 |
|
11-21-2005, 07:55 PM
|
#76 (permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 1,390
|
Re: Patterson sent back to Portland
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Schilly
Ask Jason Quick
|
post of the year
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
11-21-2005, 08:00 PM
|
#77 (permalink)
|
|
Banned member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Age: 82
Posts: 28,436
|
Re: Patterson sent back to Portland
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dkap
No offense, but that's one of the worst collection of examples I've seen, at least in terms of relevancy to the topic of discussion -- namely, Ruben wanting more opportunity to contribute. Each of those players named above was a key player on their respective teams and would've had no reason to complain about minutes, even if it were their disposition to do so.
And Ray Allen an example of harmonious play through tough stretches? Give me a break.
Dan
|
If Ruben's play justified him getting more minutes, I could understand why we have people defending his *****ing. But his play doesn't justify it.
|
|
|
11-21-2005, 08:17 PM
|
#78 (permalink)
|
|
Star
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 2,946
|
Re: Patterson sent back to Portland
I agree that he hasn't played at a particularly high level so far this year, but last year he was one of the most productive players on the team, yet we had these same issues on the table. Ruben and management are simply at odds, regardless of his output on the court.
Dan
|
|
|
11-21-2005, 08:25 PM
|
#79 (permalink)
|
|
Benchwarmer
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Golden CO, or Bend, OR
Age: 23
Posts: 214
Rep Power: 4
|
Re: Patterson sent back to Portland
The team should activate Ha.
Give him about 10 min a game at center and let Theo get the back up PF mins and what ever is left over at center.
It sounds like Victor is still questionable with a Toe injury and really there is enough small forwards activated as it is. I'd rather have more size for now in the back court.
|
|
|
11-21-2005, 08:26 PM
|
#80 (permalink)
|
|
commie pinko
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: with the supermodels
Posts: 6,411
|
Re: Patterson sent back to Portland
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Talkhard
I no longer have any interest in retaining his services.
|
Well then, you should send him a certified letter along with the balance due on his contract.
barfo
|
|
|
11-21-2005, 09:00 PM
|
#81 (permalink)
|
|
Just looking
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Salem, OR
Age: 47
Posts: 11,878
Rep Power: 416051
|
Re: Patterson sent back to Portland
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ed O
But for a guy who's 30 years old and going to be a free agent in a year and a half, I don't see how a guy can continue to give a **** and not say something.
Ed O.
|
Then there is what I said all summer long. Its entirely possible that Ruben opts out of his contract this year... He may not have to wait a year and a half. If he is motivated to get out of here, he has his own fate in his hands at the expense of loosing bigger dollars by opting out. He will not get over $6 mil if he resigns with another team on mid July IMHO. But he can put himself in a position to be where he wants and on a winning team.
__________________
"The whole is greater than the sum of its parts..."
Heart, desire and hustle! Its the fire within that makes a champion.
|
|
|
11-21-2005, 09:08 PM
|
#82 (permalink)
|
|
Just looking
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Salem, OR
Age: 47
Posts: 11,878
Rep Power: 416051
|
Re: Patterson sent back to Portland
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ed O
I've read that DA was a terrible influence, that Ruben's a bad influence, that Zach and Darius are bad influences... at some point management will have to figure out that there are few angels in the NBA, and a "culture of winning" is actually dependent on winning some games, rather than repeatedly drawing lines in the sand and counting on repeated lottery appearances to improve the team.
Ed O.
|
The flip side to your argument is that management actually may be right and you may only have an opinion.
And the solution to the problem is? What will make us title contenders in 2 years?..... I am waiting?
The Blazer brass has painted themselves into a corner and they have to live with it. Assuming we try to trade Ruben and get something in return. Even at an even talent return which is unlikely or he opts out this summer... the talent pool has been dwindling for a few years. We have untapped potential... no proven talent. Winning seasons are in a galaxy far far away....
__________________
"The whole is greater than the sum of its parts..."
Heart, desire and hustle! Its the fire within that makes a champion.
|
|
|
11-21-2005, 09:12 PM
|
#83 (permalink)
|
|
Just looking
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Salem, OR
Age: 47
Posts: 11,878
Rep Power: 416051
|
Re: Patterson sent back to Portland
Ruben has gone off each year with some of his tirades.... usually 2x a year. Its like the rains and snows in the fall, and the flowers coming out in the spring. You can just about count on it.
In the past couple of years he has settled down and kept his foot out of his mouth and played inspired ball. Maybe this is his usual rant... maybe its beyond that now, and as Ed says.. very frustrated and hating to loose. He is emotional.... which is not a problem. Its how he harnesses it that makes the difference.
__________________
"The whole is greater than the sum of its parts..."
Heart, desire and hustle! Its the fire within that makes a champion.
|
|
|
11-21-2005, 09:12 PM
|
#84 (permalink)
|
|
Schilster Supreme
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lake Wilsonwood
Posts: 13,607
|
Re: Patterson sent back to Portland
I think it's entirely possible that Rben won't be a Blazer by the time he makes it back to Portand. Remember they said he's gonna hang out with Damon today then head to Ohio where his wife and kids are.
