 |
03-17-2006, 09:40 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
-PREMIUM MEMBER-
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 10,627
|
There's Certainly Not Enough Local Money To Be A Potential Blazers' Owner...
.....if there's not even enough to purchase a local historic mansion.
From: Bloomberg
Quote:
March 17 (Bloomberg) -- A 1927 Tudor revival mansion built by one of the first American lumber barons is on the market for $2.35 million in Portland, Oregon, boasting leaded-glass windows and a closet for silverware.
What it lacks is a buyer.
The 10,000-square-foot (930-square-meter) home was built by Thomas J. Autzen, who made his fortune pioneering the manufacture and sale of plywood to the U.S. construction industry. He used his own invention for shelves in the house's map room.
A steal in almost any other West Coast market, the Autzen place hasn't sold even with its pedigree. The Portland-based Autzen Foundation supports education and the arts, and the stadium at the University of Oregon bears the Autzen name. The problem, says Jerry Johnson, a real estate economist, is a lack of local wealth.
``It's pretty rarified air for Portland,'' says Johnson, of Johnson Gardner LLC, a Portland-based consulting firm to property developers. ``There aren't that many buyers in that range.''.....
|
Notably...
Quote:
The owners, Gregg Miller and his wife Christine Howell- Miller bought the house for $875,000 in 1999 from Steve Johnson, who played for the National Basketball Association's Portland Trail Blazers from 1986 to 1989.
The Millers have spent more than $500,000 restoring the place, which was in some disrepair when they bought it, says Gregg Miller. They rebuilt the chimneys, which were leaking, stripped the oak woodwork in the dining room, and repaired all the leaded-glass windows.
``It was pretty rough,'' says Miller, 57.....
|
__________________
"It takes ten hands to score one basket." ~John Wooden
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
03-17-2006, 09:43 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Running down the dream!!!
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ripcity, USA
Posts: 2,916
|
Re: There's Certainly Not Enough Local Money To Be A Potential Blazers' Owner...
OK - I'll take it! 
__________________
Trail Blazers Fan since Walton was injured the first time!
OSU Beavers Alumni & Fan since Ralph Miller's Orange Express -
"Fans cheer when they have reason to." Stop the programmed noise!!
|
|
|
03-17-2006, 10:34 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Shadow of Everest
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Portland
Age: 30
Posts: 7,681
|
Re: There's Certainly Not Enough Local Money To Be A Potential Blazers' Owner...
there is enough $$...ever visited Dunthorpe, West Linn, Lake Oswego, Portland Heights, Vista, Council Crest, Forest Heights, Alameda. Lots of huge Mansions in all those neighborhoods.
__________________
Trailblazers, Yankees, Chiefs, Oregon Ducks, Arsenal,Stars
BASEBALL FANS!! Visit our sister site at: http://www.baseballforum.com/
"I took the road less traveled by, and that has made all the difference." Robert Frost
|
|
|
03-17-2006, 10:35 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
-PREMIUM MEMBER-
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 10,627
|
Re: There's Certainly Not Enough Local Money To Be A Potential Blazers' Owner...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by sa1177
there is enough $$...ever visited Dunthorpe, West Linn, Lake Oswego, Portland Heights, Vista, Council Crest, Forest Heights, Alameda. Lots of huge Mansions in all those neighborhoods.
|
I won't soon forget my visit to the Pittock. 
__________________
"It takes ten hands to score one basket." ~John Wooden
|
|
|
03-17-2006, 12:04 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Star
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,337
|
Re: There's Certainly Not Enough Local Money To Be A Potential Blazers' Owner...
They buy it for $875k, claim to invest $500k restoring the place and, total $1.37million now it is worth $2.35million???
Maybe the reson they can't sell it, isn't because there aren't rich folks in Portland, maybe it is because the are vastly overvaluing this home.
Ya think? Maybe? Huh? Duh?
Establishing value for a home is not a matter of what you paid, plus what you put into it, plus you sweat equity, plus a little something something for your trouble, plus tack on the enormous Realtor commission - voila - the price.
