Quote:
Originally posted by jazzy1!
I find Jamison comments interesting.
He says he feels most comfortable playing the 4.
Where Kwame feels most comfortable.
Are we gonna have a conflict there. Kwame can play 5 and would be a good 5 if he starts understanding the weakside defensive principals.
I really hope we don't play alot of 4and 5 for Jamison and Kwame because our defense will collapse with a weaker 3 on the floor.
I'm glad to hear him say kwame can hit the jumper.
If Kwame recaptures the outside stroke this season he'll have a huge year.
Jamison should get used to banging at the 3 against smaller opponents and not worry about out quicking 4's. Because along with out quicking 4's comes getting out muscled by bigger 4's.
|
Well word around the grapevine is that Kwame has grew another inch or so over the summer and gained even more weight. I'm talking a legit 7'1, maybe up to 270 points. Compared to your typical 6'9-6'10 240 PF, Kwame is frigging HUGE.
Kwame will be able to overpower just about every PF in the league, or he'll be able to outquick every C in the league, so really it's good either way.
I think Kwame will play PF this year, even though Jamison might prefer PF, the fact is we need Jamison at SF. But, if we can get a real good SF, like for example if Jeffries can turn into a good defensive/roleplaying SF, than realistically, we could probably save alot of money next summer if Kwame moves to C. I really like Haywood, but after signing Etan for 6 years, drafting Ramos, and the fact that Kwame can play C, I'm not sure if it makes sense to give Haywood a big contract like we did with Etan.
Even if Kwame remains at PF, A future PF/C combination of Kwame/Ramos is just flatout bigger and more athletic than what any other team in the league can put out there.