TNA Impact thread

[XxIrvingxX]

Originally Posted by Knick Killer

Huge biceps doesn't fix his ****ed up back. One bad bump and the Hulkster is in a wheelchair brother.

You see what you did there TNA?! YOU SEE WHAT YOU DID THERE?!?! YOU made Knick Killer RIGHT about something! YOU DID THAT!!!

TNA needs major improvements.

[Headliner]

TNA is better than WWE honestly. Has been for 4-6 months now. Especially in the last couple months.

[XxIrvingxX]

Originally Posted by Headliner

TNA is better than WWE honestly. Has been for 4-6 months now. Especially in the last couple months.

Rofl. No. Not even close. TNA stopped being better after around 2008 or 2009. They were and still are a piece of shit that still needs A LOT of improvement. Sure the wrestling has always been consistently better but there's still a lot of times where the wrestling can be not only boring but there's also little to no wrestling at all. On top of that there's so many horrible storylines, so many horrible feuds, and so many god awful booking decisions that it just brings down the quality of the show drastically. And not to mention, WWE's PPVs while showing the constant trend of ending on a bad note have had very solid shows through and through, along with some incredible match of the year candidates, where as TNA has been very inconsistent. Sometimes they put on the damn best PPV you'll ever see and then at times they just put on god awful PPV's. For once we aren't seeing that trend from the WWE this year.

TNA Impact is a joke, anything new TNA tries to do ends up being a joke, so far this Ace's storyline has been a joke. Monday Night Raw still sucks even with the extra hour, but no sane person would pick Impact over Raw. Raw's starting to have more consistently good matches thanks to the extra added hour, Smackdown's still a great show if you actually watch it, I can't say anything about NXT or Superstars even though they had great wrestling last time I watched them because I don't watch those shows at the moment. I don't want to rag down on TNA, I don't, before I would try to at least defend them for the things they do, but honestly, it's impossible to do so. They don't give you a reason to want to defend them anymore.

I know this is opinion based, but if you're a wrestling fan who likes good and interesting storylines, with good talent being used and not being overshadowed by people who don't belong in the main event scene, and with somewhat good booking decisions and good twists at times, there's no possible way you can say TNA is the better of the two, because they rarely ever do any of those things that I just mentioned, it's been like that for the past five or six years now. I'm sorry but it's the truth. No sane or unbiased person can deny that.

[Headliner]

TNA was terrible in 2008, 2009. You must like trainwreck TV.

There is nothing about the current WWE product that is better than TNA.
-The Aces and Eights storyline is great cliffhanger TV that engages the audience to watch the next show.
-The TNA womens division is ten times better than the WWE divas division.
-Bully Ray > Any heel in WWE.

I could go on. TNA has things to work on, but it boils down to momentum. TNA has a new energy about their shows since going live. WWE has had the same stale feeling in their show for years. Hopefully Punk and Heyman can shake things up, but considering they ruined the Summer of Punk last year, and ruined every single big storyline or hot thing in the last 4 years, I can't say my hopes is up.

[FSH]

Originally Posted by Headliner

TNA was terrible in 2008, 2009. You must like trainwreck TV.

There is nothing about the current WWE product that is better than TNA.
-The Aces and Eights storyline is great cliffhanger TV that engages the audience

Aces and Eights storyline is gonna turn out to be a huge pile of shit once the audience figures out the members are Luke Gallow,Chris Masters and Mike Knox

I mean really when the guys behind TNA "best storyline ever" are 3 rejects that couldnt crack the WWE midcard and cant even draw at Indys shows what does that say about your company? Seriously if any of them 3 takes the focus off of AJ,Daniels,Aries,Bully,Roodes that is f'n sad

[FSH]

Also could The Aces and Eights storyline be anymore like every other stables that has tried to take over a show? Seriously nWo,Nexus. Aces and Eights is the same thing just the guys are wearing mask. This is like WWE sent a bunch of their crap to TNA to laugh at them trying to turn these 3 rejects into Main Eventers.

TNA had something going from them when Aries won the World Title. Now they are gonna push 3 horrible guys into the Main Event. Only good thing that could come out of this is if the rumors are wrong and Aces and Eights arent some WWE rejects but Young Indy guys TNA can build from the ground up like they did Aries

[Headliner]

Joe is definitely involved. Roode could be too. They wouldn't do a major storyline only to reveal the main guys that the audience doesn't know. They might be revealed, but their will be bigger name stars with them.

[XxIrvingxX]

Originally Posted by Headliner

TNA was terrible in 2008, 2009. You must like trainwreck TV.

If that was the case then I would enjoy watching TNA.

Originally Posted by Headliner

There is nothing about the current WWE product that is better than TNA.

Punk as the world champion is better than Aries as world champion.

Originally Posted by Headliner

-The Aces and Eights storyline is great cliffhanger TV that engages the audience to watch the next show.

...no, it really isn't. Nothing about it is interesting, and the reason for it is that the stable is incredibly stupid.

Originally Posted by Headliner

-The TNA womens division is ten times better than the WWE divas division.

Who's division ISNT better than the Divas Division?

Originally Posted by Headliner

-Bully Ray > Any heel in WWE.

Can't tell if trolling or just biased.

Originally Posted by Headliner

I could go on. TNA has things to work on, but it boils down to momentum. TNA has a new energy about their shows since going live. WWE has had the same stale feeling in their show for years. Hopefully Punk and Heyman can shake things up, but considering they ruined the Summer of Punk last year, and ruined every single big storyline or hot thing in the last 4 years, I can't say my hopes is up.

And TNA hasn't? Main Event Mafia, the stupid storyline involving AJ and w/e chick he's with, Immortal, TNA couldn't have a successful storyline to save their life.