It is what a buyer will pay. The buyer doesn't care if you got it for a bargain, or are selling at a loss. They compare it to other properties. Problem with this house is the neighborhood - which sports average house prices well below the metro average. This house is the most expensive, and doesn't fit the area. There are other big, historic homes in that area, that have sold in the for around $1 million. This one is real big, so maybe $1.5 to $2.0 if you find the right buyer who wants the biggest house around (few do anymore).
http://www.movingtoportland.net/livi...st.htm#Alameda
http://search.movingtoportland.net/i...page&page=9307
I think the owners overimproved for their neighborhood, and possibly overpaid to begin with. If it was as bad a shape as they say, $875k was probably too much. You could get a LOT of house in 99 for that kind of money.
And it is a news story when homeowners list a house with a pie in the sky price - and gasp! - can't find any suckers, er, takers?
|
|
|
03-17-2006, 12:21 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Portland/Eugene Oregon
Age: 22
Posts: 1,187
|
Re: There's Certainly Not Enough Local Money To Be A Potential Blazers' Owner...
Rasheed is finally (or has sold, I'm not sure) listing his house in Dunthorpe for sale. He bought it initially from a classmate of mine for a little ove 3 million. I think he wants over 4 millions for it. I figure it will sell quickly.
|
|
|
03-17-2006, 12:21 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Legend
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 15,270
|
Re: There's Certainly Not Enough Local Money To Be A Potential Blazers' Owner...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Masbee
They buy it for $875k, claim to invest $500k restoring the place and, total $1.37million now it is worth $2.35million???
|
I agree with you about it being only worth what someone will pay for it, but that goes to the assertion that there aren't many wealthy purchasers in the Portland area.
As for whether it's "pie in the sky": I have little notion of the Portland real estate market, but it doesn't seem to be a ridiculous price to me.
If they purchased the house for $875k in 1999 and invested $100k in restoring it each of the years 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004, the average rate of return would have to be just over 9% to get to $2.35m... certainly better than inflation, but not ridiculous.
Just something to chew on.
Ed O.
|
|
|
03-17-2006, 12:21 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
commie pinko
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: with the supermodels
Posts: 5,921
|
Re: There's Certainly Not Enough Local Money To Be A Potential Blazers' Owner...
Yeah, it's been on the market for a looong time. I've seen the listings several times. On the other hand, if you are going to make an extra million dollars, it may be worth waiting a few years for the perfect sucker to come along. Totally overpriced as Masbee says, but you only need one buyer...
barfo
|
|
|
03-17-2006, 01:13 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Portland/Eugene Oregon
Age: 22
Posts: 1,187
|
Re: There's Certainly Not Enough Local Money To Be A Potential Blazers' Owner...
After Shawn Kemp left portland his house was for sale for about 3 years until it finally sold. I have a feeling he just wouldn't budge on the price and since he really didn't need the money he just let it sit.
|
|
|
03-17-2006, 02:33 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
hungry
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: munch munch munch
Posts: 7,861
|
Re: There's Certainly Not Enough Local Money To Be A Potential Blazers' Owner...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ed O
I agree with you about it being only worth what someone will pay for it, but that goes to the assertion that there aren't many wealthy purchasers in the Portland area.
As for whether it's "pie in the sky": I have little notion of the Portland real estate market, but it doesn't seem to be a ridiculous price to me.
If they purchased the house for $875k in 1999 and invested $100k in restoring it each of the years 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004, the average rate of return would have to be just over 9% to get to $2.35m... certainly better than inflation, but not ridiculous.
Just something to chew on.
Ed O.
|
that's a pretty interesting way to look at it. even in this overheated real estate market it isn't always easy to make huge returns on your investment. that's why I can't wait to finally be out of real estate investing in a week (when my only rental property closes).
history has shown that stocks outperform real estate on a larger time scale, and they're a hell of a lot less work.
