Joined
·
1,164 Posts
I could come up with an essay about this guy, but I'll get straight to the point. WHY DOES HE PLAY??????????????????????
b/c Frank thinks hid D is good against bigs, and he can shoot the 3.we really dont hav a better backup right now other than mjax and cliffy.NJ Grand NJ said:I could come up with an essay about this guy, but I'll get straight to the point. WHY DOES HE PLAY??????????????????????
Because the NETS brass invested $2.5mil per in this guy rather than re-upping Veal - younger player with more upside. There went the winning chemistry.NJ Grand NJ said:I could come up with an essay about this guy, but I'll get straight to the point. WHY DOES HE PLAY??????????????????????
I literally laughed out loud at this post. SCALABRINE??? Have you looked at what he is doing...or should I say, NOT doing...with the Celtics. He is averaging 1.9 ppg and 1.1 rpg. He has yet to hit a three and is barely shooting 40% from the floor. The Celtics COMMITTED $15 million to him. HE STINKS. He is a JOKE. No GM other than Ainge, who liked his "brain type", would have given him $15 million. Cliffy: $2.2 million [not $2.5 million] with a team option for $2.3 million next seasonNBASCOUT2005 said:Because the NETS brass invested $2.5mil per in this guy rather than re-upping Veal - younger player with more upside. There went the winning chemistry. Cliffy is a nice Robert Parish at 40 spot player, but his age makes him a liability. Frank plays him because he earns more than Padgett and Frank doesn't want to upset the playing minutes relative to salary political pecking order - yet! Notice how Padgett has two great games and then is sat down in favor of Robinson? Heck, he'd better play the young fresh legs. It's a young man's game and that's what brings the hustle and intensity to win. Also, Frank, like Larry Brown, has to emphasize that the NETS will play continuous tough D for 48mins. The aging players on the decline pulling down big bucks can't be worried about big-buck player scoring average & stats & other such niceties. They have to start playing winning b-ball and let the numbers fall where they may. This bunch won't blow anyone out on the offensive end unless they get VC back and start playing D. The defense must key the offense. Also, they'd better learn to play inside out and encourage Krstic to dominate in the post. Few can stop him offensively and involving him that way is better than watching Kidd warm up his own shooting act early in the season. Hope Kidd finishes like Giambi. In the meantime, they've got to tell Krstic that the NETS season rests on his shoulders and ask him to score more, dominate in the post and down low in the paint. They've got to tell Krstic to play tough D, rebound relentlessly and score at will and that he'll get more touches. In other words, the changing of the guard and shifting of power and reliance from Kidd to Krstic. Kidd's assists should sky feeding Krstic inside who must then kick out to carter or RJ for the easy score if he's overwhelmed and can't score. Bear in mind thought that Krstic can put it up. He's a reliable and effective interior scorer with a nice touch on the outside. He's a very good shooter. Give it to Krstic. Developing Krstic's game will be what this season is about. As Krstic goes, so will go the NETS! :angel:
NBASCOUT2005 said:The defense must key the offense. Also, they'd better learn to play inside out and encourage Krstic to dominate in the post. Few can stop him offensively and involving him that way is better than watching Kidd warm up his own shooting act early in the season. Hope Kidd finishes like Giambi. In the meantime, they've got to tell Krstic that the NETS season rests on his shoulders and ask him to score more, dominate in the post and down low in the paint. They've got to tell Krstic to play tough D, rebound relentlessly and score at will and that he'll get more touches. In other words, the changing of the guard and shifting of power and reliance from Kidd to Krstic. Kidd's assists should sky feeding Krstic inside who must then kick out to carter or RJ for the easy score if he's overwhelmed and can't score. Bear in mind thought that Krstic can put it up. He's a reliable and effective interior scorer with a nice touch on the outside. He's a very good shooter. Give it to Krstic. Developing Krstic's game will be what this season is about. As Krstic goes, so will go the NETS! :angel:
Do you think the players view him in that way? He's relatively young and inexperienced when it comes to coaching in the NBA.NBASCOUT2005 said:Lawrence Frank's biggest challenge is going to be acting the 'tough guy' like a Phil Jackson or Larry Brown can. If not, he'll go the way of JVG - good coach that never won a title!
Yeah...Scalabrine and Upside in the same paragraph was enough to get a giggle out of me too.NetIncome said:I literally laughed out loud at this post. SCALABRINE??? Have you looked at what he is doing...or should I say, NOT doing...with the Celtics. He is averaging 1.9 ppg and 1.1 rpg. He has yet to hit a three and is barely shooting 40% from the floor. The Celtics COMMITTED $15 million to him. HE STINKS. He is a JOKE. No GM other than Ainge, who liked his "brain type", would have given him $15 million. Cliffy: $2.2 million [not $2.5 million] with a team option for $2.3 million next season
vs. Veal: $15 million over five years.
Sad Mafioso said:Do you think the players view him in that way? He's relatively young and inexperienced when it comes to coaching in the NBA.
Anyways it's too early to worry. We started worse last year and then made a run for the playoffs.
What Frank's needs to adress is the role of the players within a "game". Every game is not the same and there are different circumstances but he should draw up a sort of guideline to how they're going to approach the game and different situacions(third quarter droughts, last 5 min etc). It's already clear they're trying to establish Nenad early in the game to give him confidence. Keep feeding him the ball! If Vince or RJ is having and "off night", have either one of them take on a more defensive role.
Intensity, chemistry and committment to the team will make us better in the long run.