Ray Clay - Page 3 - Basketball Forum : Professional and College Basketball Forums
BasketballForum.com is the premier basketball Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
User Tag List

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-03-2002, 12:32 PM   #31 (permalink)
 

Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 394
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally posted by KC
It was only a matter of time......
You said a mouthful, KC.
BullsNews is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 07-03-2002, 12:40 PM   #32 (permalink)
BCH
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 

Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Fairfax, VA
Posts: 6,118
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally posted by Lizzy
I guess my standpoint is this:

If Krause did decide to have Clay fired b/c he said publicly that he wanted to announce MJ like he used to, who cares? If I worked for the Bulls I would know that there are some things you don't take to the media. It's common knowledge that Krause and Jordan have a bad relationship. Krause is your current employer. Jordan is no longer a part of the company. And as harsh and short-sided as this sounds, I would have felt kind of crappy being a member of the Bulls and hearing MY pa announcer give the other team the home team treatment. These guys know what's up and know who the fans were there to see but at the same time - you're already living in his huge *** shadow. You're already playing in Mike's house with his banners and statue and "sacred" locker. Krause is trying to give these new guys a sense of idenity and make them seem like the stars. If I were the Bulls PA announcer I would not do anything to jeapordize that sweet job. Clay knows Krause. He knows what will piss him off. Maybe he didn't think he'd lose his job for stating an opinion but I guess he learned the hard way.

If that's what the reason was.
You make a point. And I am on record as saying that I don't personally care that Clay was fired, and the reasons you give for why he was fired are probably accurate. he probably even knew the situation he was in and that his comments put him out there as a target. Taking all of it into account, it still does not make sense to fire the guy for his comments. My point is that if it has reached the point where this type of behavious is expected from the Bulls organization, it can't be good.
BCH is offline  
Old 07-03-2002, 12:43 PM   #33 (permalink)
Administrator
Photobucket
 
truebluefan's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2002
Location: Twilight Zone
Posts: 58,361
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally posted by BCH


Truebluefan,

My argument is based on more fact than any other. Krause runs the organization. That is without a doubt. If blame is going to fall, it is going to fall on him. I am at least giving him enough credit to put him in a position to be in control of something like this. It is hilious to think a joe schmoe PR guy does this without fully realizing the ramifications and advising Krause of it first.

As for the reason, again I have most of the facts on my side. There is no doubt that Clay said how he wanted to announce MJ and how he was told no. This was made public. His firing was addressed witht he statement the Bulls wanted to go in a new direction. We can only go with what we have seen.

I am depending upon insinuation the least out of anyone even debating this.
But BCH, you are still missing the fact that i want proof. Clear and simple. Connecting the dots is not always the clear picture. Both sides here, can talk all they want and get no where. What i want is:

Clear proof that supports your arguement not opinion. Truth is no one knows exactly how the bulls organization is ran. Not really. I will give you this, you make an arguement, but thats all it is is arguement. I challenged all on this board to present proof to support their side. Articles preferred. Both sides. Now is that being unreasonable?

If we don't get clear proof for either/or, then we will always argue and get no where. Over and over and over....
truebluefan is offline  
Old 07-03-2002, 12:50 PM   #34 (permalink)
BCH
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 

Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Fairfax, VA
Posts: 6,118
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
truebluefan,

There was one press release stating the Bulls want to go in a new direction. That is it.

You want concrete proof from me? I have presented a very easy to follow argument as to why Krause would know and why he is to blame. No one has even presented anything close to a reason why they believe what they believe. I know you recognize this, but to get a straight answer about it from the Bulls is not going to happen. Marriotti clearly echoed what I said, but his column is no longer there.

Like I said, I know this is going to be a circular argument, and that it is pretty much over. Nothing new is being said, but I answered the original posters question with the fact that it was speculation and intimation on why he was fired.

I am all for moving on to the next topic rather than beating this twice dead horse again. But as has happened in the past, if I fail to address each and every point made, I am accused of ducking the issue. Lets all just let it go.
BCH is offline  
Old 07-03-2002, 12:52 PM   #35 (permalink)
 

Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 3,175
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally posted by BCH


You make a point. And I am on record as saying that I don't personally care that Clay was fired, and the reasons you give for why he was fired are probably accurate. he probably even knew the situation he was in and that his comments put him out there as a target. Taking all of it into account, it still does not make sense to fire the guy for his comments. My point is that if it has reached the point where this type of behavious is expected from the Bulls organization, it can't be good.
Well - from what I understand the Bulls orginization doesn't look good to outsiders whether it's warranted or not. I think Krause could buy everyone on the staff a brand new car and the BUlls would still seem like a bad place to be. Not until we start winning consistently will people even care about what Chicago is doing.

Look at it this way. Probably every basketball fan out side of Chicago hates Krause. They think he broke up the dynasty single-handedly and so they hate him. Probably half of the BUlls fans hate Krause for the same reason. That leaves a very tiny portion of people who actually like Krause. The firing of Ray Clay isn't going to make or break what people think of the Bulls. They already have set opinions and not much is going to change that. The bottom line is there are far worse GM's and far worse orginizations to play for. It's all about perception and the current perception of Chicago is bad. Period. (for all of their major sports for that matter. Chicago sports have the worst owners. The Bulls are the newest and most successful franchise in the city)
Lizzy is offline  
Old 07-03-2002, 12:57 PM   #36 (permalink)
GB
Legend
 

Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 10,837
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally posted by BCH
truebluefan,

There was one press release stating the Bulls want to go in a new direction. That is it.

