Not trying to be a douche here, truly, but words do have meaning.As to the point "above average big men" in this league, that in and of itself is a pretty relative brush to paint players with.
My point (and Adam's) is there aren't many big men in this league, or all of the NCAA for that matter anymore, that can take over a game in the paint and will their team to win.
Adam never stated that "there aren't many big men in this league that can take over a game in the paint and will their team to win."
Had he said that, I don't think anyone would've argued the point.
What he said was, and I quote, "If there's one thing I'm sure of, it's that the A10 is not a league of great big men. There's like 4 of them I would consider better than average."
I already went through and picked out 10 guys who I think are "better than average" either offensively, defensively or both.
Instead of moving the goalposts, why not tell me specifically where I'm wrong?