 |
|
11-21-2005, 02:02 PM
|
#31 (permalink)
|
|
Legend
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 16,001
|
Re: Patterson sent back to Portland
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Schilly
What a winner.
|
What SHOULD he do? Shrug his shoulders at the losses, knowing that the team will let him walk just as they approach competitiveness? Bite his tongue as he remains affixed to the bench as an out-of-position backup, watching his free agent value whither away? Ignore his recent teammates scattered throughout the league that are playing significant roles on much more successful clubs?
Squeeky wheels get the grease, and it's natural that RP wants a change. Being a squeeky wheel is just about the only way to effect that. It has nothing to do with being a "winner".
Ed O.
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
11-21-2005, 02:04 PM
|
#32 (permalink)
|
|
Star
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,320
|
Re: Patterson sent back to Portland
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ed O
He's acting like a dip**** because the team is so bad, because there's no hope for it getting much better while he's here, and because he cares about winning.
Ed O.
|
Sorry Ed, but from the reports I read, Ruben's complaint wasn't about losing; it was about playing time. He wanted more of it than Nate was giving him. Ruben was being selfish and threw a tirade fitting of a 2 year-old.
I'm with McMillan and Blazers management on this one.
__________________
Blazermania is BACK!!!
|
|
|
11-21-2005, 02:06 PM
|
#33 (permalink)
|
|
Legend
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 16,001
|
Re: Patterson sent back to Portland
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by e_blazer1
Sorry Ed, but from the reports I read, Ruben's complaint wasn't about losing; it was about playing time. He wanted more of it than Nate was giving him. Ruben was being selfish and threw a tirade fitting of a 2 year-old.
|
Are his minutes down this year? I'm honestly asking. Because I don't remember these sorts of explosions when the team was making the playoffs and winning 50 games a year.
He has NO influence over whether the team can win or not (beyond being on the floor), but if he complains it's conceivable he can, at least, get extra minutes to help the team win.
Edit: his minutes ARE down. From 28 minutes or so last year to 19 or so this year. Maybe I'm giving him too much credit.
Ed O.
|
|
|
11-21-2005, 02:07 PM
|
#34 (permalink)
|
|
Banned member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Age: 82
Posts: 28,436
|
Re: Patterson sent back to Portland
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ed O
What SHOULD he do? Shrug his shoulders at the losses, knowing that the team will let him walk just as they approach competitiveness? Bite his tongue as he remains affixed to the bench as an out-of-position backup, watching his free agent value whither away? Ignore his recent teammates scattered throughout the league that are playing significant roles on much more successful clubs?
Squeeky wheels get the grease, and it's natural that RP wants a change. Being a squeeky wheel is just about the only way to effect that. It has nothing to do with being a "winner".
Ed O.
|
how about he a: realize his free agent value is low to begin with b: talk to the *COACH* privately c: realize that there's a reason why he plays out of position and thats because he's really not good enough TO play SF regularly and d: the players thare playing "significant roles on much more successful clubs" were much better players than him and really have nothing to do with him?
|
|
|
11-21-2005, 02:20 PM
|
#35 (permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,480
|
Re: Patterson sent back to Portland
I really wish they'd just waive him - his tirades are really getting old. So you have to sit on the bench to make your millions - life is rough, deal with it Ruben.
__________________
"The Blazers will bounce on up to the top again, just like they have before. And when they do I'll be cheering for 'em as loud as anybody."
- Bill Walton
|
|
|
11-21-2005, 02:23 PM
|
#36 (permalink)
|
|
All-Star
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The Crystal Lake
Posts: 6,509
|
Re: Patterson sent back to Portland
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ed O
Why on earth would Ruben Patterson want to sit on the bench while a bunch of young guys lose games?Ed O.
|
He wouldn't. He shouldn't. But frankly, he just isn't playing well enough to warrant getting more minutes. He needs to look in the mirror if he wants to know who's keeping him off the court. Cursing at the coach is not going to help get him traded to a winner. If he wasn't so stupid, I think he might get that.
__________________
When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross. -- Sinclair Lewis, 1935
If you sit by the river long enough, you will see the body of your enemy float by. -- Japanese proverb
|
|
|
11-21-2005, 02:30 PM
|
#37 (permalink)
|
|
All-Star
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: "ORAGUN", not "ORYGONE"!
Posts: 6,863
|
Re: Patterson sent back to Portland
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ed O
It was just a matter of time. This team has no chance of succeeding this year, and passionate veterans like Ruben are bound to become upset. Fortunately in this respect, Portland has few veterans so there aren't that many people to send back home.
