 40
Posts: 4,072
|
Quote:
Originally posted by <b>Trader Bob</b>!
Much like NVE...
Eddie Jones also has a player option for next year. While there has been rumblings NVE may opt out this summer. I have no idea what EJ may do next summer.
Potentially both are expiring contracts.
|
Again, this seems like a fine plan. And, I'm still hoping to hear more about why Wally would be a better option. 
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|