Nash on Courtside said he has had several discussions regarding Patterson and trades, in the last 24 hours in fact had multiple this afternoon. There was a lot of caution regarding wether anything was pending, in fact I got the impression the way it was handled that it was possible, that talks may be serious. The Courtside guys were cautious to ask things by prefacing by pointing out that Nash shouldn't feel pressure to mention if anything was pending, nor should he feel pressure to drop hints. Nash didn't even aknowledge the fact they mentioned the term "pending" so neither aknowledged nor denied. IMO if nothing is pending Nash says "there is nothing iminent".
|
|
|
11-21-2005, 09:17 PM
|
#85 (permalink)
|
|
Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: TEMPE, AZ
Posts: 825
|
Re: Patterson sent back to Portland
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Trader Bob
Then there is what I said all summer long. Its entirely possible that Ruben opts out of his contract this year... He may not have to wait a year and a half. If he is motivated to get out of here, he has his own fate in his hands at the expense of loosing bigger dollars by opting out. He will not get over $6 mil if he resigns with another team on mid July IMHO. But he can put himself in a position to be where he wants and on a winning team.
|
The easiest way to move Patterson is to get him to waive his trade kicker. If he will not do that then he will most likely not opt out and management will most likely just park his butt until he becomes an expiring deal. In all, I agree 100% with your post.
__________________
BRANDON
ROOKIE
OF THE
YEAR
|
|
|
11-21-2005, 09:21 PM
|
#86 (permalink)
|
|
Just looking
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Salem, OR
Age: 47
Posts: 11,878
Rep Power: 416051
|
Re: Patterson sent back to Portland
Its funny the way they are handling this with Ruben compared to what Darius did last year???
Ruben seems to be getting set up for a much harsher penalty
I am not 100% positive but I do not think they can waive the trade kicker
Rubens salary $6.3 mil... with trade kicker about $8.3 mil
25% less for teams over the cap puts it about $6.1 mil in return
__________________
"The whole is greater than the sum of its parts..."
Heart, desire and hustle! Its the fire within that makes a champion.
|
|
|
11-21-2005, 09:28 PM
|
#87 (permalink)
|
|
Supporting Jerk
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 4,137
|
Re: Patterson sent back to Portland
anybody have any idea what the other transgressions were that have been cited in the articles?
i wonder if ruben has been picking fights in practice or mouthing off to coach constantly...
|
|
|
11-21-2005, 09:35 PM
|
#88 (permalink)
|
|
Schilster Supreme
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lake Wilsonwood
Posts: 13,607
|
Re: Patterson sent back to Portland
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by BIG Q
The easiest way to move Patterson is to get him to waive his trade kicker. If he will not do that then he will most likely not opt out and management will most likely just park his butt until he becomes an expiring deal. In all, I agree 100% with your post.
|
Just to extrapolate on this. He can only waive as much of the kicker as it takes to get the deal done, no more.
|
|
|
11-21-2005, 09:40 PM
|
#89 (permalink)
|
|
BasketballBoards Player
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New Jeeeeeersey
Posts: 568
|
Re: Patterson sent back to Portland
Coupla quick things.....and I promised myself I wouldn't respond to Ed in this thread.....but two things just demanded a response.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ed O
Who's justifying?
Please tell me where I've justified anything. I look forward to specifics.
Thanks,
Ed O.
|
C'mon Ed.....I totally respect your views and your right to have and express them.....but are you seriously suggesting you weren't justifying anything Ruben did? By trying to shift blame (in whole or in part) to management, you are defending him. By calling him a "Passionate veteran who wants to win" you are describing him with words of praise. If those aren't at least attempts at justification....I dont know what it would be considered.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ed O
A couple things:
1. Who says we "should" have won the game yesterday morning? The Knicks were in control the whole game and the Knicks are a better team. I don't know why anyone would think that we "should" have won in NYC.
Ed O.
|
I disagree with this statement. Completely. Did you watch the game Ed? I know it was early on a Sunday morning on the west coast, so I wouldnt be suprised if you didnt. I know I would have missed it if I were in Portland. But I'm in Jersey and I was at the game. As I've said time and time again since the game....it was completely back and forth the entire game. The ONLY stretch in which the Knicks were in control or looked anything like a "better team" was a 2-4 minute stretch in the third quarter when Zach, Telfair, and Miles were all out of the game. If you remove that 9-0 run, we lose by two points.
Two.
And how can you say the Knicks were in control the whole game when WE were leading at halftime....and throughout the first half (though by slim margins).
__________________
Believe meh
It ain't ea-say
|
|
|
11-21-2005, 10:10 PM
|
#90 (permalink)
|
|
Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: TEMPE, AZ
Posts: 825
|
Re: Patterson sent back to Portland
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Schilly
Just to extrapolate on this. He can only waive as much of the kicker as it takes to get the deal done, no more.
|
You are correct, and Patterson can also waive his player option for next season to facilitate a trade.
__________________
BRANDON
ROOKIE
OF THE
YEAR
|
|
|
|