View Poll Results: Would You Want To Trade Miles for Richardson?

Yes 62 69.66%
No 27 30.34%
Voters: 89. You may not vote on this poll

Reply

Old 08-10-2006, 07:25 PM   #46 (permalink)
Blazer Freak
Steal of the Draft
 
Blazer Freak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Oregon
Age: 18
Posts: 8,021
Credits: 107.57
Rep Power: 21474849 Blazer Freak has a reputation beyond repute Blazer Freak has a reputation beyond repute Blazer Freak has a reputation beyond repute Blazer Freak has a reputation beyond repute Blazer Freak has a reputation beyond repute Blazer Freak has a reputation beyond repute Blazer Freak has a reputation beyond repute Blazer Freak has a reputation beyond repute Blazer Freak has a reputation beyond repute Blazer Freak has a reputation beyond repute Blazer Freak has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Blazers-Knicks

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blazers8
U got a point. I don't want to get rid of Mags...If we have to give up Mags to get rid of Miles I'd rather just keep Miles...
I wouldn't. That is most likely the reason we got Magloire, to give us more versitility in trades during the season. Meaning that if we add Magloire in with Darius, we might actually get a quality offer, or some team that is close to making it to the playoffs, will take on Darius to get a quality player like Jamaal.

I'd do Q and Taylor for Darius and Magloire.

Taylor's contract expires, and he could easily fill in spot minutes or just ride the bench as he is accustomed to doing. And Q, no matter what, will be a much better player to have on the team than Darius.
__________________

Blazer Freak is online now   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 

Old 08-12-2006, 07:22 AM   #47 (permalink)
BlazerWookie
Benchwarmer
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Lebanon, Oregon
Age: 42
Posts: 208
Credits: 25.00
Rep Power: 260117 BlazerWookie has a reputation beyond repute BlazerWookie has a reputation beyond repute BlazerWookie has a reputation beyond repute BlazerWookie has a reputation beyond repute BlazerWookie has a reputation beyond repute BlazerWookie has a reputation beyond repute BlazerWookie has a reputation beyond repute BlazerWookie has a reputation beyond repute BlazerWookie has a reputation beyond repute BlazerWookie has a reputation beyond repute BlazerWookie has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Blazers-Knicks

Only as a last resort. Richardson is a knucklehead, but he's nowhere near the knucklehead Darius is. I'm still hoping against all hope that somehow, some way, we can end up with Desmond Mason for Miles.
__________________
Mmmmmmm... Roast Ewok...

I was in the studio with Mike and Mike during Courtside Monday Night! Neener, Neener, Neener!
BlazerWookie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2006, 10:11 AM   #48 (permalink)
Anonymous Gambler
I only know that I know 0
 
Anonymous Gambler's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 749
Credits: 2,099.76
Rep Power: 2902917 Anonymous Gambler has a reputation beyond repute Anonymous Gambler has a reputation beyond repute Anonymous Gambler has a reputation beyond repute Anonymous Gambler has a reputation beyond repute Anonymous Gambler has a reputation beyond repute Anonymous Gambler has a reputation beyond repute Anonymous Gambler has a reputation beyond repute Anonymous Gambler has a reputation beyond repute Anonymous Gambler has a reputation beyond repute Anonymous Gambler has a reputation beyond repute Anonymous Gambler has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Blazers-Knicks

Quote:
Originally Posted by bircan
guys, richardson while streaky, is a definite shooter. Those 35% fg stats are misleading, especially with the playing time and situation for him with the knicks last season, not to mention his brothers shooting....

Q is a real team player, thats got to be worth something. 3pt is hot, i believe q rich has it in him to become a 45%fg, and greater than 40%3pt shooter. Very good rebounding at SF, and a well developed body.

If this trade comes along, and im the GM, id want q rich rather miles. hell, he can be a team player who encourages the likes of roy, jack and webster, blazers will come much happier in team morale and structure with this. my thoughts.
If not by stats, then how else can you show Q to be a good shooter. His shooting percentage was decent his first two years and horrendous the next four years. He's never hit 80% from the free throw line or 40% from the 3.

I'm in the minority, but I'd rather have Miles. Call him an underacheiver, but his career stats in just about everything are better than Q's.
Anonymous Gambler is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


VerticalSports
Baseball Forum Golf Forum Boxing Forum Snowmobile Forum
Basketball Forum Soccer Forum MMA Forum PWC Forum
Football Forum Cricket Forum Wrestling Forum ATV Forum
Hockey Forum Vollyball Forum Paintball Forum Snowboarding Forum
Tennis Forum Rugby Forums Lacrosse Forum Skiing Forums
Copyright (C) Verticalscope Inc Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007, PixelFX Studios