lucky777s

We were just speaking about this and wondering why he was ever hired in the first place.

Probably a good move, although you never like constant turnover at the head coach spot.

Bucks need to run more of an inside-out offense using Bogut and Villy's passing skills to create easy looks for everyone.

lucky777s

Here is a link

http://www.nba.com/bucks/news/Stotts_070314.html

speedythief

I remember saying, at the time of his hiring, that it was the wrong move to make. Porter was looking like Mitchell looks this season--overachieving, had his players motivated, etc.. No surprise that it didn't work out for him or for Milwaukee.

Too much has been made over the injuries in Milwaukee. 20 or so games for Redd and Villanueva, plus the season for Simmons, is no excuse for their record. Bogut has played in 60+, as have Bell and Patterson. Williams has played 55, Skinner 58... the team is a lot better than 24 wins.

Ka-Bosh

He was never a good coach, and I was surprise when the Bucks hired him, because of his record. I guess the game against the Bucks just put it over the top. The Bucks have a lot of good players, and there's no way they should be this bad.

__________________
PM me if you want to join the Andrea Bargnani fan club

Members: Ka Bosh, iNdIaNa31PaCeRs, Junkyard Dog13, JS03, ronna_meade21, ddawg, ItalianStallion, SickGame, bootstrenf

SkywalkerAC

There are some decent coaches out on the market and this team is going to have the potential to do some damage next season. Simmons, Charlie V, along with a decent lottery pick should make a difference.

__________________
AC