 |
06-18-2004, 10:44 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
True Player
Join Date: May 2003
Age: 20
Posts: 996
Rep Power: 7
|
Trades?
#5 and Laetnner for Al harrington
I got really excited about this trade rumor when i heard about it, does anyone here know the chances of it happening?
#5 and Jarvis Hayes for #3 and filler
Really don't like this trade at all, but anyone know if it's truly not going to happen?
Any other trade rumors anyone know about?
__________________
Kwame, how can you not love him?
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
06-18-2004, 03:51 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Star
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD
Age: 24
Posts: 2,782
|
ive heard a sign and trade; stackhouse and kwame brown for kenyon martin.
i dont like that trade at all though.
|
|
|
06-18-2004, 04:25 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Star
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: VA
Age: 25
Posts: 2,982
|
I've heard Jiri Welsch and the #15 for #5. That trade sucks though.
Stack/Kwame for K-Mart would be a huge mistake. I would give them Stack/L8/#5 though.
__________________
SCREWED like Bret Hart!
|
|
|
06-18-2004, 08:13 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
True Player
Join Date: May 2003
Age: 20
Posts: 996
Rep Power: 7
|
News just in, Phil jackson leaves the lakers and shaq wants a trade........ Maybe im hanging out on a limb here, but our team has a great pool of young talent that the lakers may want, shaq would guarentee us 3 winning seasons at least, would u want him as a wizard?
__________________
Kwame, how can you not love him?
|
|
|
06-18-2004, 08:48 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
BasketballBoards Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: east side suburbs in MD
Posts: 92
Rep Power: 5
|
No, we would have to give up to much
__________________
Wiz, start showing some of your so called "potenial"!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
06-18-2004, 08:52 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
You mad Bill?
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Maryland
Age: 19
Posts: 8,503
|
Just as long as Arenas and Kwame aren't involved in the trade I would do it.
__________________
Favorite Wu-Tang Song? PM Me.
CP26 (Ice Cream), Sliccat (I Gotcha Back)
|
|
|
06-19-2004, 08:45 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
True Player
Join Date: May 2003
Age: 20
Posts: 996
Rep Power: 7
|
i was thinking like hughes, hayes, haywood, and the #5 for rush and shaq, or just shaq.
__________________
Kwame, how can you not love him?
|
|
|
06-19-2004, 02:28 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Star
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD
Age: 24
Posts: 2,782
|
shaq is going to make around 29 million next year.
hughes, haywood, and hayes make a combined 9 million.
|
|
|
06-20-2004, 02:18 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
True Player
Join Date: May 2003
Age: 20
Posts: 996
Rep Power: 7
|
dude we have like the 5th lowest payroll in the league, are u saying shaq is too much, or that it's too little for shaq?
__________________
Kwame, how can you not love him?
|
|
|
06-20-2004, 04:11 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Only khal-khalash.
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Northern Virginia Favorite Team: Wizards
Age: 25
Posts: 15,953
|
Quote:
Originally posted by <b>twinz2gether</b>!
dude we have like the 5th lowest payroll in the league, are u saying shaq is too much, or that it's too little for shaq?
|
It's way too little for him. You have to send out and receive almost the same amount of salary in a trade (can be 15% over/under) unless you are under the cap, in which case the amount you are under the cap can be added/subtracted to the total. I don't know what our exact situation is off the top of my head, but we definitely aren't $20 million under.
|
|
|
06-20-2004, 04:52 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
True Player
Join Date: May 2003
Age: 20
Posts: 996
Rep Power: 7
|
yeah $27 mil is a joke, but he is the most dominant player in the league, no way we could get him.
I really would like to get al harrington though.
__________________
Kwame, how can you not love him?
|
|
|
 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|