It's_GO_Time

I don't know what he is guilty of, but he is gulity of something. On the court, Zach has shown his dedication to the game. Off the court Zach is a thug and a liar. He is into guns, dog fights, running around with people who disregard the law, and shows a complete disrespect of his responsiblities as the highest paid player on the team.

My court of public opinion says Zach doesn't care if what he does is legal or not, he just cares if he gets caught.

All that being said, I don't want to see him traded unless it improves the team.

Mr. Chuck Taylor

I agree...it just sounded like PBF was already finding Zach guilty for this instance. I think this reaffirms our beliefs that he is trouble off the court, but you can't call him guilty for any crime yet.

__________________
Ready, set....G.O.!

It's_GO_Time

I'll even take it a step further and guess (based on what's out there) that Zach didn't commit a sexual assualt. I'm guessing the friend probabaly didn't commit a sexual assualt (as defined by law).

My stab in the dark: a sex fest in the hotel that went bad by either Zach not paying enough (or what the women thought they should have been paid) or that the friend got rougher than the woman expected and it turned into the women thinking she was wronged . . . asking for money to make it right and then taking it to the police when Zach wouldn't compenstate them for the "wrong doing".

I tend to think that the woman would not have taken it to the police unless she was really upset, felt that she was wronged and wasn't going to stand for it v. just taking it to the police because the threat didn't pan out. Of course there is always the possibility she was sexually assualted.

I love to speculate.

mook

man, this thread is brutal. page after page of basically no facts beyond:

a. Randolph hired some women to have sex.

b. Randolph hired a lawyer.

if I missed something in there, somebody please add to the list. it's too dreary for me to want to devote much time to.

barfo

barfo