Reply

Old 08-01-2006, 09:27 AM   #1 (permalink)
Trader Ed
Just looking
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Salem, OR
Age: 47
Posts: 11,878
Credits: 18,486.06
Rep Power: 416069 Trader Ed has disabled reputation
Jamaal as your starting PF?

I wonder if Jamaal would be a choice as a starting PF for us. This allows us to deal Miles with Zach. This keeps both Jamaal and Joel happy. Remember Jamaal was an all-star. Zach has not been one yet.


A popular NY trade idea... with a bit of a new twist... Keep the all-star Magloire and deal Zach to give NY incentive to deal Rose and his expiring contract...

Zach, Miles and Dickau for Jalen + Lee

PG Jack, Rodriquez, (Roy)
SG Roy, Webster, Dixon
SF Rose, (Webster), Outlaw
PF Magloire, Aldridge, Lee
C Przybilla, (Aldridge), LeFrentz

Do you see Jamaal as a starting PF for us?
__________________
"The whole is greater than the sum of its parts..."

Heart, desire and hustle! Its the fire within that makes a champion.

Last edited by Trader Ed : 08-01-2006 at 09:40 AM.
Trader Ed is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 

Old 08-01-2006, 09:33 AM   #2 (permalink)
SheedSoNasty
We Got Next.
 
SheedSoNasty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 6,397
Credits: 1,554.37
Rep Power: 21319045 SheedSoNasty has a reputation beyond repute SheedSoNasty has a reputation beyond repute SheedSoNasty has a reputation beyond repute SheedSoNasty has a reputation beyond repute SheedSoNasty has a reputation beyond repute SheedSoNasty has a reputation beyond repute SheedSoNasty has a reputation beyond repute SheedSoNasty has a reputation beyond repute SheedSoNasty has a reputation beyond repute SheedSoNasty has a reputation beyond repute SheedSoNasty has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Jamaal as your starting PF?

You left Lamarcus Aldridge off your depth chart... Where does he get minutes?
__________________
We Believe In Brandon Roy (PM to Join!):

~ SheedSoNasty ~ BlazeTop ~ handclap problematic ~ Draco ~ Target ~ drexlersdad ~ Stugots
~ PhilK ~ bruindre ~ ehizzy3 ~ dwood615 ~ GottahaveyourPAUGASOL ~ Benis007 ~ dudleysghost ~ TheBigDonut ~ MAS Rip City ~ Blazers2121 ~ Trailblazed&Confused ~ ProudBFan ~ Utherhimo ~ Stanthecaddy22 ~ ThePrideOfClyde ~ Talkhard ~ Blazer Freak ~ LameR ~ OnTheRocks ~ BiggaAdams~ ptownblazer1 ~ B_&_B ~ ChadWick ~ World B. Free
SheedSoNasty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2006, 09:36 AM   #3 (permalink)
ebott
Star
 
ebott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 2,537
Rep Power: 0 ebott has a reputation beyond repute ebott has a reputation beyond repute ebott has a reputation beyond repute ebott has a reputation beyond repute ebott has a reputation beyond repute ebott has a reputation beyond repute ebott has a reputation beyond repute ebott has a reputation beyond repute ebott has a reputation beyond repute ebott has a reputation beyond repute ebott has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Jamaal as your starting PF?

First off, Jamal was only an all-star because he was playing center in a centerless Eastern Conference. If he was playing power forward he would not have made the team because of Jermaine O'neal and Kenyon Martin. Jamal could possibly be an all-star again at center because of how weak the center position is in today's NBA. But he'd never make it as a Power Forward.

