Petey

http://espn.go.com/nba/news/2002/0917/1433089.html

Ya guys lost Jones. Cleaves is or was hurt.

-Petey

SLiM9287

Do u think if cleaves would have stayed ther he woulve made an impact?

__________________
kbstat=slim9287

Cwebb787

First of all the Jon BArry and 1st Round Pick for Mateen cleaves t1 year ago was a bad trade in the 1st place. They lost a very very solid bench player that went along nicely wiht what they had, and gave up a chance to possibly get some nice talent last year in the draft. I know Mateen is talented, but there was absolutely no place for him in Sacramentok with Bobby Jackson and Bibby manning the point. I think Cleaves woulda thrived in Cleveland though, theres really no PG there, and he could step in and step up. This was more of a loss to Cleaves, then it was for the kings when the trade was revoked.


Dancing Banana-

Damian Necronamous

I totally agree...Cleaves may not have started in Cleveland, but he has some skills and he would've really helped them.

Atleast Sac-Town gets their number 1 cheerleader back!

__________________
Chick Hearn: This game is in the refrigerator. The door is closed, the lights are out, the eggs are gettin' cool, the butter's gettin' hard, and the jellooooooo's jigglin'!

Current 2008-2009 LA Lakers Roster
PG: Derek Fisher, Jordan Farmar
SG: Kobe Bryant, Sasha Vujacic, Sun Yue
SF: Vladimir Radmanovic, Trevor Ariza, Luke Walton
PF: Pau Gasol, Lamar Odom, Josh Powell
C: Andrew Bynum, Chris Mihm, D.J. Mbenga

Petey

I think the kings lost out, any time you trade a talent which is your 11th man, and get something better in return... down the road you can of course get more value then the first fella... it fell hard on the Kings I think. In the long run that is.

-Petey