Blazers are deeper but Clippers are younger, too many really bad player son the Clippers (Dooling, Piatkowski, Stith, Rooks, Fowlkes) and unprooven players (Wilcox, Ely, Jaric) to give them the edge over Portland.
Too bad none of the players you list for the Clips are horrible.
Dooling is not horrible. The jury is still out on how good he can become, but he is a quality backup
Eric Piatkowski is also far from horrible. Pike, like Dooling, is a quality backup. He's not starter material, but he has his role, and he is excellent at it.
Yet another. Sean Rooks is not horrible. He is an excellent backup C.
And Tremaine Fowlkes really doesnt matter ... He's going to be on IR. And for being an IR player, he too is a good player.
You seem to rate players on a scale of if they are worth starters. Thats not how you do it. Certain guys are very good backups, and thats what Dooling, Pike, and Rooks are. They are FAR from horrible. Thats a ridiculous claim.
One little thing, even though it really doesnt matter. Andre Miller isn't just a real good player. He's a great player.
Oh, yeah, about your overrated comments. Those are absolutely laughable. You mention guys like Maggette and Dooling(and they are FAR from overrated) as overrated, then you call guys like Stoudamire, McInnis, Anderson and Kemp as good or decent, when each is overrated.
Your opinion is clearly biased, and serves no purpose to this discussion.
The Clippers are younger, deeper, and most importantly, better than the Blazers.