I'm one week from being rid of the Shawn Kemp of rental properties, and I just got a call from a tenant whining about a toilet that's leaking water on the floor.
|
|
|
03-17-2006, 02:38 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Star
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,337
|
Re: There's Certainly Not Enough Local Money To Be A Potential Blazers' Owner...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ed O
I agree with you about it being only worth what someone will pay for it, but that goes to the assertion that there aren't many wealthy purchasers in the Portland area.
As for whether it's "pie in the sky": I have little notion of the Portland real estate market, but it doesn't seem to be a ridiculous price to me.
If they purchased the house for $875k in 1999 and invested $100k in restoring it each of the years 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004, the average rate of return would have to be just over 9% to get to $2.35m... certainly better than inflation, but not ridiculous.
Just something to chew on.
Ed O.
|
There are lots of multi-million dollar house in Portland metro.
My proposition was 3 fold:
1) they overpaid initially - that affects the "correct" rate of return.
2) they over-invested in the rehab - that too affects the numbers.
3) they aren't in a "hot" neighborhood generally, and specifically that neighborhood isn't even on the radar of rich buyers. - in many markets there is a glass ceiling of price, past which it is extremely difficult to obtain a higher price, no matter how much money you sunk into "restoration". If you do the wrong thing to the wrong house in the wrong neighborhood, that puts a cap on you possible rate of return.
Like I said, current buyers don't give a hoot about their rate of return and weather it is good or bad.
Real Estate is Location, location, location.
That house is in an ok location. Not terrible, but not a primo spot in town. Now, change the parameter to location for multi-million dollar homes - and it goes for ok, to a bad location. Just a fact of life that most high-end home buyers want to cluster around other high-end homes. This is the current fashion in most of the U.S. Homes like that become hard sells. They have to find the rare buyer. In bad markets they are white elephants.
|
|
|
03-17-2006, 03:21 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
Shadow of Everest
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Portland
Age: 30
Posts: 7,681
|
Re: There's Certainly Not Enough Local Money To Be A Potential Blazers' Owner...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Masbee
They buy it for $875k, claim to invest $500k restoring the place and, total $1.37million now it is worth $2.35million???
Maybe the reson they can't sell it, isn't because there aren't rich folks in Portland, maybe it is because the are vastly overvaluing this home.
Ya think? Maybe? Huh? Duh?
Establishing value for a home is not a matter of what you paid, plus what you put into it, plus you sweat equity, plus a little something something for your trouble, plus tack on the enormous Realtor commission - voila - the price.
It is what a buyer will pay. The buyer doesn't care if you got it for a bargain, or are selling at a loss. They compare it to other properties. Problem with this house is the neighborhood - which sports average house prices well below the metro average. This house is the most expensive, and doesn't fit the area. There are other big, historic homes in that area, that have sold in the for around $1 million. This one is real big, so maybe $1.5 to $2.0 if you find the right buyer who wants the biggest house around (few do anymore).
http://www.movingtoportland.net/livi...st.htm#Alameda
http://search.movingtoportland.net/i...page&page=9307
I think the owners overimproved for their neighborhood, and possibly overpaid to begin with. If it was as bad a shape as they say, $875k was probably too much. You could get a LOT of house in 99 for that kind of money.
And it is a news story when homeowners list a house with a pie in the sky price - and gasp! - can't find any suckers, er, takers?
|
I disagree...this house is both big and historic. The Portland housing market is booming, it's currently a great market for sellers. I bet they have to come down in price a little bit but I don't think it's drastically overpriced.
__________________
Trailblazers, Yankees, Chiefs, Oregon Ducks, Arsenal,Stars
BASEBALL FANS!! Visit our sister site at: http://www.baseballforum.com/
"I took the road less traveled by, and that has made all the difference." Robert Frost
|
|
|
03-17-2006, 04:40 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
Blazer Fan
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: On the backboard
Posts: 2,254
|
Re: There's Certainly Not Enough Local Money To Be A Potential Blazers' Owner...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Masbee
|
I've driven by that house many times. Nice place, great neighborhood.
__________________
' ////
( o )
////
|
|
|
< |