Ed O.
|
That post is full of ****. The only thing Ruben is passionate about is the number of minutes he gets on the floor. **** him and **** that post, too.
PBF
__________________
HEY! I was the lucky 999,999th visitor YESTERDAY, too! 
.
|
|
|
11-21-2005, 02:32 PM
|
#38 (permalink)
|
|
Star
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 2,946
|
Re: Patterson sent back to Portland
Quote:
“Ruben will be what he has always been during his career — a bench player,” Nash was quoted as saying. “I don’t see him getting many minutes.”
That's not unprofessional in the least.
|
You don't consider that an unprofessional comment, coming from the GM?! How much further can you go to disrupt an individual's focus and confidence? If someone said that about you, how much motivation would you be left with to buy into what management and the coaching staff are saying? To me, that's just about the worst possible thing a GM could say publicly.
Quote:
|
And last year when he was upset about Cheeks being fired instead of demanding a "high level of professionalism" they gave him time off to go home and pout and paid him...
|
I'm not at all clear what you're implying... As I've stated before, there was never anything conclusive stating that Ruben (or NVE) quit on the team. From what I could tell, they wanted to play and contribute, but were told no thanks, because the team wanted to play the youngsters almost exclusively. I would hope any competitive person would be upset with that.
Dan
|
|
|
11-21-2005, 02:32 PM
|
#39 (permalink)
|
|
Legend
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 16,001
|
Re: Patterson sent back to Portland
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Fork
He wouldn't. He shouldn't. But frankly, he just isn't playing well enough to warrant getting more minutes. He needs to look in the mirror if he wants to know who's keeping him off the court. Cursing at the coach is not going to help get him traded to a winner. If he wasn't so stupid, I think he might get that.
|
I'm not claiming he's an intelligent man, but do you think that his minutes are down this year because he's a worse player? Or because the team has better options?
Looking at the roster and roles of players, I think "no" and "no". I think that the team is playing him less because they are less concerned with winning than they are about developing players. That's TOTALLY FINE and TOTALLY LEGIT as a strategy for the team, but all I'm saying is that I understand why he's doing what he's doing, and I think that more NBA players would do it than some of us think.
Ed O.
|
|
|
11-21-2005, 02:33 PM
|
#40 (permalink)
|
|
Legend
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 16,001
|
Re: Patterson sent back to Portland
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ProudBFan
That post is full of ****. The only thing Ruben is passionate about is the number of minutes he gets on the floor. **** him and **** that post, too.
|
Are you serious?
Please tell me you're joking.
Ed O.
|
|
|
11-21-2005, 02:57 PM
|
#41 (permalink)
|
|
All-Star
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: "ORAGUN", not "ORYGONE"!
Posts: 6,863
|
Re: Patterson sent back to Portland
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ed O
Are you serious?
Please tell me you're joking.
|
Yes, I'm dead serious.
No, I'm not joking.
I'm not in a frame of mind to mince words with you Ed, nor am I permitted to say here what I really think of you, your outlook on the team, or your agenda here on this forum because it most definately would qualify as a personal attack.
I said exactly what I meant to say, and that's all I'm going to say.
PBF
__________________
HEY! I was the lucky 999,999th visitor YESTERDAY, too! 
.
|
|
|
11-21-2005, 03:06 PM
|
#42 (permalink)
|
|
BasketballBoards 6th Man
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 373
|
Re: Patterson sent back to Portland
It's just a bad fit for everyone....a volatile veteran who wants minutes and wins....a bad team that wants to develop young talent....just doesn't work. Unfortunately for Ruben that is the chance you take when you sign a long term contract. I am so sick of these guys who want the security of a long term deal, yet when the going gets rough they want to be traded. Can't have it both ways!
|
|
|
11-21-2005, 03:12 PM
|
#43 (permalink)
|
|
BasketballBoards Star
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 3,222
|
Re: Patterson sent back to Portland
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ProudBFan
Yes, I'm dead serious.
No, I'm not joking.
I'm not in a frame of mind to mince words with you Ed, nor am I permitted to say here what I really think of you, your outlook on the team, or your agenda here on this forum because it most definately would qualify as a personal attack.
I said exactly what I meant to say, and that's all I'm going to say.
PBF
|
I do not believe Ed has an agenda on this forum. I know I don't.
|
|
|
11-21-2005, 03:18 PM
|
#44 (permalink)
|
|
Star
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Portland Oregon
Age: 40
Posts: 4,072
| |