Basel

http://www.WrestlingInc.com/wi/news/...#ixzz1wOekGVZY

__________________

XxIrvingxX

I seriously think this is a complete waste of a match for the following reasons.

1: We've seen these two face each other before. Lesnar's wrestlemania opponent should be a person who he has never faced before, is similar to him in some way, and isn't John Cena or the Rock.

2: Undertaker's done. His HIAC match with Triple H was a classic and it makes perfect sense to end his career with that match.

3: IT'S A HUGE WASTE OF TALENT. Come on. Brock Lesnar is better then this. He should have his Wrestlemania match be with another wrestler as incredibly talented as him. I said it once and I say it again, the only person who should ever face Lesnar at Wrestlemania if this was going to be Brock's only Wrestlemania, it should be Samoa Joe, but obviously that isn't going to happen. So at least have SOMEONE that is worthy of facing him. If this was Taker from like five or six years ago, I would be all for it.

Please, WWE, don't waste Lesnar like this, like you did at Extreme Rules.

Headliner

They already ruined that by having him lose to Cena.

Brock/Rock for the WWE title
Taker/Cena

Main-events for Mania.

XxIrvingxX

Okay that one really makes no sense. Neither of those two are actively on the show, I doubt they're going to at any point actually win the WWE title, and not to mention, we've seen it already!!

The main events should be

HHH/Lesnar
Austin/Punk
Bryan/Cena

Keep Taker out of the card. Let him retire already. He should not be facing another person. It makes no sense to have his record go from 20-0 to 21-0, the 1 just sticks out to much. Having him retire on a 20-0 record is perfect (no pun intended), and it just seems like a better kind of record image wise to go along with. 21-0...just, I don't know, something about it doesn't sit right with me. His HIAC match with Triple H was the perfect way to end his career and now the WWE is about to ruin it.

Ben

Triple H vs Undertaker 4

20-1

__________________
BBBL Portland Trailblazers GM

FSH

How about this Undertaker vs. Sheamus for the World Title(which ever one is on Smackdown) at WM

Undertaker gets 1 last World Title run he deserves and retires at Summerslam

Done and Done

__________________

Headliner

Rock said in a promo that he wants the WWE title. Which means he's going to get it. And there's no bigger money match than Rock/Brock. Both are bigger stars outside of WWE by far than anyone on the roster.

XxIrvingxX

You honestly think he's actually going to get a WWE title run? Lol. Please. Santino Marella winning the WWE title is more likely then the Rock winning the WWE title.

And yes, they're bigger stars outside the WWE then anyone else. I won't deny that. So why would you include the WWE championship into the match? Why would you have the WWE title be decided between two guys who were famous outside of the WWE? Vince would never do that, and for anyone it would be a incredibly stupid move. The match itself I guess wouldn't be a bad idea, but putting in the WWE championship would be stupid because neither person would be sticking after Wrestlemania, so it would be pointless.

Now here's something I just thought of. Why not have the Rock face the Undertaker at Wrestlemania?

I doubt the Undertaker would even stay healthy enough to make it to Over the Limit, much less Summerslam. The man wrestles about one match per year because his body can only take that much. There's no way he could have a world title reign for that long alone when you consider he would have to defend at every PPV, something he just can't do anymore.

And given the Undertaker's history at Wrestlemania and the importance of his undefeated streak, Wrestlemania will no doubt be the place where the Undertaker retires. I don't see it happening at any other event.

Basel

The only way Brock/Taker happens at WM29 is if WWE wants Cena/Taker at WM30.

__________________

Headliner

It would be a brilliant move for the credibility of the title and to help draw more money to the match. Mind you, there's a second World title so it's not like there's pressure for Rock to stay full time after winning the title. He can easily hold the title for a couple months before dropping it to whoever.

XxIrvingxX

I fail to see how it would help the "credibility" of the title when you have two INACTIVE wrestlers fighting for it, and not only that, it's a slap in the face to the rest of the locker room. You have all these guys that are wrestling week after week, are the ones constantly traveling, and yet the two people who are competing for the top prize are two people who got famous outside the WWE and rarely ever wrestle anymore in the WWE?? Bullshit! I don't care who the person is, I would never give one of the World titles to a person who wrestle's less then five times per year, and then just to add insult to injury, have ANOTHER person who wrestles less then five times a year wrestle for that title at the biggest event of the year. That's the kind of stupid shit TNA would do.