View Poll Results: Should Kings move out??

**DaUnbreakableKinG** · 08-11-2004, 12:43 AM

Should they move and go to another city or stay??

I believe they're having some problems with the arena so thats why I'm asking.

**DaUnbreakableKinG** · 08-11-2004, 12:44 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by DaUnbreakableKinG!
Should they move and go to another city or stay??

I voted yes because I believe they were talking about moving to KC and if they moved there I would be able to go see them live....

**Yao Mania** · 08-11-2004, 12:44 AM

The Governator should step in and fix it then

Quote:

Originally posted by DaUnbreakableKinG!

I voted yes because I believe they were talking about moving to KC and if they moved there I would be able to go see them live....

In that case I change my vote then, they should move up to Vancouver!
But seriously if I had the $$ to start/move a franchise KC would probably be my top choice

**Peja Vu** · 08-11-2004, 12:46 AM

Hell no. They have a loyal fan base. The arena issue will get worked out

**DaUnbreakableKinG** · 08-11-2004, 12:49 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Yao Mania!
The Governator should step in and fix it then

In that case I change my vote then, they should move up to Vancouver!
But seriously if I had the $$ to start/move a franchise KC would probably be my top choice

Why KC??

**Peja Vu** · 08-11-2004, 12:54 AM

This article is good and pretty much sums up my feelings:

Mark Kreidler: Arena issue is way too simple: Build it in Natomas already

Quote:

Not to put too fine a point on it, but the downtown arena conversation in Sacramento has been a festering sweat hole of mutual blame, flawed "studies," bad looks at City Council meetings and the always popular running game of Pin the Tail on the Bad Guy.

In short, it has been great. But since this is supposed to be about the future of the Kings in town rather than the theatrical value of it all, it's time to go in another direction.

And the winner is: The parking lot.

You know the one. It surrounds Arco Arena. It represents the scads of open land already owned by the Maloof companies. It is the silent footprint of a new building whose cost could be dramatically lower than a downtown site.

It sits in the middle of a Natomas area that anyone who has lived here for more than 12 minutes can tell you is absolutely exploding - houses, businesses, infrastructure.

The Kings need a new home? Listen, they don't even have to leave home.

Stop the shouting. Discontinue the whining. Negotiate in good faith.

Build it in Natomas. They'll continue to come.

**Yao Mania** · 08-11-2004, 12:58 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by DaUnbreakableKinG!

Why KC??

Just seems like they have a lively bball community there, correct me if I'm wrong?

**DaUnbreakableKinG** · 08-11-2004, 01:06 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Yao Mania!

Just seems like they have a lively bball community there, correct me if I'm wrong?

I agree with you. I asked you because I thought you had some other reason.

SoCalfan21 · 08-11-2004, 10:11 PM

I know how to solve this problem.......just have 3 LA teams

**DaUnbreakableKinG** · 08-11-2004, 10:12 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SoCalfan21!
I know how to solve this problem.......just have 3 LA teams

haha, in the same arena.

View Poll Results: Should Kings move out??

Thread Tools Display Modes

Thread Tools

Display Modes