And WWE has had the same stale feeling?? John Cena hasn't been WWE champion all year, Bryan Danielson was the world champion and was in many world title matches on PPV through out this whole year, Rock vs Cena happening at Wrestlemania speaks for itself, same with Jericho vs Punk and Sheamus vs Bryan (keep in mind though that this doesn't include their wrestlemania match. **** that match), but I guess Hogan vs Sting at Bound For Glory is just as fresh and new right?

Speaking of stale, lets talk about TNA's main event scene shall we? Hmm Kurt Angle. Wow. That's...new? Jeff Hardy, oh good, can't wait for the next event that he shows up high to. Sting...yay? I guess bringing in Brook Hogan is new, so I'll give TNA credit with that (sarcasm). Oh hey a Aj Styles vs Daniels storyline. I wonder how many times that happened? Bobby Roode and Austin Aries is great, too bad Hogan and Sting need more airtime so the focus is never on them.

Does the WWE have it's weaknesses? Absolutely. The tag team division while it is improving still blows, they are continuously putting non title matches as the main event matches on PPV, including...ugh I'm not even going to repeat the main event from Over the Limit. Some of the booking is still stupid and Big Show being involved with the main event just automatically ruins it. But unlike TNA, WWE actually has some positive things going on and when they are consistent, they are consistent in a good way, where TNA for god knows how long has just been consistent in the most shittiest possible way.

It isn't even arguable. TNA is not better than the WWE.

[BlueBaron]

Originally Posted by XxIrvingxX

If that was the case then I would enjoy watching TNA.



Punk as the world champion is better than Aries as world champion.



...no, it really isn't. Nothing about it is interesting, and the reason for it is that the stable is incredibly stupid.



Who's division ISNT better than the Divas Division?



Can't tell if trolling or just biased.



And TNA hasn't? Main Event Mafia, the stupid storyline involving AJ and w/e chick he's with, Immortal, TNA couldn't have a successful storyline to save their life.

And WWE has had the same stale feeling?? John Cena hasn't been WWE champion all year, Bryan Danielson was the world champion and was in many world title matches on PPV through out this whole year, Rock vs Cena happening at Wrestlemania speaks for itself, same with Jericho vs Punk and Sheamus vs Bryan (keep in mind though that this doesn't include their wrestlemania match. **** that match), but I guess Hogan vs Sting at Bound For Glory is just as fresh and new right?

Speaking of stale, lets talk about TNA's main event scene shall we? Hmm Kurt Angle. Wow. That's...new? Jeff Hardy, oh good, can't wait for the next event that he shows up high to. Sting...yay? I guess bringing in Brook Hogan is new, so I'll give TNA credit with that (sarcasm). Oh hey a Aj Styles vs Daniels storyline. I wonder how many times that happened? Bobby Roode and Austin Aries is great, too bad Hogan and Sting need more airtime so the focus is never on them.

Does the WWE have it's weaknesses? Absolutely. The tag team division while it is improving still blows, they are continuously putting non title matches as the main event matches on PPV, including...ugh I'm not even going to repeat the main event from Over the Limit. Some of the booking is still stupid and Big Show being involved with the main event just automatically ruins it. But unlike TNA, WWE actually has some positive things going on and when they are consistent, they are consistent in a good way, where TNA for god knows how long has just been consistent in the most shittiest possible way.

It isn't even arguable. TNA is not better than the WWE.

I think TNA is better too. It's obviously clear. You're entitled to your opinion no matter how wrong it is.

[TheAnswer]

Whether TNA is better than WWE is irrelevant. I don't see anyone changing their stance, it pretty much comes down to preference.

There's somethings TNA has over WWE and vice versa. If you want an edgier product then TNA is the way to go, it appeals to the older ages as opposed to WWE which is currently in its PG era. If you want known wrestlers it's WWE. Then there's other stuff like TNA focusing on different areas (Cruiserweights, Tag Team, Divas, the TV title for a while) as elsewhere in WWE they focus on the uppercard and the big guns only. There's a lot more preference based things, but yeah it just comes down to what is preferred or not preferred.

[XxIrvingxX]

Originally Posted by BlueBaron

I think TNA is better too. It's obviously clear. You're entitled to your opinion no matter how wrong it is.

Nice valid reasoning, something TNA fans horribly lack.

[XxIrvingxX]

Originally Posted by TheAnswer

Whether TNA is better than WWE is irrelevant. I don't see anyone changing their stance, it pretty much comes down to preference.

There's somethings TNA has over WWE and vice versa. If you want an edgier product then TNA is the way to go, it appeals to the older ages as opposed to WWE which is currently in its PG era. If you want known wrestlers it's WWE. Then there's other stuff like TNA focusing on different areas (Cruiserweights, Tag Team, Divas, the TV title for a while) as elsewhere in WWE they focus on the uppercard and the big guns only. There's a lot more preference based things, but yeah it just comes down to what is preferred or not preferred.

So basically if you like TNA then you prefer crappy storylines, booking, main events and many disappointments? I can understand that...

[TheAnswer]

Well I prefer WWE over TNA myself, but both organizations have their pros and cons. It comes down to each company's Pros vs Pros and that's where some people take TNA over WWE.

[BlueBaron]

If you don't think Bully Ray is better than any heel in the WWE then you're crazy. Don't get me wrong, I like WWE just fine but it's the same old shit all the time. If it wasn't for Daniel Bryan, CM Punk, or Randy Orton I probably wouldn't make it a point to watch WWE.

[Ben]

Originally Posted by XxIrvingxX

So basically if you like TNA then you prefer crappy storylines, booking, main events and many disappointments? I can understand that...

You say that as if WWE is any different.