 |
|
02-14-2008, 03:21 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
|
Star
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,514
|
Re: Cavs looking at Jack?
Quote:
Originally Posted by mediocre man
I'd take Daniel Gibson, a draft pick, a trade exception, or future a future pick for the human turnover
|
I was just thinking about this. The Cavs have David Wesley's $1.75 million trade exception. Say we acquire this for Jack.
Can we then use the same TE as a trading piece in another deal?
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
02-14-2008, 03:21 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
|
Star
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
Posts: 3,565
|
Re: Cavs looking at Jack?
Quote:
Originally Posted by c_note
Pavolovic sure would look good in a Blazer uni.
He's not a great shooter, but he's very athletic and has a high bball IQ.
Would be a steal for the Blazers.
|
SI's Anti-All-Star reserves
Quote:
|
F: Sasha Pavlovic, Cavaliers -- After failing to re-sign with Cleveland until Nov. 1, Pavlovic has given more than a few Cavs fans reason to wish he had remained a holdout. The 24-year-old's attack on shooting accuracy from the floor (35.1 percent) and from behind the arc (28.4 percent) was stopped by a foot injury sustained in late January. LeBron James and Co. can only hope his next return to the lineup is a happier one.
|
Maybe a good deal on damaged goods? Doesn't look very appealing though.
|
|
|
02-14-2008, 03:22 PM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
|
Schilster Supreme
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lake Wilsonwood
Posts: 13,607
|
Re: Cavs looking at Jack?
Trade exception and a draft pick IMO.
|
|
|
02-14-2008, 03:35 PM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
|
Star
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,320
|
Re: Cavs looking at Jack?
Quote:
Originally Posted by yuyuza1
I was just thinking about this. The Cavs have David Wesley's $1.75 million trade exception. Say we acquire this for Jack.
Can we then use the same TE as a trading piece in another deal?
|
You can't combine exceptions when making a trade. IIRC, if we traded Jack away say for a future pick, we'd get a TE in the amount of Jack's salary this year ($1.2 mil) which could be used to trade for another player making not more than 125% plus $100K of that amount. Not much chance of adding anything of consequence for that kind of money.
__________________
Blazermania is BACK!!!
|
|
|
02-14-2008, 03:37 PM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
|
Player
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 648
|
Re: Cavs looking at Jack?
jack/miles for snow/and one of newble/brown (expiring)
|
|
|
02-14-2008, 03:42 PM
|
#21 (permalink)
|
|
Star
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,514
|
Re: Cavs looking at Jack?
Quote:
Originally Posted by e_blazer1
You can't combine exceptions when making a trade. IIRC, if we traded Jack away say for a future pick, we'd get a TE in the amount of Jack's salary this year ($1.2 mil) which could be used to trade for another player making not more than 125% plus $100K of that amount. Not much chance of adding anything of consequence for that kind of money.
|
Thanks, but I didn't say trade Jack for a pick and create a TE. I said trade Jack for the Cavs' existing TE. Can we then use that TE to acquire another player from a different team?
|
|
|
02-14-2008, 03:49 PM
|
#22 (permalink)
|
|
Star
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,320
|
Re: Cavs looking at Jack?
Quote:
Originally Posted by yuyuza1
Thanks, but I didn't say trade Jack for a pick and create a TE. I said trade Jack for the Cavs' existing TE. Can we then use that TE to acquire another player from a different team?
|
It doesn't work that way. Teams get a TE anytime they take back less in salary than they send out. The TE isn't a tradeable commodity, it can just be used to acquire a player later that would have fit within the salary matching requirements of the CBA if it had been done originally as a 3-way deal. The CBA refers to these types of deals as non-simultaneous trades.
__________________
Blazermania is BACK!!!
|
|
|
02-14-2008, 03:54 PM
|
#23 (permalink)
|
|
Star
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,514
|
Re: Cavs looking at Jack?
Quote:
Originally Posted by e_blazer1
It doesn't work that way. Teams get a TE anytime they take back less in salary than they send out. The TE isn't a tradeable commodity, it can just be used to acquire a player later that would have fit within the salary matching requirements of the CBA if it had been done originally as a 3-way deal. The CBA refers to these types of deals as non-simultaneous trades.
|
That's what I wanted to know. Thanks.
|
|
|
02-14-2008, 03:59 PM
|
#24 (permalink)
|
|
Schilster Supreme
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lake Wilsonwood
Posts: 13,607
|
Re: Cavs looking at Jack?
Quote:
Originally Posted by e_blazer1
It doesn't work that way. Teams get a TE anytime they take back less in salary than they send out. The TE isn't a tradeable commodity, it can just be used to acquire a player later that would have fit within the salary matching requirements of the CBA if it had been done originally as a 3-way deal. The CBA refers to these types of deals as non-simultaneous trades.
|
Yes and no... The Cavs would use their Trade exception to acquire Jack which would then generate a Trade exception for us for Jacks salary value, since we wouldn't be taking salary back. We would then have 1 year to use it.
So while specifically now we wouldn't get their TE a new one would generate for us.
|
|
|
02-14-2008, 04:04 PM
|
#25 (permalink)
|
|
All-Star
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Portland Oregon
Age: 40
Posts: 7,207
|
Re: Cavs looking at Jack?
I believe Varejo would help the team out. He rebounds, defends. He would be a double digit rebounder if he got more minutes, but big Z eats most of them up.
__________________
Hasoos
|
|
|
02-14-2008, 04:05 PM
|
#26 (permalink)
|
|
Star
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,320
|
Re: Cavs looking at Jack?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Schilly
Yes and no... The Cavs would use their Trade exception to acquire Jack which would then generate a Trade exception for us for Jacks salary value, since we wouldn't be taking salary back. We would then have 1 year to use it.
So while specifically now we wouldn't get their TE a new one would generate for us.
|
I believe that's what I said above, Schilly.
Quote:
|
You can't combine exceptions when making a trade. IIRC, if we traded Jack away say for a future pick, we'd get a TE in the amount of Jack's salary this year ($1.2 mil) which could be used to trade for another player making not more than 125% plus $100K of that amount. Not much chance of adding anything of consequence for that kind of money.
|
But always good to have another capologist looking it over. 
__________________
Blazermania is BACK!!!
|
|
|
02-14-2008, 04:10 PM
|
#27 (permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Corvallis, OR
Age: 23
Posts: 1,939
|
Re: Cavs looking at Jack?
Varejo can't be traded until the summer because he signed too late into the season. He's a Cav until the summer at the earliest.
|
|
|
02-14-2008, 04:12 PM
|
#28 (permalink)
|
|
Schilster Supreme
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lake Wilsonwood
Posts: 13,607
|
Re: Cavs looking at Jack?
Quote:
Originally Posted by e_blazer1
I believe that's what I said above, Schilly.
But always good to have another capologist looking it over. 
|
Oops sorry, hadn't noticed your other explanation.
|
|
|
02-14-2008, 04:18 PM
|
#29 (permalink)
|
|
Star
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 2,537
|
Re: Cavs looking at Jack?
I see we're beating this dead horse again.
The only possible deal that appeals to me is ROYisR.O.Y.'s idea of using Jack to dump Miles. That would give us a real 9 mil in cap space for 2009 without having to dump anybody. Dump Channing Frye and Steve Blake and that's enough cap space for a max contract.
Oden/Przybilla
LaMarcus/Outlaw
Webster/?
Roy/Rudy
?/Sergio
Add in our picks the next two years and a top notch free agent and we're sittin pretty.
|
|
|
|