You want concrete proof from me? I have presented a very easy to follow argument as to why Krause would know and why he is to blame. No one has even presented anything close to a reason why they believe what they believe. I know you recognize this, but to get a straight answer about it from the Bulls is not going to happen. Marriotti clearly echoed what I said, but his column is no longer there.

Like I said, I know this is going to be a circular argument, and that it is pretty much over. Nothing new is being said, but I answered the original posters question with the fact that it was speculation and intimation on why he was fired.

I am all for moving on to the next topic rather than beating this twice dead horse again. But as has happened in the past, if I fail to address each and every point made, I am accused of ducking the issue. Lets all just let it go.
More meaningless drivel. Then he runs.

Krauses title is VP of BASKETBALL Operations.

Yes, he is the 'face' of the organization because he puts the product on the floor. But's a multitiered organization.

http://www.nba.com/bulls/news/staff_directory.html

I'm sure he's not interested in facts though. They don't allow him to arrest threads like he has this one.

Shame on you TrueBlue.
GB is offline  
Old 07-03-2002, 01:06 PM   #37 (permalink)
Administrator
Photobucket
 
truebluefan's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2002
Location: Twilight Zone
Posts: 58,361
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Ty for your link. No he didnt arrest this thread. I pushed it as much or more than he did. I am just so tired of hearing that JK is guilty of everything! With no real hard proof. If he can come up with proof to support his claim then i will accept it! If however real proof proves otherwise, that JK was not to blame for Ray being fired, then every time JK gets blames for this i can squash it. It doesn't matter if he is intersted in the facts are not. True hard facts speak louder than hearsay.

By the way i got a couple of e-mails out and hope to get an answer on this by the weekends end.
truebluefan is offline  
Old 07-03-2002, 01:07 PM   #38 (permalink)
I never slice.
 
Kneepad's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,282
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally posted by BCH
My argument is based on more fact than any other. Krause runs the organization. That is without a doubt. If blame is going to fall, it is going to fall on him. I am at least giving him enough credit to put him in a position to be in control of something like this. It is hilious to think a joe schmoe PR guy does this without fully realizing the ramifications and advising Krause of it first.
I believe you are wrong about that, BCH. Krause's title is "Executive Vice President - Basketball Operations". Steve Shanwald's title is "Executive Vice President - Business Operations". Included in his job description is overseeing "areas that include Ticket Sales, Advertising Sales, Game Entertainment, Promotions, Media Services, Community Relations, Publications, Advertising and Broadcasting". Sounds to me like Schanwald does NOT report to Krause, but rather directly to Reinsdorf.
Kneepad is offline  
Old 07-03-2002, 01:14 PM   #39 (permalink)
 

Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 3,175
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
That's true. In most companies 1 executive vice-president would not report to another. A VP can report to an EVP but that's about it. EVP's report to CEO's.

I'm babbling.

That's a good point Kneepad.
Lizzy is offline  
Old 07-03-2002, 01:34 PM   #40 (permalink)
BCH
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 

Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Fairfax, VA
Posts: 6,118
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
And Wes Unseld is the Wizards GM, making the call on all roster moves.

Titles are meaningless, and if you want to look to the corporate world you will easily see this. It is all about who has the clout.
BCH is offline  
Old 07-03-2002, 01:35 PM   #41 (permalink)
Administrator
Photobucket
 
truebluefan's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2002
Location: Twilight Zone
Posts: 58,361
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
I might lock this thread soon. I might be leaving for the weekend either tonight or tomorrow. Should i leave, i will lock this thread and unlock it sunday . Hopefully by then i might have some evidence to back up either side of the arguement. Other wise i dont want this to be argued over when i am gone with no moderator here. Any evidence either for or against can be saved until sunday should i lock the thread.
truebluefan is offline  
Old 07-03-2002, 01:37 PM   #42 (permalink)
GB
Legend
 

Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 10,837
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally posted by BCH
And Wes Unseld is the Wizards GM, making the call on all roster moves.

Titles are meaningless, and if you want to look to the corporate world you will easily see this. It is all about who has the clout.
Someone with clout should wipe your infestation from this board.


No we cannot do that. Difference of opinion is not reason to ban someone.

Last edited by truebluefan; 07-03-2002 at 02:06 PM.
GB is offline  
Old 07-03-2002, 01:40 PM   #43 (permalink)
I never slice.
 
Kneepad's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,282
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally posted by truebluefan
I might lock this thread soon.
I for one am outta here. I have better luck trying to reason with my 3-year old daughter.
Kneepad is offline  
Old 07-03-2002, 01:43 PM   #44 (permalink)
BCH
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 

Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Fairfax, VA
Posts: 6,118
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally posted by gettinbranded


Someone with clout should wipe your infestation from this board.
Because I made an obvious observation directly refuting your point? I am confused why you can't handle that. I suggest you lock it down TBF if this is what the comments are going to boil down to.
BCH is offline  
Old 07-03-2002, 01:45 PM   #45 (permalink)
GB
Legend
 

Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 10,837
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally posted by BCH


Because I made an obvious observation directly refuting your point? I am confused why you can't handle that. I suggest you lock it down TBF if this is what the comments are going to boil down to.
No, because despite the facts to the contrary, you persist in a course that makes as much sense as drafting a guard in the first round that would have been there in the second.
GB is offline  
Closed Thread


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:16 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.1.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 2002 2013 BasketballBoards.net.