 |
|
06-03-2006, 07:02 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
|
raaasho
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 12,236
|
Re: Shaun Livingston?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TheATLien
Do you really believe that the Clippers would trade Shaun Livingston for the #1 pick, Charlie Villanueva, and Mike James?
|
I'm almost 100% sure the Clips would take it and run.. As for the Raptors perspective on that trade, I won't even say anything.
__________________
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
06-03-2006, 07:15 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
|
BasketballBoards Player
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 609
|
Re: Shaun Livingston?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TheATLien
Do you really believe that the Clippers would trade Shaun Livingston for the #1 pick, Charlie Villanueva, and Mike James? I mean, c'mon.. Clippers just had a good playoff run. Shaun Livingston is still so young. They going to get rid of all that for Mike James, who Raptor fans don't even want back, and Charlie Villanueva, who some posters want traded? Your trade proposal is extremely unrealistic.
|
I like Livingston but give me a break. You wouldn't trade Livingston for ALL that? Now he's officially one of the most overrated players on this board. Last year's ROY runner-up, the top pick in this year's draft, and a 20/6 vet combo guard isn't enough? Wow... just wow.
The Clippers do this without even thinking.
__________________
"I'm just tired of being treated like a cheap prostitute" - Mike James
|
|
|
06-03-2006, 08:02 PM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
|
Star
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: windsor (basically detroit, just canada)
Age: 16
Posts: 3,145
|
Re: Shaun Livingston?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by vigilante
Why don't you explain it to me?
Wait.. I don't think you can, because you just got proved wrong.
|
Livingston is untouchable...
he has to much potential and clips really really want him to flourish.
he's vastly improved since last year and will simply be amazing if sam leaves next year
__________________
P-MAC IS *BACK*
|
|
|
06-03-2006, 08:02 PM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
|
Star
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: windsor (basically detroit, just canada)
Age: 16
Posts: 3,145
|
Re: Shaun Livingston?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by vigilante
I'm almost 100% sure the Clips would take it and run.. As for the Raptors perspective on that trade, I won't even say anything.
|
they wouldnt
__________________
P-MAC IS *BACK*
|
|
|
06-03-2006, 08:12 PM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
|
All-Star
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Rick Kamla Fan, Member #000001
Posts: 6,649
|
Re: Shaun Livingston?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by pmac34
Livingston is untouchable...
he has to much potential and clips really really want him to flourish.
he's vastly improved since last year and will simply be amazing if sam leaves next year
|
2004-05:
30 games, 27.1 MPG, .414 FG%, .000 3PT%, .746 FT%, 3.0 RPG, 5.0 APG, 2.5 TOPG, 1.1 SPG, 7.4 PPG
2005-06:
61 games, 25.0 MPG, .427 FG%, .125 3PT%, .688 FT%, 3.0 RPG, 4.5 APG, 1.8 TOPG, 0.8 SPG, 5.8 PPG
I don't want to fall onto the "Shaun Livingston is so overrated" crew but I can't stand having people constantly talk about how he's the next greatest PG since Magic Johnson. Thus far Shaun has shown nothing but being a one-dimensional player (passer) and a questionable work ethic as a reason for his long stretches of injuries over a two-year span.
Will he pan out? Maybe. He is still young after all and has alot of room for growth. But he isn't playing like an all-star (yet) nor does it look like he'll come close to it in the near future so please spare the "Shaun Livingston is untouchable" crap.
__________________
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Chuck Swirsky
The Raptors need to jack one off
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Chuck Swirsky
We love Dick...
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by vincedunkedonzo2
No I meant sg. I type really fast and carelessly ask anyone. I hate speeling and grammer. I only care about it in English where i got an A. What do you mean they are starting Parker.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by vincedunkedonzo2
I think Toronto's hate of Vince has a lot to do with Canada's hate of America. I totally agree if Vince wasnt on the Raps they would face the same fate as the Grizzlies they would be moved. Vince did not quit on you. You quit on Vince.
|
|
|
|
06-03-2006, 08:16 PM
|
#21 (permalink)
|
|
Star
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Mississauga, Ontario
Age: 22
Posts: 3,093
|
Re: Shaun Livingston?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by trick
2004-05:
30 games, 27.1 MPG, .414 FG%, .000 3PT%, .746 FT%, 3.0 RPG, 5.0 APG, 2.5 TOPG, 1.1 SPG, 7.4 PPG
2005-06:
61 games, 25.0 MPG, .427 FG%, .125 3PT%, .688 FT%, 3.0 RPG, 4.5 APG, 1.8 TOPG, 0.8 SPG, 5.8 PPG
I don't want to fall onto the "Shaun Livingston is so overrated" crew but I can't stand having people constantly talk about how he's the next greatest PG since Magic Johnson. Thus far Shaun has shown nothing but being a one-dimensional player (passer) and a questionable work ethic as a reason for his long stretches of injuries over a two-year span.
Will he pan out, sure. But he hasn't yet nor does it look like he'll come close to it in the near future so please spare the "Shaun Livingston is untouchable" crap.
|
agreed....the guy has talent without doubt, however he isnt worth the amount of talent that previous posters have suggested....what i get a kick out of is the fact that he has only shown flashes of talent during his short career, yet people would be willing to bet the bank in order to get him....its ironic that if a Euro 7 footer were to perform the exact same way, people would already be using the "BUST" title alongside his name....just some food for thought...
