just a funny thought I had. I remember when Zach put together his first string of three or four 20/10 nights, and it was a case where you wondered if he was going to come back down to earth, or is that really what you can generally expect of him.
the stat line I listed is what Telfair's averaged over the three games in April. "THREE GAMES?!?!!?" i hear tlong say. "HARDLY statistically meaningful."
well, true. but when you watch him play you don't think, "gosh, he's just lucky." or "gosh, he's just padding his stats." he just looks like he's playing his game the way he's always played it.
is that really what we can expect of our rookie point guard for his career (assuming he improves on the turnover numbers as most PG's do)?
the stat line I listed is what Telfair's averaged over the three games in April. "THREE GAMES?!?!!?" i hear tlong say. "HARDLY statistically meaningful."
well, true. but when you watch him play you don't think, "gosh, he's just lucky." or "gosh, he's just padding his stats." he just looks like he's playing his game the way he's always played it.
is that really what we can expect of our rookie point guard for his career (assuming he improves on the turnover numbers as most PG's do)?