It isn't just Larry Brown who is disgusted by the Knicks' lack of professionalism and pride. Several players expressed similar thoughts during a postgame team meeting that included Brown, Quentin Richardson and Malik Rose, accusing some Knicks of not caring and not competing.
Will it make a difference, I don't know," Rose said. "My gut is, I doubt it to be honest. It's at the point where I have to say something. If it falls on deaf ears so be it."
When asked why his message would fall on deaf ears, Rose added: "Maybe some guys don't want to hear it, some guys don't want to do it. At this point I don't really care. I'm going to do what I can to make this team better. I can't control people's attitudes at this point in the year. They're so set in what we've been doing. If you want to do it that way, do it."
http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/story/406162p-343931c.htmlA majority of the players, led by Marbury, tuned out Brown long ago. Now, players are acting insubordinate toward him and displaying a lack of respect. Players openly talk back to Brown during games or just ignore him completely.
Yet, while their teammates vented, from another corner of the locker room came raucous laughter as Eddy Curry and Maurice Taylor chatted with a couple of friends.
In another corner, Steve Francis said many of the games he's played since joining the Knicks in late February are "like a funeral" and admitted, "Besides my mother passing away when I was 18, this is in the top three" of the worst times he's ever experienced.
http://www.bergen.com/page.php?qstr=eXJpcnk3ZjczN2Y3dnFlZUVFeXkxMjcmZmdiZWw3Zjd2cWVlRUV5eTY5MTE0NzImeXJpcnk3ZjcxN2Y3dnFlZUVFeXk2Rose threw a tantrum walking off the floor after a near-flagrant second-quarter foul by Nate Robinson, who apparently took Brown's words about his questionable decision-making to heart and took just one shot in 26 minutes.Qyntel Woods, whose three turnovers ran his four-game total to 17, snapped at Brown as he walked off the floor in the first half.
why...what did Stephon ever do to you?!! hes a black man getting his reperations...Kitty said:http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/story/406162p-343931c.html
The League should do something about guaranteed contracts. Fire them, and terminate their employment would be satisfying to me in this case. I would love to see the look on Steph's face if his $80 million dollar deal is voided! He couldn't get another deal like that again, that's for sure. Of course, the Union would never go for that!
:krazy:Dragnsmke1 said:why...what did Stephon ever do to you?!! hes a black man getting his reperations...
Dragnsmke1 said:why...what did Stephon ever do to you?!! hes a black man getting his reperations...
:rofl:Dragnsmke1 said:why...what did Stephon ever do to you?!! hes a black man getting his reperations...
hes not the crazy person that gave away all that money...this is exactly what the GM's and managers want...for fans to blame the players and thier contracts when the chips are down instead of thier eneptness in GM'ing and coaching...Rawse said:
He's a black man getting paid to play basketball. Something he's done a poor job of this season.
I promised not to post about Nate going to Seattle anymore, but you brought it up.Gotham2krazy said:This is why we're trading away Mo, Steph, and Nate in the summer. As a matter of fact, right now I'd even throw in Curry to trade away because of that line. Point is, we have a bunch of lackadaisical asses who thinks their contracts are guaranteed. At this point, if I were Zeke, I'd just waive all their asses, like he did with Shandon.
Doing away with guaranteed contracts makes sense in some situations--like Marbury's, for example. But taking that step moves the NBA into the same nasty category as the NFL. You can't know that a player who's having a single bad season is a long-term lump/loser, and if his contract's voided the team will miss out on a fine player who's simply having a tough time in one year.Kitty said:The League should do something about guaranteed contracts. Fire them, and terminate their employment would be satisfying to me in this case. I would love to see the look on Steph's face if his $80 million dollar deal is voided! He couldn't get another deal like that again, that's for sure. Of course, the Union would never go for that!
I'm not blaming Stephon for his big contract. I'm blaming him for his poor play.Dragnsmke1 said:hes not the crazy person that gave away all that money...this is exactly what the GM's and managers want...for fans to blame the players and thier contracts when the chips are down instead of thier eneptness in GM'ing and coaching...
I mean Nate can be traded, but he doesn't have to be traded to Seattle. Unless, if the Sonics were willing to part with either Luke, Rashard, or Earl.WTChan said:I promised not to post about Nate going to Seattle anymore, but you brought it up.
Nevermind.Gotham2krazy said:I mean Nate can be traded, but he doesn't have to be traded to Seattle. Unless, if the Sonics were willing to part with either Luke, Rashard, or Earl.
lol, I mean I would've said Reggie Evans would've done fine, if he was still on the team that is.WTChan said:Nevermind.
urwhatueati8god said:The people with no talent have as much of a right to complain as the ones with no desire.
Yea, I was kinda pulling for something like that, but we got Watson. He's a better fit in Seattle, but he's not from UW. That's basically my only reason I want Nate on the Sonics.Gotham2krazy said:lol, I mean I would've said Reggie Evans would've done fine, if he was still on the team that is.
People with no talent have more right to complain that the people with no desire. At least the talentless ones try.urwhatueati8god said:The people with no talent have as much of a right to complain as the ones with no desire.
They contribute as much or more to the losing than the desireless nonetheless. The fact that Quentin Richardson tries does not excuse him from having a lower eff. per 48 than Howard Eisley.WTChan said:People with no talent have more right to complain that the people with no desire. At least the talentless ones try.