PS: Trick, add me to the Bargnani club...please and thank you...
__________________
Diversity, Our Strength...Lets Go Raptors
|
|
|
06-03-2006, 08:24 PM
|
#22 (permalink)
|
|
All-Star
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 6,847
|
Re: Shaun Livingston?
The #1 pick and the Clippers is not a good fit given Brand / Kaman.
|
|
|
06-03-2006, 08:35 PM
|
#23 (permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Halifax
Age: 30
Posts: 1,253
|
Re: Shaun Livingston?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by pmac34
Livingston is untouchable...
he has to much potential and clips really really want him to flourish.
he's vastly improved since last year and will simply be amazing if sam leaves next year
|
They'll hold on to him claiming his vast potential and 'Magic Johnson-like' qualities (he's tall, black and plays PG) for a few years. Because of his age, this will work. This will drive up his value well beyond his actual worth, then they will absolutely rob a team in a trade.
That is my prediction for Shaun Livingston and the Clippers.
What was the deal again, Charlie, Mike James and the #1 overall. And the Clippers wouldn't take it? There are maybe 10 players in the league who wouldn't be traded for that package, and Shaun Livingston isn't one of them. At this point, I wouldn't trade Charlie straight up for him, Charlie has shown more, has played a full season and is only one year older.
|
|
|
06-03-2006, 09:51 PM
|
#24 (permalink)
|
|
BasketballBoards Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: VT
Posts: 1,318
|
Re: Shaun Livingston?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by vigilante
I love Livingston and when it's all said and done I think he will be one of the greatest point guards to ever play the game.. BUT, passing on a Charlie, Bosh, Aldridge frontcourt would haunt me forever.
Although, here's an idea:
To LA: #1 pick
To Toronto: Shaun Livingston, Quinton Ross
Shaun Livingston
Morris Peterson
Charlie Villanueva
Chris Bosh
Nene
Not bad, but again.. the Aldridge frontcourt just intrigues me far too much.. With that said, if we are planning on picking Bargnani.. that changes everything.
|
I think you're overrating Livingston a little, but I agree that he has some serious potential. Like Calderon, he just needs to extend his range and get some more experience. Also, if we passed on Aldridge and took the Livingston trade, we could always sign a free agent like Joel Przybilla. Sure, the Thrilla Vanilla Gorilla isn't an All-Star center, but he blocks and rebounds and we'd have 3 potential All-Stars in Bosh, Villanueva and Livingston. Not to mention good roleplayers in MoPete, Graham, Calderon, Ukic, and Bonner.
I can't tell you how many potential lineups I've done in this forum, especially since we got the #1 pick...
PG: Livingston/Calderon
SG: Peterson/Ukic
SF: Villanueva/Graham
PF: Bosh/Bonner
C: Przybilla/Sow
Actually, that team reminds me of the current Clipper squad.
__________________
Toronto Raptors: 22-23
Dallas Cowboys: 9-8, eliminated by Seattle
|
|
|
06-04-2006, 11:08 AM
|
#25 (permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,474
|
Re: Shaun Livingston?
Shaun Livingston to the raptors makes no sense. Its about as probable as tayshawn prince to the raptors.
|
|
|
06-04-2006, 02:23 PM
|
#26 (permalink)
|
|
BasketballBoards Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2004
Age: 23
Posts: 2,215
|
Re: Shaun Livingston?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mo76
Shaun Livingston to the raptors makes no sense. Its about as probable as tayshawn prince to the raptors.
|
Why exactly does it not make sense to you? Some insight would really help....
|
|
|
06-04-2006, 02:51 PM
|
#27 (permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,474
|
Re: Shaun Livingston?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by adhir1
Why exactly does it not make sense to you? Some insight would really help....
|
hes a young player with potential that the clippers have no intention to move. Cassel isnt going to be around forever. I wouldnt have posted something so blatenly obvious, but you asked for it!!! What motivation would the clippers have to do this deal. Trade livingston and then look for a PG with less potential to develop behind cassel. There plan is to let livingston develop under cassel, not trade him when his trade value isnt even that high.
Last edited by mo76 : 06-04-2006 at 03:02 PM.
|
|
|
06-04-2006, 05:51 PM
|
#28 (permalink)
|
|
BasketballBoards Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2004
Age: 23
Posts: 2,215
|
Re: Shaun Livingston?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mo76
hes a young player with potential that the clippers have no intention to move. Cassel isnt going to be around forever. I wouldnt have posted something so blatenly obvious, but you asked for it!!! What motivation would the clippers have to do this deal. Trade livingston and then look for a PG with less potential to develop behind cassel. There plan is to let livingston develop under cassel, not trade him when his trade value isnt even that high.
|
so it doesnt make sense for the Clippers, but this isnt the Clippers forum this is the raptors forum, last time i checked....i simply thought that you meant it did not make sense from the Raptors perspective.
|
|
|
06-04-2006, 06:19 PM
|
#29 (permalink)
|
|
Star
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Any place but Bushland
Posts: 4,863
| |