 |
|
05-25-2007, 12:16 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Fairfax, VA
Posts: 6,119
|
Trading Jamison
Is it time to trade Jamison? I understand he is the leader in the lockeroom but I am not sold this team has the necessary post presense to win with Jamison at the 4, and I don't want to see Jamison play SF over Butler. Gil has to assume the mantle of team leader at some point, and if it means making the team better in the process, then that is what he is getting paid for.
http://chicagosports.chicagotribune....ulls-headlines
Sam Smith claims a possible Zach for Jamison deal. Would Randolph fit with the Wizards offense? I personally don't think so, but it makes me think it would be nice for the Wizards to parlay Jamison into a more traditional post player that would fit with the Wizards. Gasol? JO'neal? Garnett? Obviously I am not proclaim Jamison is equal in straight up, but his contract status adds value, as well as his ability to be a leader. If a team is going to dump a high priced player for someone who can help out for a year, has an expiring contract, and who will help mentor, then I think Jamison is perfect in that role. He has served the Wizards well, I just feel now is the time for them to contemplate the next step.
__________________
Where's the cake?
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
05-27-2007, 11:18 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Legend
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: DC Area
Age: 32
Posts: 17,152
|
Re: Trading Jamison
It's worth looking at. I wouldn't trade him for Randolph. The only I'd take him is if the Blazers took away Thomas. Even then the salaries don't match and I don't know that a suitable deal could be worked out.
Maybe something like Etan and Daniels for Randolph and Jarrett Jack. I seriously doubt the Blazers do that because Jack looks like a younger version of AD and Etan serves no purpose for them at all except to be rid of Randolph.
Sounds like a bad deal from Portland's perspective, doesn't it? Well it is, except here's the thing. They owe Randolph another $61M. They'd save $10M or so even taking on Thomas and AD. Not a huge amount, but $10M is still $10M. If they're desperate to be rid of Randolph that ought to be something.
I'd rather hold on to Jamison and hope to resign him for cheap.
|
|
|
05-30-2007, 11:36 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Star
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD
Age: 24
Posts: 2,700
|
Re: Trading Jamison
Trade Jamison for Kobe. 
|
|
|
05-31-2007, 10:13 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,200
|
Re: Trading Jamison
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by MikeDC
I'd rather hold on to Jamison and hope to resign him for cheap.
|
when someone says they think we should just keep jamison and try to resign him on the cheap i can only come to one conclusion... they enjoy being the 8th seed in the east and dont want to see the team get any better. The trio of arenas, jamison, and butler peaked at the beginning of last year. Even if all 3 of them somehow stay healthy for the entire season the best we can hope for is a 4/5 seed and a second round playoff exit. No combination of thomas, haywood,and daniels are going to bring this team any type of impact player (espically downlow). Heck ill even throw in roger mason jr and it still isnt getting us more than other teams trash. We all know grunfeld is a great GM but are we really gonna put all of our eggs into his "lets hope we can get a quality player with the MLE" basket?
|
|
|
05-31-2007, 06:24 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Star
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: São Bernardo, SP, Brasil
Age: 23
Posts: 2,770
|
Re: Trading Jamison
Jamison for Kirilenko?
__________________
Thrilled to reach the 2700th post! Coming with a
lot more of great trade ideas (the most beloved ones in this board), you can expect that!
Thanks to all members of this site, you guys are great.
|
|
|
06-01-2007, 07:25 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Star
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,632
|
Re: Trading Jamison
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by shyFX325
when someone says they think we should just keep jamison and try to resign him on the cheap i can only come to one conclusion... they enjoy being the 8th seed in the east and dont want to see the team get any better. The trio of arenas, jamison, and butler peaked at the beginning of last year. Even if all 3 of them somehow stay healthy for the entire season the best we can hope for is a 4/5 seed and a second round playoff exit. No combination of thomas, haywood,and daniels are going to bring this team any type of impact player (espically downlow). Heck ill even throw in roger mason jr and it still isnt getting us more than other teams trash. We all know grunfeld is a great GM but are we really gonna put all of our eggs into his "lets hope we can get a quality player with the MLE" basket?
|
Remember we were at the top of the East until the injuries started happening. I agree it's not a championship team cause the West is too strong, but we can win the East with a better bench.