Playing Jamal as a power forward is an option. And there will be times that we have him on the floor with Joel. But remember this. Zach Randolph is our best player. The second best player isn't close. You don't dump a guy like Zach Randolph so a guy like Jamal can play power forward. That's just crazy talk.
ebott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2006, 09:37 AM   #4 (permalink)
Blazer Ringbearer
Supporting Jerk
 
Blazer Ringbearer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 4,137
Credits: 6,081.65
Rep Power: 856809 Blazer Ringbearer has a reputation beyond repute Blazer Ringbearer has a reputation beyond repute Blazer Ringbearer has a reputation beyond repute Blazer Ringbearer has a reputation beyond repute Blazer Ringbearer has a reputation beyond repute Blazer Ringbearer has a reputation beyond repute Blazer Ringbearer has a reputation beyond repute Blazer Ringbearer has a reputation beyond repute Blazer Ringbearer has a reputation beyond repute Blazer Ringbearer has a reputation beyond repute Blazer Ringbearer has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Jamaal as your starting PF?

We get a lot worse in the deal, but it does trim the hell out of the cap and secures us back into the Oden sweepstakes.

If you're going to give up that much talent for expiring contracts, I would hope you're getting more than just David Lee - maybe Frye, Nate Robinson, Ariza or some first rounders IN ADDITION. I mean, it's Isiah Thomas we're talking about - there's no excuse to get fleeced.

The biggest problem is if you don't get Oden and Jamaal leaves for nothing, you might be pretty weak up front - especially in terms of scoring.

Ultimately, I don't like it though because unless we luck into Oden, I think it sets us back another couple of years. I have no confidence that we'll be able to pick up a top free agent even if we are significantly under the cap.

You forgot about Aldridge in your lineups, btw.
Blazer Ringbearer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2006, 09:39 AM   #5 (permalink)
B_&_B
Burp!
 
B_&_B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: RIP CITY
Posts: 9,649
Credits: 321,862.25
Rep Power: 1686520 B_&_B has a reputation beyond repute B_&_B has a reputation beyond repute B_&_B has a reputation beyond repute B_&_B has a reputation beyond repute B_&_B has a reputation beyond repute B_&_B has a reputation beyond repute B_&_B has a reputation beyond repute B_&_B has a reputation beyond repute B_&_B has a reputation beyond repute B_&_B has a reputation beyond repute B_&_B has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Jamaal as your starting PF?

IMO, no way Jamaal starts over Zach. We need offense, and Zach gives us that. Zach has been working hard, he'll be rewarded with the starting job. But I'm sure Nate will let him know that if he slips up, Jamaal is waiting to take it.
__________________


"People say we are coming, but I almost think it's to the point where we are here," he said. "I think it's no longer coming. We are here now."... Brandon Roy.
B_&_B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2006, 09:40 AM   #6 (permalink)
Trader Ed
Just looking
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Salem, OR
Age: 47
Posts: 11,878
Credits: 18,486.06
Rep Power: 416069 Trader Ed has disabled reputation
Re: Jamaal as your starting PF?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SheedSoNasty
You left Lamarcus Aldridge off your depth chart... Where does he get minutes?
oops.. fixed it....
__________________
"The whole is greater than the sum of its parts..."

Heart, desire and hustle! Its the fire within that makes a champion.
Trader Ed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2006, 09:50 AM   #7 (permalink)
mook
All-Star
 
mook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: munch munch munch
Posts: 8,264
Credits: 22,505.62
Rep Power: 2479826 mook has a reputation beyond repute mook has a reputation beyond repute mook has a reputation beyond repute mook has a reputation beyond repute mook has a reputation beyond repute mook has a reputation beyond repute mook has a reputation beyond repute mook has a reputation beyond repute mook has a reputation beyond repute mook has a reputation beyond repute mook has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Jamaal as your starting PF?

you know, that's really not such a bad deal. between Lee and Aldridge, one of them is probably going to be at least as good as Randolph in a couple of years anyway. and it likely gets us a top 4 pick in a supposedly fantastic draft year, so even if we don't get Oden we'll come out all right.

