 |
|
05-26-2006, 11:57 PM
|
#76 (permalink)
|
|
All-Star
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: internet
Posts: 5,670
|
Re: For the Blazers? MORRISON
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by RW#30
He is a poor men's Dunleavy
|
Jr. or Sr.? 
__________________
I know what I know. - Paul Simon
I'm ALWAYS right and I NEVER lie. - George C. Tirebiter
Life is tough, it's tougher when you're stupid. - John Wayne
The United States is a nation of laws: badly written and randomly enforced. - Frank Zappa
You are responsible for your children until they are a credit to society. - Jovan Banjanin
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
05-27-2006, 01:28 AM
|
#77 (permalink)
|
|
Star
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Vancouver, WA
Age: 26
Posts: 3,299
|
Re: For the Blazers? MORRISON
Nate liked to run the high pick-and-roll fairly often ... this system would let Morrison get his shot off, regardless of athleticism. Or maybe he doesn't get the shot off because a defender is hassling him; instead, he passes it to the now open teammate for the easy bucket.
I have to admit ... I'm really conflicted about Morrison. Can't articulate why, but even reading through this thread ... it's a tough sell on either side of the fence. I guess we'll wait for the workout.
|
|
|
05-27-2006, 10:39 AM
|
#78 (permalink)
|
|
BasketballBoards Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,007
|
Re: For the Blazers? MORRISON
Morrison is an extremely talented offensive player, which would help Portland immensely. If he can play effective team defense, he will be an all-star. I expect him to be a Kiki Vandeweghe type player, who will have a fine career, but will never be an all-star.
He needs an athletic PF behind him to offset his lack of defense. A Randolph trade would be necessary to build around Adam.
__________________
"Luck is the residue of design" - Branch Rickey
|
|
|
05-27-2006, 11:08 AM
|
#79 (permalink)
|
|
Star
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Vancouver, WA
Age: 26
Posts: 3,299
|
Re: For the Blazers? MORRISON
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Blazer Maven
Morrison is an extremely talented offensive player, which would help Portland immensely. If he can play effective team defense, he will be an all-star. I expect him to be a Kiki Vandeweghe type player, who will have a fine career, but will never be an all-star.
He needs an athletic PF behind him to offset his lack of defense. A Randolph trade would be necessary to build around Adam.
|
If a fine career but no All-Star apperances is his ceiling, why would Portland take him with the number four? Why would ANYONE take him in the lottery?
|
|
|
05-27-2006, 11:56 AM
|
#80 (permalink)
|
|
All-Star
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: BlazerMania
Age: 22
Posts: 8,618
|
Re: For the Blazers? MORRISON
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by wastro
If a fine career but no All-Star apperances is his ceiling, why would Portland take him with the number four? Why would ANYONE take him in the lottery?
|
Cause thats just one persons opinion and not anywhere near a majority...
__________________
"I condemn remarks that are, in any way, viewed as anti-anything".
- John McCain
Rodney Stuckey is the future of the league.
|
|
|
05-27-2006, 01:34 PM
|
#81 (permalink)
|
|
Benchwarmer
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Huntington Beach
Age: 49
Posts: 244
|
Re: For the Blazers? MORRISON
The good news regarding the unfortunate bounces of the ping pong balls is that now Portland can AM w\o guilt or second guessing. IMHO - A match made in heaven. He will sell tons of tickets, and most importantly, his competitive demeanor will boost the talent that Portland does have. Definite all-star potential. I agree with the poster who said AM or Brandon Roy will be ROY next yr. I also think 2 of the 3 big men in the draft order may be NBA flops. UCLA's crummy big men dominated Tyrus Thomas in the tourney. 6' 9" Shot blocker - so what! Bargnani (next Dirk?) seems like a pretty safe pick. I like both of Florida's big men (not in draft) better than Thomas or Aldridge.
Good luck Blazers! Lived in Oregon for a long time and am very saddened that to see whats happened to the franchise due to a continuous stream of players with poor character. I remember the longest string of consecutive playoff appearances in history and consistent sellouts.
|
|
|
05-27-2006, 01:35 PM
|
#82 (permalink)
|
|
BasketballBoards Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,007
|
Re: For the Blazers? MORRISON
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by wastro
If a fine career but no All-Star apperances is his ceiling, why would Portland take him with the number four? Why would ANYONE take him in the lottery?
|
Rip Hamilton is not an all-star caliber SG, but he is a valuable member of a championship team. Would you say Rip was not worthy of a lottery-pick?
Jamaal Wilkes of the Lakers in a different era, a valuable scorer on an elite team.
I see Morrison fitting in better for Charlotte than Portland, but he will be a very good player.
__________________
"Luck is the residue of design" - Branch Rickey
|
|
|
05-27-2006, 01:38 PM
|
#83 (permalink)
|
|
Steal of the Draft
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Oregon
Age: 18
Posts: 8,021
|
Re: For the Blazers? MORRISON
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Sambonius
I say Rudy Gay.
|
Ditto
|
|
|
05-27-2006, 01:52 PM
|
#84 (permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Tualatin
Posts: 1,546
|
Re: For the Blazers? MORRISON
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Blazer Maven
I expect him to be a Kiki Vandeweghe type player, who will have a fine career, but will never be an all-star.
|
Kiki was an All-Star in both '83 and '84. If Morrison has Kiki-esque abilities I think taking him at #4 is a no-brainer.
