FSH

Unless they plan on turning Punk back to a babyface by Undertaker and him shaking hands at the end of the match. Or they plan on turning him into the full blown mega heel by ending the Undertaker Streak. I dont see this working

I think you do Sheamus vs. Undertaker at WM. If WWE wants Sheamus to reach face of the company status you have him put on a incredible match with Taker on the biggest stage. Sheamus last WM match was a joke and hurt him since the 30 seconds win against Daniel Bryan backfired really badly

__________________

Headliner

If it's not Brock, I don't want to see it. Sadly they will probably do Brock/HHH so HHH can get his win back.

XxIrvingxX

What if they had the Rock be Undertakers opponent?

__________________

Knick Killer

Of course they will. Triple H has too big of an ego to not get a win back. He's such a piece of shit.

No thanks. I'd rather see Undertaker face Lesnar, CM Punk, Cena, or Sheamus.

__________________

roux2dope

I predicted it would be Brock Lesnar months ago and i still feel like that would be the best direction to go in. Punk while he is great is not the brawler type guy that i think the fans could buy laying a wrestlemania beatdown on Taker(only to eventually lose) Brock is the one guy left that can make the fans feel the undertaker is invincible.

XxIrvingxX

I don't see how anyone can say that with a serious look on their face

__________________

Seanzie

The reason to put Sheamus in that match is to establish him as one of those extremely over guys you can build your show around. It would also provide the opportunity for him to be a heel, which he's much better at.

Punk, Lesnar and Cena seem the most likely opponents and could all be interesting with the right build-up. I wouldn't want to see Rock in that match.

I wish they'd use it to build a new star, but the match has become a marketing tool at this point, so it's not going to be someone who isn't already a big name.

__________________
Nope.

XxIrvingxX

Yea but the whole idea is that you want Undertaker to be facing bigger named opponents if it's a marketing tool. The Rock would be the best possible person for that, it's certainly better than trying to have him be in the title picture.

__________________

AllRim

Who the fack cares it's wrestling

__________________
FRSL Toronto Raptors - Home Court Igloo advantage

KVBL Grizzlies - The team that traded Duke and all their picks, to get nothing in return. Gary level achieved.

Knick Killer

We've seen the Rock vs. the Undertaker a ****ing million times why would you want to see it again at Wrestlemania? Either build a new star or have him face someone who doesn't have much history with him.

If you don't care then get the **** outta here.

__________________

XxIrvingxX

We've seen Brock Lesnar vs Taker a lot of times as well, hell we even saw them face each other in a hell in a cell match. And it garners the most interest. The best way to do Taker's matches at Mania is to have a face face him (sadly that was the best way I could think of wording it).

Although I do think that Cena is the only person Taker should be facing at Wrestlemania. But if I had to choose between Rock and Lesnar I would pick Rock in a heartbeat. Also there's so many better opponents you could have for a great talent like Lesnar. For someone like him, you don't want to waste this appearance. Give him someone great. Don't waste it on a broken down Taker, I don't care how much attention it draws.

__________________

Gonzo

Lesnar and HHH will happen at WM 29 so it won't be Lesnar.

__________________

Cinco de Mayo

At this point, it doesn't really matter to me because I have no confidence Undertaker would be booked to lose, nor should he. It's not like his legend is going to get any greater at this point, and if someone like Sheamus were booked to give him his one loss, people would forget about it by July and it'll look hugely stupid in the long run when Sheamus is wrestling mid-card matches on some forgettable PPV.

Ultimately, it'll be a pretty good match with a ton of near-falls before the Tombstone finishes.

I wouldn't be disappointed if there were more UT WrestleMania matches, but the last one seemed like a really good stopping point in storyline terms.

__________________
JOHNJOHNJOHNJOHN
JOHNJOHNJOHNJOHN
JOHNJOHNJOHNJOHN
JOHNJOHN
JOHNJOHN
JOHNJOHNJOHNJOHN
JOHNJOHNJOHNJOHN
JOHNJOHNJOHNJOHN
JOHNJOHN
JOHNJOHN
JOHNJOHN
JOHNJOHN
JOHNJOHN
JOHNJOHN
JOHNJOHN

XxIrvingxX

Agreed, that should've been the ending point. 20-0, end of an era, yet for some strange reason they are going to continue it. I just don't understand it. 20-0 is absolutely perfect. Just leave it at that ffs.

__________________

Gonzo

They are continuing it because Vince can make money from it. Pretty simple idea.

__________________