we'd be sacrificing 10-15 wins to:
a) get rid of every bad contract on the team except for Raef
b) get a shot at oden
c) get Lee

hopefully, Magloire re-signs with us, or we do a sign-and-trade in another deal because we decide that Aldridge or Lee is a lot more ready to play right now than most people think.
mook is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2006, 09:54 AM   #8 (permalink)
Blazer Ringbearer
Supporting Jerk
 
Blazer Ringbearer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 4,137
Credits: 6,081.65
Rep Power: 856809 Blazer Ringbearer has a reputation beyond repute Blazer Ringbearer has a reputation beyond repute Blazer Ringbearer has a reputation beyond repute Blazer Ringbearer has a reputation beyond repute Blazer Ringbearer has a reputation beyond repute Blazer Ringbearer has a reputation beyond repute Blazer Ringbearer has a reputation beyond repute Blazer Ringbearer has a reputation beyond repute Blazer Ringbearer has a reputation beyond repute Blazer Ringbearer has a reputation beyond repute Blazer Ringbearer has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Jamaal as your starting PF?

What would this bring our payroll down to next offseason (without Magloire)?

Would there be any other Blazer free-agents that we would need to be picking up next offseason?
Blazer Ringbearer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2006, 10:01 AM   #9 (permalink)
GOD
Star
 
GOD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Portland
Posts: 4,738
Credits: 8,185.13
Rep Power: 1887252 GOD has a reputation beyond repute GOD has a reputation beyond repute GOD has a reputation beyond repute GOD has a reputation beyond repute GOD has a reputation beyond repute GOD has a reputation beyond repute GOD has a reputation beyond repute GOD has a reputation beyond repute GOD has a reputation beyond repute GOD has a reputation beyond repute GOD has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Jamaal as your starting PF?

No friggen way. Zach is better then Everyone else mentioned in this thread by a fair amount. The only player who may turn out equal or better then Randolph is LaMarcus. I am sick of seeing the Blazers lose. The Blazers are not going to be good this year, but at least they will win a few more then last year. With the proposed trade, I would be surprised if the Blazers won 20 games. Lee is not good.
GOD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2006, 10:47 AM   #10 (permalink)
Ed O
Legend
 
Ed O's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 16,001
Credits: 8,574.90
Rep Power: 1596635 Ed O has a reputation beyond repute Ed O has a reputation beyond repute Ed O has a reputation beyond repute Ed O has a reputation beyond repute Ed O has a reputation beyond repute Ed O has a reputation beyond repute Ed O has a reputation beyond repute Ed O has a reputation beyond repute Ed O has a reputation beyond repute Ed O has a reputation beyond repute Ed O has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Jamaal as your starting PF?

Magloire would be out of position at the 4, and the team would be much worse for the foreseeable future. Saving Paul Allen some money isn't a good enough reason to make a trade, IMO.

Ed O.
__________________
"In the end, it all comes down to talent. You can talk all you want about intangibles, I just don't know what that means. Talent makes winners, not intangibles. Can nice guys win? Sure, nice guys can win -- if they're nice guys with a lot of talent. Nice guys with a little talent finish fourth, and nice guys with no talent finish last."

-- Sandy Koufax
Ed O is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2006, 10:48 AM   #11 (permalink)
cimalee
Star
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Richmond , Virginia
Age: 26
Posts: 4,364
Credits: 3,799.43
Rep Power: 386738 cimalee has a reputation beyond repute cimalee has a reputation beyond repute cimalee has a reputation beyond repute cimalee has a reputation beyond repute cimalee has a reputation beyond repute cimalee has a reputation beyond repute cimalee has a reputation beyond repute cimalee has a reputation beyond repute cimalee has a reputation beyond repute cimalee has a reputation beyond repute cimalee has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Jamaal as your starting PF?