My biggest worry would be passing on Rudy Gay's potential. Athletically, he's the best swing player in this draft and he already has a solid mid-range offensive game. He could end up a Tracy MacGrady-type player if he has internal motivation.
__________________
...it's largely an anonymous bunch. After the 21-year-old Webster torched the Jazz for 24 third-quarter points on Jan. 5, Utah reserve Matt Harpring observed, "It was tough when what's-his-face got hot."
|
|
|
05-27-2006, 01:58 PM
|
#85 (permalink)
|
|
-PREMIUM MEMBER-
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,065
|
Re: For the Blazers? MORRISON
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by RickRoss
Adam Morrison = poor mans Larry Bird
Brandon Roy = poor mans Derek Anderson
|
why do people compare him to Anderson. He is more like Aaron McKie. Anderson was smaller and quicker. Morrison is more like John Havlicek then Bird or Van Horn.
If the blazers make it to the finals Morrison will come up with a big steal to win the game.
Last edited by 2k : 05-27-2006 at 02:04 PM.
|
|
|
05-27-2006, 02:47 PM
|
#86 (permalink)
|
|
BasketballBoards Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: PDX
Age: 28
Posts: 1,440
|
Re: For the Blazers? MORRISON
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Blazer Maven
Rip Hamilton is not an all-star caliber SG, but he is a valuable member of a championship team. Would you say Rip was not worthy of a lottery-pick?
Jamaal Wilkes of the Lakers in a different era, a valuable scorer on an elite team.
I see Morrison fitting in better for Charlotte than Portland, but he will be a very good player.
|

|
|
|
05-27-2006, 04:14 PM
|
#87 (permalink)
|
|
BasketballBoards Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
|
Re: Gag me with a spoon
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Blazed
YUCK!
Morrison has the biggest bust factor of any of the top prospects. Morrison is probably the worst defender in the lottery (and he'll never get better), he's as one dimensional as a player can be and there are major concerns if his one dimension will even translate to the NBA. His exceptional lack of athleticism should scare most everyone.
Morrison is extremely lacking in the mental area, is extremely immature and he doesn't have the mental toughness that will be required in the NBA. After majorly choking and single handedly losing the UCLA game he broke down and cried like a little girl. I have never seen such an embarrassing display watching basketball. He He also has a major risk of injury due to his diabetes.
Rudy Gay is a much better NBA prospect and not only does he actually play defense, but he dominates while doing so. Morrison would have to score 40 a night to make up for his ineptitude on defense.
|
did u actually watch uconn?
gay was an embarassment on the defensive end..
|
|
|
05-27-2006, 04:44 PM
|
#88 (permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Back on the Warpath.
Posts: 1,614
|
Re: For the Blazers? MORRISON
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Blazed
Originally Posted by Blazed
YUCK!
Morrison has the biggest bust factor of any of the top prospects. Morrison is probably the worst defender in the lottery (and he'll never get better), he's as one dimensional as a player can be and there are major concerns if his one dimension will even translate to the NBA. His exceptional lack of athleticism should scare most everyone.
Morrison is extremely lacking in the mental area, is extremely immature and he doesn't have the mental toughness that will be required in the NBA. After majorly choking and single handedly losing the UCLA game he broke down and cried like a little girl. I have never seen such an embarrassing display watching basketball. He He also has a major risk of injury due to his diabetes.
Rudy Gay is a much better NBA prospect and not only does he actually play defense, but he dominates while doing so. Morrison would have to score 40 a night to make up for his ineptitude on defense.
|
Man what color is the sky in your world?
I'd love to pick apart your outrageous post bit by bit, but I'm sure others have beaten me to it in the last few days. I will say -- AGAIN -- I'd rather have a guy who has 3 years of solid NCAA experience (or maxed out his NCAA eligibility) rather than someone like Gay (or Aldridge or Thomas) that have less experience at that level. The Blazers have been TOO caught up in that the last few years, dazzled by someone's "upside" or "potential" instead of experience and sometimes (not always) having it go unrewarded.
__________________
-----------------------------
Blog be here
|
|
|
05-27-2006, 05:06 PM
|
#89 (permalink)
|
|
Equipped Managment
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Klamath Falls
Age: 44
Posts: 1,484
|
Re: For the Blazers? MORRISON
I say if he's there grab him. If he averages mid 20's he'd be even with
Redd,
Ray Allen,
carmelo,
Dirk,
Pierce,
Brand,
Mcgrady,
Carter
Richardson.
How many more games would the Blazers have won this year with 15 points more per game average from either the SF or the SG? With Viktor, Joel and Theo we have a contending front on defense. If our backcourt gets back before their opponent's and scores a decent average Rip City will rise from the ashes!!
Morrison couldn't be a bigger liability on defense then Zach.
If he's as good and puts up 23-25 points a game he's worth the pick.
|
|
|
|