 |
|
03-30-2006, 02:46 PM
|
#31 (permalink)
|
|
BasketballBoards Star
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Oregon
Age: 17
Posts: 3,969
|
Re: Re-Thinking the 2004 draft
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Fork
nm
|
?? 
__________________
Best song of all time!!!!! Seattle Mariners
Seattle Seahawks
Portland TrailBlazers
Oregon Ducks
Gonzaga Bulldogs
Portland TrailBlazers Resident Homer!
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
03-30-2006, 02:47 PM
|
#32 (permalink)
|
|
Top Of The Pops
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: I like American music...do you like American music? I like American music...baby....
Posts: 27,458
|
Re: Re-Thinking the 2004 draft
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by BEER&BASKETBALL
I guess you kinda got me on that one. But what I base my opinion of a GM on is how the move looked at the time it was made.
|
When evaluating a single decision, I agree with you. One should evaluate it based on what was known at the time.
However, when evaluating an overall body of work, results are what matter. If a GM, or any other executive, is successful over a significant amount of time, that matters more than understanding why he chose to do what he did. If an executive is unsuccessful over a significant amount of time, that matters more than whether the decisions seemed rational at the time.
That's how executives are always judged, by results. Not by what made sense at the time.
__________________
You'll never live like common people
You'll never do what common people do
You'll never fail like common people
You'll never watch your life slide out of view
And dance and drink and screw
Because there's nothing else to do.
|
|
|
03-30-2006, 02:54 PM
|
#33 (permalink)
|
|
Star
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: *3rd* most dangerous city in America
Posts: 3,030
|
Re: Re-Thinking the 2004 draft
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jwhoops11
Wow, I guess I'm just not sure what people expect out of a guy two years removed from High School...
Did you expect Bryant, Garnett, or Lebron??
|
No. In fact, I didn't expect much - not much was expected of Telfair, which is why he would've fallen lower than #15 if Nash hadn't had a "hunch" about him.
Hell, it's not that he's a high-schooler - so is Shaun Livingston, who is also developing slowly, but whom I'd much rather have than Telfair. It's his style of play. I think you either are a pass-first guard or you aren't. Telfair isn't. That doesn't change. Larry Brown couldn't change Iverson into a pass-first guard, so he moved him to SG. Now he's pulling his hair out because Thomas gave him Marbury AND Francis (AND Nate Robinson). I don't like score-first PGs. I don't particularly like short PGs either, which is why I'm not TOO cut up about not getting Chris Paul.
Quote:
|
How about giving the guy a chance to reach legal drinking age before we give up on him?
|
I'm from England - legal drinking age is when you're old enough to reach the bar. The best English player is Wayne Rooney, who was a star by age 18. But I digress.
Quote:
|
As far as I'm concerned the flashes he shows allows him at least that much...
|
He shows flashes because he's a flashy player. That's different from a good player.
Quote:
|
For the love of god, how about we give Nate a chance to mold these young guys in the name of continuity, before we begin calling them disappointments.
|
Is that what Nate's doing by playing them 30 minutes one game and 0 the next?
I don't think Telfair wants to be "molded". He wants to play "his" game. So I say, more power to him - let him play it somewhere else.
__________________
"I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just; that his justice cannot sleep forever." -- Thomas Jefferson, not-so-proud Founding Father
|
|
|
03-30-2006, 03:09 PM
|
#34 (permalink)
|
|
Burp!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: RIP CITY
Posts: 9,649
|
Re: Re-Thinking the 2004 draft
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Minstrel
When evaluating a single decision, I agree with you. One should evaluate it based on what was known at the time.
However, when evaluating an overall body of work, results are what matter. If a GM, or any other executive, is successful over a significant amount of time, that matters more than understanding why he chose to do what he did. If an executive is unsuccessful over a significant amount of time, that matters more than whether the decisions seemed rational at the time.
That's how executives are always judged, by results. Not by what made sense at the time.
|
True.
__________________
"People say we are coming, but I almost think it's to the point where we are here," he said. "I think it's no longer coming. We are here now."... Brandon Roy.
|
|
|
03-30-2006, 07:18 PM
|
#35 (permalink)
|
|
BasketballBoards Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The Sonics belong in the PUGET SOUND
Age: 21
Posts: 1,801
|
Re: Re-Thinking the 2004 draft
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by BEER&BASKETBALL
These threads are hilarious! WHAT IF we would have drafted so and so.... what if so and so would have passed the ball to so and so instead of so and so... what if the refs wouldnt have screwed up the Super Bowl... what if it doesnt matter, we did what we did, and now we have to live with the good and bad of it all, regardless of what the question is.
|
exactly. hindsight is 20/20. This is what happens in the draft. Sometimes guys breakout faster than others, sometimes guys are drafted into a system that fits them perfect, sometimes a second round pick works harder than a lotto pick and has a better career because they work harder. Drafting is really a gamble, unless it's an incredibly loaded draft like 96 or 03.
|
|
|
03-30-2006, 07:43 PM
|
#36 (permalink)
|
|
Banned member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Age: 82
Posts: 28,436
|
Re: Re-Thinking the 2004 draft
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SheedSoNasty
The one thing that gets me about that proposal is that Smith has been criticized for the same problem that Darius has... motivation. If that's the case, I'm not so sure he fit well into Nate's system of playing hard at all times. However, I'd much rather take a chance on Smith than have Darius for the remainder of his contract.
|
This post made me think of one thing...I totally and absolutely forgot that the Trail Blazers had Charles Smith on the team.
was he included in the Ruben trade? I forgot.
|
|
|
03-30-2006, 08:28 PM
|
#37 (permalink)
|
|
We Got Next.
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 6,397
|
Re: Re-Thinking the 2004 draft
I was talkin about J.R. Smith, Hap.
And yes, he was included in the Ruben trade.
__________________
We Believe In Brandon Roy (PM to Join!):
~ SheedSoNasty ~ BlazeTop ~ handclap problematic ~ Draco ~ Target ~ drexlersdad ~ Stugots ~ PhilK ~ bruindre ~ ehizzy3 ~ dwood615 ~ GottahaveyourPAUGASOL ~ Benis007 ~ dudleysghost ~ TheBigDonut ~ MAS Rip City ~ Blazers2121 ~ Trailblazed&Confused ~ ProudBFan ~ Utherhimo ~ Stanthecaddy22 ~ ThePrideOfClyde ~ Talkhard ~ Blazer Freak ~ LameR ~ OnTheRocks ~ BiggaAdams~ ptownblazer1 ~ B_&_B ~ ChadWick ~ World B. Free
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|