|
|
|
06-01-2007, 10:37 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Legend
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: DC Area
Age: 32
Posts: 17,152
|
Re: Trading Jamison
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by shyFX325
when someone says they think we should just keep jamison and try to resign him on the cheap i can only come to one conclusion... they enjoy being the 8th seed in the east and dont want to see the team get any better. The trio of arenas, jamison, and butler peaked at the beginning of last year. Even if all 3 of them somehow stay healthy for the entire season the best we can hope for is a 4/5 seed and a second round playoff exit. No combination of thomas, haywood,and daniels are going to bring this team any type of impact player (espically downlow). Heck ill even throw in roger mason jr and it still isnt getting us more than other teams trash. We all know grunfeld is a great GM but are we really gonna put all of our eggs into his "lets hope we can get a quality player with the MLE" basket?
|
I'm not, but I also recognize that Jamison is a quality player. Trading quality for quality isn't going to vault us into contention either.
Honestly, we need to get lucky somehow. I'm not opposed to trading Jamison at all, but the sort of move the Wizards need is to somehow get a high quality player without giving up any of their existing high quality players.
Like, if they could get Randolph without giving up any of the big 3, that'd be pretty damn good.
|
|
|
06-04-2007, 09:57 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Star
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD
Age: 24
Posts: 2,700
|
Re: Trading Jamison
Jamison stock must have gone up considering how well he performed against the Cavs, and that Cleavland advanced to the finals with their stingy defense. Jamison got 32 ppg with 48% field goal percentage while the Wizards were swept 4-0. Some teams in the east may demand his services especially since he has an expiring contract.
|
|
|
06-04-2007, 11:10 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
how alive? too alive.
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Michigan
Age: 21
Posts: 6,586
|
Re: Trading Jamison
Jamison for Sheed?
__________________
"I'm not just saying we are going to do it my way, I'm just saying we are going to do it the Championship Way."
-Michael Curry
|
|
|
06-05-2007, 09:58 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
6th Man
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Phoenix, Arizona/Indianapolis, Indiana
Posts: 497
|
Re: Trading Jamison
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by f22egl
Trade Jamison for Kobe. 
|
LMAO thats like passing on oden to draft horford just something you dont do...but quality players but kobe/oden clearly have the edge.
__________________
Favorite Teams: Boston Celtics
, Phoenix Suns, Indiana Pacers, Houston Rockets, Portland Trailblazers
Favorite Players: Paul Pierce, Rafer Alston, Ray Allen, Tracy McGrady, Kevin Garnett, Brandon Roy, Ben Wallace, Chris Paul, Shawn Marion, Dikembe Mutombo
|
|
|
06-05-2007, 09:59 AM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
6th Man
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Phoenix, Arizona/Indianapolis, Indiana
Posts: 497
|
Re: Trading Jamison
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by XMATTHEWX
Jamison for Sheed?
|
NO, NO, NO,....i think your forgetting the part where Sheed is an over the hill all-star that complains, causes trouble, talks trash, gets technicals and ummm yea Jamison is better.
__________________
Favorite Teams: Boston Celtics
, Phoenix Suns, Indiana Pacers, Houston Rockets, Portland Trailblazers
Favorite Players: Paul Pierce, Rafer Alston, Ray Allen, Tracy McGrady, Kevin Garnett, Brandon Roy, Ben Wallace, Chris Paul, Shawn Marion, Dikembe Mutombo
|
|
|
06-05-2007, 10:00 AM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
6th Man
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Phoenix, Arizona/Indianapolis, Indiana
Posts: 497
|
Re: Trading Jamison
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Zuca
Jamison for Kirilenko?
|
NO WAY! AK-47 is wayyy overrated stupid trade. he gets hurt too much. and really isnt that good on the offensive end. maybe a package of like jarvis hayes and jamis for Jermaine O'Neal....huh huh?
__________________
Favorite Teams: Boston Celtics
, Phoenix Suns, Indiana Pacers, Houston Rockets, Portland Trailblazers
Favorite Players: Paul Pierce, Rafer Alston, Ray Allen, Tracy McGrady, Kevin Garnett, Brandon Roy, Ben Wallace, Chris Paul, Shawn Marion, Dikembe Mutombo
|
|
|
06-05-2007, 07:58 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
Star
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD
Age: 24
Posts: 2,700
|
Re: Trading Jamison
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TheTruth34
LMAO thats like passing on oden to draft horford just something you dont do...but quality players but kobe/oden clearly have the edge.
|
Yea I was just kidding. I posted that the day Kobe demanded to be traded. The Wizards would be lucky to get Kobe if they offered up Jamison, Butler, and possibly a pick.
|
|
|
06-06-2007, 11:47 AM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Fairfax, VA
Posts: 6,119
| |