Spurs were not even in the finals his rookie year! It was Duncan's second season that the Spurs made it to the championship game and he won FInals MVP.Originally posted by <b>RebelSun</b>!
Duncan was the Finals MVP in his rookie year. No doubt, TD.
My bad, I'm always thinking it was his first. Regardless, I'll still take TD.Originally posted by <b>rynobot</b>!
Spurs were not even in the finals his rookie year! It was Duncan's second season that the Spurs made it to the championship game and he won FInals MVP.
Case Closed? Alright, first of all it's hard to pick between the two. Duncan didn't win that finals all by himself. He had the Admiral and a solid supporting cast. T-Mac is a huge gamer. No rings doesn't mean anything. If it did it would also mean Trent Dilfer is better than Dan Marino, is that true No. Trent has one more ring than Marino's Zero, and we all know who is better. Do you see my point? I'd Take T-Mac #1 Because imagine if he'd played more early in his career. His new explosion all came of his 3 year stint with orlando. I'd take him #1 start him then and develope him.Originally posted by <b>bruno34115</b>!
how in the world can you say that? two rings> zero rings