Well, obviously I'm arguing in vain, but not because I can't interpret facts.
Yes, Sheed's playoff stats are slightly worse (at least arguably) than his regular season stats.
Where we differ is that you implied that means that he "never" stepped up in the playoffs. And averages don't say anything about "never".
barfo
Actually I implied that...Barfo I really expect you to pay more attention. I suppose I would now revise my statement to "hardly ever" raised his stats in the playoffs. Either way he never lead the team to winning a damn thing. That's beside the point though.
BASEBALL FANS!! Visit our sister site at: http://www.baseballforum.com/ "I took the road less traveled by, and that has made all the difference." Robert Frost
Actually I implied that...Barfo I really expect you to pay more attention.
Well, no - actually you flat out stated that Sheed never stepped up. But Red Hot, by quoting you, and Minstrel, and suggesting that Minstrel was wrong when he said you were wrong, implied "it", where "it" is the mistaken argument that average stats prove anything about whether he ever came up big in the playoffs.
Well, no - actually you flat out stated it. Red Hot, by quoting you, and Minstrel, and suggesting that Minstrel was wrong when he said you were wrong, implied it.
barfo
Well...you used the word "implied" so I was just using your lingo and not following your string of thoughts posted above. Implied, stated whatever frankly it doesn't matter..you got my point and I got yours.
BASEBALL FANS!! Visit our sister site at: http://www.baseballforum.com/ "I took the road less traveled by, and that has made all the difference." Robert Frost
Well...you used the word "implied" so I was just using your lingo and not following your string of thoughts posted above. Implied, stated whatever frankly it doesn't matter..you got my point and I got yours.
BASEBALL FANS!! Visit our sister site at: http://www.baseballforum.com/ "I took the road less traveled by, and that has made all the difference." Robert Frost
My apologies but IMO...a "good person" treats everyone with respect not just his family members and friends.
The underpriviledged that he's helped in two cities all count as "family and friends?"
If you're telling me that a good person is never disrespectful to anyone, I disagree with you. With no context as to when he was "rude" (in your friend's eyes), I have no way to evaluate that. I do evaluate his being charitable with his time and money, and being a caring father as qualities of a good person.
__________________ Nothing ever burns down by itself
Every fire needs a little bit of help
Give the anarchist a cigarette.
The underpriviledged that he's helped in two cities all count as "family and friends?"
If you're telling me that a good person is never disrespectful to anyone, I disagree with you. With no context as to when he was "rude" (in your friend's eyes), I have no way to evaluate that. I do evaluate his being charitable with his time and money, and being a caring father as qualities of a good person.
To say beung charitable makes someone a "good person" is just silly...so anyone who donates money to a couple of charities automatically becomes a "good person." That's a total farce IMO. How many criminals, crooks, embezzlers have donated money to charities? Are they all good people now?
Being good to those you care about (family, children etc) does not make you a "good person" but rather a good family man, father etc.
We each define what is good or bad in our own minds and you're certainly entitled to your oppinon in that regard.
For me it's a issue of giving each and every person a simple amount of respect, this was not important to Mr. Wallace in my eyes. Every Blazer I spent time around with the exception of Sheed and Bonzi was at least respectful to those around them 99% of the time.
BASEBALL FANS!! Visit our sister site at: http://www.baseballforum.com/ "I took the road less traveled by, and that has made all the difference." Robert Frost
To say beung charitable makes someone a "good person" is just silly...so anyone who donates money to a couple of charities automatically becomes a "good person." That's a total farce IMO. How many criminals, crooks, embezzlers have donated money to charities? Are they all good people now?
Being good to those you care about (family, children etc) does not make you a "good person" but rather a good family man, father etc.
I didn't say either automatically made him a good person. I said that those are qualities of a good person and are far more compelling to me than "my friend said he was sometimes rude."
Personally, I think people spuriously have decided Wallace is a bad person, and I think the verifiable evidence is more to the contrary, though I grant that it isn't conclusive.
Also, as a minor point, Wallace has given his time as well as money. I don't think there are very many crooks and embezzlers who willingly give their time to the less fortunate. Again, though, I'm not saying that it automatically makes him a good person...but it's highly creditable and weighs far more to the positive than the ocassional rudeness that you or your friend perceived weighs in the negative, in my opinion.
__________________ Nothing ever burns down by itself
Every fire needs a little bit of help
Give the anarchist a cigarette.
We each define what is good or bad in our own minds and you're certainly entitled to your oppinon in that regard.
Moral relativism - the root of our world's evil. We have for centuries defined good and bad by moral law (golden rule, Ten Commandments, etc.) not our own imagination. That's only happened the past 50 years or so.
__________________ Trail Blazers Fan since Walton was injured the first time!
OSU Beavers Alumni & Fan since Ralph Miller's Orange Express -
"Fans cheer when they have reason to." Stop the programmed noise!!
I didn't say either automatically made him a good person. I said that those are qualities of a good person and are far more compelling to me than "my friend said he was sometimes rude."
Personally, I think people spuriously have decided Wallace is a bad person, and I think the verifiable evidence is more to the contrary, though I grant that it isn't conclusive.
Also, as a minor point, Wallace has given his time as well as money. I don't think there are very many crooks and embezzlers who willingly give their time to the less
"100 reasons to love Rasheed Wallace"
I suppose I would now revise my statement to "hardly ever" raised his stats in the playoffs. Either way he never lead the team to winning a damn thing. That's beside the point though.
Trail Blazers Fan since Walton was injured the first time!