I don't understand why Krause would pull the trigger to get a guy he got rid of less then a year ago...?Originally posted by <b>FJ_of _Rockaway</b>!
EStrick, Hassell and Artest certainly puts some steel in our perimeter D behind Jay, Jalen and ERob + EStrick can hit the 3 ( about a 30% clip ) He would make an ideal back up to Jay
Jamal for Ron - that's the centrepiece
Yes or No ?
Honestly, I think that if we traded Fizer at this point, we'd be fine. Maybe we can pass him off for the Knick's trade exception. That gives us more FA power next year and I don't think it'd hurt us much up front.Originally posted by <b>basghetti80</b>!
i agree it is a decent idea but wouldnt work logjam would actually be worse:
This is only way it works but means Marshall would only play PF and either fizer or chandler would be just out of luck when it comes to minutes-i like the idea of ron coming back though but this way wont do it
Artest had to be included to make it work $ wiseOriginally posted by <b>Jim Ian</b>!
I don't understand why Krause would pull the trigger to get a guy he got rid of less then a year ago...?
And wouldn't that create just a god-awful logjam at the 3?
Because they have Al Harrington - they have to accommodate Bender and they have the emerging Freddie Jones and they are tied up with $7m owed to Ron Mercer who they used as the big guard defender on JKidd in last season's playoffs + and they may want to move Jamal TinsleyOriginally posted by <b>sinkingship</b>!
Indiana sees Artest as a rare defensive player. Why would they trade him for Crawford?
Indy is set in the back court.