[Sambonius]

Portland trades: C Vladimir Stepania (2.8 ppg, 3.0 rpg, 0.6 apg in 10.9 minutes)
SF Qyntel Woods (4.5 ppg, 3.1 rpg, 1.0 apg in 13.6 minutes)
SF Rasheed Wallace (17.1 ppg, 6.8 rpg, 2.7 apg in 38.1 minutes)
Portland receives: SG Jamal Crawford (16.9 ppg, 3.3 rpg, 5.5 apg in 34.8 minutes)
PF Tyson Chandler (13.0 ppg, 10.3 rpg, 1.0 apg in 28.6 minutes)
PF Antonio Davis (9.3 ppg, 9.4 rpg, 1.7 apg in 33.0 minutes)
Change in team outlook: +14.8 ppg, +10.1 rpg, and +3.9 apg.

Chicago trades: SG Jamal Crawford (16.9 ppg, 3.3 rpg, 5.5 apg in 34.8 minutes)
PF Tyson Chandler (13.0 ppg, 10.3 rpg, 1.0 apg in 28.6 minutes)
PF Antonio Davis (9.3 ppg, 9.4 rpg, 1.7 apg in 33.0 minutes)
Chicago receives: C Vladimir Stepania (2.8 ppg, 3.0 rpg, 0.6 apg in 37 games)
SF Qyntel Woods (4.5 ppg, 3.1 rpg, 1.0 apg in 37 games)
SF Rasheed Wallace (17.1 ppg, 6.8 rpg, 2.7 apg in 38 games)
Change in team outlook: -14.8 ppg, -10.1 rpg, and -3.9 apg.

TRADE ACCEPTED

 

[Johnny Mac]

Nah.

Chandler and Crawford will probably both be better than Woods. Wallace probably wont resign with us, and hes not the best player for the situation we are in. Plus the cap space wont do much good since we are at rock bottom, and no one would sign here.

Plus we're giving up AD who is a solid player. This deal rips the Bulls off badly.

 

[TripleDouble]

the Bulls have tried cap room before. It didn't work. I can't see them wanting Rasheed long term.

 

[Sambonius]

Why wouldn't Sheed resign? Yall would have the bird rights on him, its quite easy to resign him, just match every offer he receives or resign him for 7 or 8 mil. Qyntel has a lotta potential, just as much as Jamal, if not more. Jamal has also had more opportunities to succeed unlike Qyn but Jamal hasn't always delivered.

 

[arenas809]

No.

 

[Sambonius]

At just about the same age, Wallace was a more polished offensive player than Chandler. Also at the same age, Wallace was a much better defender than Curry. You can't honestly say that Curry and Chandler has more potential than Wallace when Wallace was at the same age. If both Curry and Chandler are as sure to be great player as LeBron James is to become, then I agree that it would be unrealistic to trade Wallace for one of them.

 

[Johnny Mac]

Originally posted by <b>Sambonius</b>!
At just about the same age, Wallace was a more polished offensive player than Chandler. Also at the same age, Wallace was a much better defender than Curry. You can't honestly say that Curry and Chandler has more potential than Wallace when Wallace was at the same age. If both Curry and Chandler are as sure to be great player as LeBron James is to become, then I agree that it would be unrealistic to trade Wallace for one of them.

Wallace is getting old though. Plus hes a headcase and a half. I think he has more skills than Curry and Chandler will ever have (maybe combined) but he is quickly leaving his prime and is known as a headcase. Thats not a player you trade for, especially giving up two young prospects and another solid veteran.

 

[Sambonius]

Rasheed still has more than 5 years left and Qyntel is a young player. While I think Davis is a solid veteran, you guys should be thanking any team who takes his contract off your heads.