Professional and College Basketball Forums banner

ABC discussion: Should MVP be in the first team?

794 Views 16 Replies 12 Participants Last post by  Ras
If Billups or Nash wins the MVP award, perhaps we are not going to see MVP in the ALL NBA first team.

Someone asked Bill Walton in ABC TV: " Has this ever happened in the NBA history?"

..........
  • Like
Reactions: 1
1 - 17 of 17 Posts
bill russell won mvp but wasn't in first team, it was because everyone agreed no one was more valuable to their team but in terms of skillset there were other centers accomplishing more than him

EDIT: i didn't realise u made genuine posts
yes it is...
He should be.

If the MVP goes to the 2nd or even 3rd team, this only shows that there is someone who is better than him at his same position, which doesn't make sense since you're the 'most valuable player'.
they've approached mvp and all-nba voting differently. for whatever reason.

cowens was also mvp and 2nd team (to kareem), i believe.
And at least one of the years Moses Malone won MVP, Kareem was first team All-NBA center.
If Billups wins it would be a joke. Seriously, Pistons have 5 all stars in that lineup

as for this question, I think it should involve Steve Nash. He has a good chance at mvp yet Kobe and Wade are having better statistical seasons then he is.
wadeshaqeddie said:
If Billups wins it would be a joke. Seriously, Pistons have 5 all stars in that lineup

as for this question, I think it should involve Steve Nash. He has a good chance at mvp yet Kobe and Wade are having better statistical seasons then he is.
4 but that isnt the point(except me for being a smarta**) Some of the Statistics that dont show up are man v man defence in which Billups and Kobe are the best of the 4 you mentioned, and dont any1 say well dwade gets 2 steals and 2 blocks because that isnt all of defence. That is kind of like saying Allen Iverson is good at defence because he steals so well...
If MVP were in the 2nd team, that means MVP value < top 5 players.
SHEED! said:
4 but that isnt the point(except me for being a smarta**) Some of the Statistics that dont show up are man v man defence in which Billups and Kobe are the best of the 4 you mentioned, and dont any1 say well dwade gets 2 steals and 2 blocks because that isnt all of defence. That is kind of like saying Allen Iverson is good at defence because he steals so well...
Prince is close to an all star. I didnt mean it in the sense of all being selected to the team, but the sense that the team has 5 key players who each contribute around the same to the team. They are a traditional team in the sense that they all do the things needed. Now Billups might make the big shots and run the show, but that doesnt make him mvp of the league, when its questionable if he is more important than his 4 teammates, and others are putting up way superior stats in comparison. Great player, dont get me wrong, but not mvp quality.

as for the defense, Wade is a good defender. Not as good man to man as the two, which I agree with you about, but he has the best help defense of the 3 (and dont say help d isnt important- Ben won dpoy's by being the best at that int he league) and alltogether on d I would rank Kobe first with the other 2 right behind at the same level. They are both solid at it.


as for offense, 19,9, and 3 on 41% compared to 27, 7, and 6 on 50%. Dont see much comparison there, except that Billups is on the better team, which definately helps, but Wade is leading a top 5 team himself
See less See more
MVP isn't the best player, it's the most valuable player. If it were simply the best player than Mike would have won even more MVPs because there was never a question as to who was the best player in the league, but there were seasons where others appeared to be more important to their team's success.

I'm pretty sure when Wes Unseld won MVP as a rookie he was not 1st team All-NBA, his numbers weren't that great.

As for this year, if Nash gets MVP again would it surprise people to see Wade and Kobe on 1st team? Could Billups be the runner up and be All-NBA 3rd team behind those 2 Nash and AI? I don't think there could much argument over that scenario. Nash and Billups have been the MVP front runners all year while Kobe, Wade and AI have had monster statistical years.
wadeshaqeddie, if you're going to talk about Kobe and Wade having monster statistical seasons, how can you forget LeBron?

LBJ - 31.5 ppg/7.3 rpg/6.7 apg/1.56 spg/0.89 bpg/3.27 tpg/47.8 FG%/33.7 3P%
KB8 - 34.8 ppg/5.3 rpg/4.6 apg/1.78 spg/0.41 bpg/3.22 tpg/44.6 FG%/34.1 3P%
Flash - 27.9 ppg/5.8 rpg/6.7 apg/1.88 spg/0.8 bpg/3.45 tpg/49.6 FG%/17.6 3P%
wadeshaqeddie said:
Prince is close to an all star. I didnt mean it in the sense of all being selected to the team, but the sense that the team has 5 key players who each contribute around the same to the team. They are a traditional team in the sense that they all do the things needed. Now Billups might make the big shots and run the show, but that doesnt make him mvp of the league, when its questionable if he is more important than his 4 teammates, and others are putting up way superior stats in comparison. Great player, dont get me wrong, but not mvp quality.

as for the defense, Wade is a good defender. Not as good man to man as the two, which I agree with you about, but he has the best help defense of the 3 (and dont say help d isnt important- Ben won dpoy's by being the best at that int he league) and alltogether on d I would rank Kobe first with the other 2 right behind at the same level. They are both solid at it.


as for offense, 19,9, and 3 on 41% compared to 27, 7, and 6 on 50%. Dont see much comparison there, except that Billups is on the better team, which definately helps, but Wade is leading a top 5 team himself
The percentages there are really misleading imo because Billups game is all bout his great three point precentage and Wades is Slashing to the hole. Whats going to get a better percentage shooting a 20 foot something jumper or a layup and when you say weak side defence is defence but just cause someone can steal doesnt make them a good defender sure I agree weakside is defending but of all the times you miss a steal or block means the player has a great chance of blowing right by them. My Final Point is you cannot comparing scoring between a point gaurd and a combo 2 gaurd because one is supposed to set up and orchastrate the offence and the 2 gaurd is primarly supposed to score. While Billups may not be a traditional "star" which makes him unique imo. By his efficentcy at the point I dont know why you cant have him as a candidate
Ras said:
wadeshaqeddie, if you're going to talk about Kobe and Wade having monster statistical seasons, how can you forget LeBron?

LBJ - 31.5 ppg/7.3 rpg/6.7 apg/1.56 spg/0.89 bpg/3.27 tpg/47.8 FG%/33.7 3P%
KB8 - 34.8 ppg/5.3 rpg/4.6 apg/1.78 spg/0.41 bpg/3.22 tpg/44.6 FG%/34.1 3P%
Flash - 27.9 ppg/5.8 rpg/6.7 apg/1.88 spg/0.8 bpg/3.45 tpg/49.6 FG%/17.6 3P%
because he is a foward, and we are talking about making the all nba first team as guard

he is definately making it as foward, and has imo the best chance at mvp. But my arguement was with Billups, Wade, and I mentioned Nash as a possibility originally asked in this question. Foward wasnt being discussed, or Lebron definately woud of been mentioned
It has happened before so I dont see the problem.
I don't think they'll put two shooting guards on the first team.

But who knows. The NBA likes screwing the point guard position.
wadeshaqeddie said:
because he is a foward, and we are talking about making the all nba first team as guard

he is definately making it as foward, and has imo the best chance at mvp. But my arguement was with Billups, Wade, and I mentioned Nash as a possibility originally asked in this question. Foward wasnt being discussed, or Lebron definately woud of been mentioned
My mistake then.
1 - 17 of 17 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top