no hes a 6 leave him at that . Zach starts hes the best player .
__________________
But it's not about how hard you hit, it's about how hard you get hit and keep moving forward
cimalee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2006, 11:21 AM   #12 (permalink)
Blazer Maven
BasketballBoards Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,007
Credits: 2,510.53
Rep Power: 693233 Blazer Maven has a reputation beyond repute Blazer Maven has a reputation beyond repute Blazer Maven has a reputation beyond repute Blazer Maven has a reputation beyond repute Blazer Maven has a reputation beyond repute Blazer Maven has a reputation beyond repute Blazer Maven has a reputation beyond repute Blazer Maven has a reputation beyond repute Blazer Maven has a reputation beyond repute Blazer Maven has a reputation beyond repute Blazer Maven has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Jamaal as your starting PF?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trader Bob
A popular NY trade idea... with a bit of a new twist... Keep the all-star Magloire and deal Zach to give NY incentive to deal Rose and his expiring contract...

Zach, Miles and Dickau for Jalen + Lee
No way. Zach is a quality player (overpaid yes) in the league and has value. A salary dump of Zach makes no sense and would devastate this team.

I think the following would work: Zach + 07 and 09 picks to NJ for Richard Jefferson. You could swap the 09 pick for Webster and it would also work.
__________________
"Luck is the residue of design" - Branch Rickey
Blazer Maven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2006, 11:32 AM   #13 (permalink)
SheedSoNasty
We Got Next.
 
SheedSoNasty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 6,397
Credits: 1,554.37
Rep Power: 21319045 SheedSoNasty has a reputation beyond repute SheedSoNasty has a reputation beyond repute SheedSoNasty has a reputation beyond repute SheedSoNasty has a reputation beyond repute SheedSoNasty has a reputation beyond repute SheedSoNasty has a reputation beyond repute SheedSoNasty has a reputation beyond repute SheedSoNasty has a reputation beyond repute SheedSoNasty has a reputation beyond repute SheedSoNasty has a reputation beyond repute SheedSoNasty has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Jamaal as your starting PF?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blazer Maven
No way. Zach is a quality player (overpaid yes) in the league and has value. A salary dump of Zach makes no sense and would devastate this team.

I think the following would work: Zach + 07 and 09 picks to NJ for Richard Jefferson. You could swap the 09 pick for Webster and it would also work.
That's even worse than the original trade. Jefferson is way overrated and swapping Webster along with Zach and a pick is just silly.
__________________
We Believe In Brandon Roy (PM to Join!):

~ SheedSoNasty ~ BlazeTop ~ handclap problematic ~ Draco ~ Target ~ drexlersdad ~ Stugots
~ PhilK ~ bruindre ~ ehizzy3 ~ dwood615 ~ GottahaveyourPAUGASOL ~ Benis007 ~ dudleysghost ~ TheBigDonut ~ MAS Rip City ~ Blazers2121 ~ Trailblazed&Confused ~ ProudBFan ~ Utherhimo ~ Stanthecaddy22 ~ ThePrideOfClyde ~ Talkhard ~ Blazer Freak ~ LameR ~ OnTheRocks ~ BiggaAdams~ ptownblazer1 ~ B_&_B ~ ChadWick ~ World B. Free
SheedSoNasty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2006, 05:37 PM   #14 (permalink)
Yega1979
Star
 
Yega1979's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Oregon
Age: 100
Posts: 2,699
Credits: 13,307.92
Rep Power: 702774 Yega1979 has a reputation beyond repute Yega1979 has a reputation beyond repute Yega1979 has a reputation beyond repute Yega1979 has a reputation beyond repute Yega1979 has a reputation beyond repute Yega1979 has a reputation beyond repute Yega1979 has a reputation beyond repute Yega1979 has a reputation beyond repute Yega1979 has a reputation beyond repute Yega1979 has a reputation beyond repute Yega1979 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Jamaal as your starting PF?

Jamaal could only start at PF for a high scoring team, that just needs a brute rebounder at PF. But replacing Zach with Jamal at PF would make us the worst scoring team in history. Neither Jamal nor Joel have offensive skill beyond dunking.
Yega1979 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off