 |
11-02-2004, 12:27 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Beverly Hills
Age: 34
Posts: 4,924
|
Players we could have drafted instead of Qyntel Woods.
Tayshaun Prince
Carlos Boozer
Flip Murray
Dan Gadzuric
Darius Songalia
Rasual Butler
Amazing...
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
11-02-2004, 12:29 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Equipped Managment
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Klamath Falls
Age: 44
Posts: 1,484
|
Re: Players we could have drafted instead of Qyntel Woods.
Quote:
Originally posted by <b>NathanLane</b>!
Amazing...
|
...that we are going over this again?
__________________
It's only a matter of time before Rip City Rules again!!
|
|
|
11-02-2004, 12:30 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
My Life Is Awesome
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Edmonton
Age: 25
Posts: 16,455
|
Re: Players we could have drafted instead of Qyntel Woods.
Quote:
Originally posted by <b>NathanLane</b>!
Tayshaun Prince
Carlos Boozer
Flip Murray
Dan Gadzuric
Darius Songalia
Rasual Butler
Amazing...
|
Rasual Butler sucks. And what is the point of looking back at what could have been? You made out like bandits that year anyways by drafting Zack so low.
|
|
|
11-02-2004, 12:38 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Star
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
Posts: 3,565
|
Your hindsite is amazing. Too bad it doesn't remember the other few posts that dealt with this same content.
|
|
|
11-02-2004, 12:47 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
BasketballBoards Star
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 3,222
|
What's the deal with people criticizing a post about the Blazer's lack of draft intelligence? What a bunch of lemmings!
|
|
|
11-02-2004, 12:53 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Player
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 673
|
depressing.
|
|
|
11-02-2004, 12:53 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Beverly Hills
Age: 34
Posts: 4,924
|
We didn't draft Zach that year.
|
|
|
11-02-2004, 01:11 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Basketballboards Benchwarmer
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 212
|
and MJ went third, what's the point?? It's not like the player drafted 19th will be better then the player drafted 20th every time, sometimes 20th is better, it happens and people move on.
__________________
if you want your opinion, just ask me
|
|
|
11-02-2004, 01:47 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Legend
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 16,001
|
Prince and Boozers are the only guys I'd clearly prefer to Woods, even in the current state of things. Krstic is a guy, too, I think, although he hasn't proven anything yet.
Given the potential Woods had at the time he was drafted, I think it was a good pick even if it turns out to be a flop.
It could be worse... we could have drafted a guy at #16 and waved him a couple of years later. Unlike Qyntel, who was an enigma with huge upside, Troy Bell was a big reach for Jerry West and the Grizz and it's no surprise to me that he's not panned out.
Ed O.
__________________
"In the end, it all comes down to talent. You can talk all you want about intangibles, I just don't know what that means. Talent makes winners, not intangibles. Can nice guys win? Sure, nice guys can win -- if they're nice guys with a lot of talent. Nice guys with a little talent finish fourth, and nice guys with no talent finish last."
-- Sandy Koufax
|
|
|
11-02-2004, 10:50 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
All-Star
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: internet
Posts: 5,665
|
You left out a couple hundred stiffs we could have drafted instead of Woods.
What we knew then, it was the right pick.
Still might turn out that way in the end.
__________________
I know what I know. - Paul Simon
I'm ALWAYS right and I NEVER lie. - George C. Tirebiter
Life is tough, it's tougher when you're stupid. - John Wayne
The United States is a nation of laws: badly written and randomly enforced. - Frank Zappa
You are responsible for your children until they are a credit to society. - Jovan Banjanin
|
|
|
11-03-2004, 08:22 AM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
Retired From The Beat
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Portland
Age: 27
Posts: 2,454
|
I just remember being excited at the prospect of drafting a guy who was supposed to go in the top 10. I think that was the general consensus. Everyone, and I mean EVERYONE, loved that pick. I guess Bob Whitsitt is going to be blamed for this team's follies until the day he dies.
|
|
|
11-03-2004, 09:28 AM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
All-Star
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: "ORAGUN", not "ORYGONE"!
Posts: 6,863
|
What is with you, NathanLane? I'm about as anti-Qyntel as anyone here, but even I don't see the point of all the second-guessing you're doing yesterday/today.
And how can you be so dialed in on Qyntel's faults yet be so oblivious to Rasheed's?
What's done is done. Let it go. Take what you have right now and do the best you can with it.
PBF
__________________
HEY! I was the lucky 999,999th visitor YESTERDAY, too! 
.
|
|
|
11-03-2004, 12:23 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
-PREMIUM MEMBER-
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,753
|
When you take chances in drafting, sometimes you do well and sometimes you get shafted. Hey, plenty of can't miss prospects miss.
Yeah, we all thought Woods was talented. He was. But there was a reason he dropped like a stone in the draft: marijuana and attitude. Not suprisingly Whitsitt didn't care. Blazers could have gotten lucky but didn't.
No point in going over and over it. But to say it's somehow unfair to blame Whitsitt for his pick, a pick other teams shied away from due to off-court issues when Whitsitt never saw an off-court issue he considered too major, is silly. Part of the "Whitsitt never made a mistake" mindset.
Woods was a mistake, we can't redo the 2002 draft. It's up to current leadership to clean up mistakes. It's not going to happen in one season but they are at least moving in the right way.
|
|
|
 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|