Not really, but he would be easier to move than Jamison. I don't know the numbers off hand, but his contract isn't as long is it? I think that it would be Nash trying to get chips to deal later more than anything when it comes to trading Rasheed Wallace.Originally posted by <b>Scinos</b>!
I can't really understand the logic of getting SAR for Sheed. Basically, it still leaves Portland with 3 PF's up front with DD, Zach and SAR. Only this trio would be worse defensively. From what i've seen, Shareef is not a SF. He likes to go to the basket and play in the paint. How is he going to open up the paint for Zach ?
SAR is similar to Jamison. They are both 3/4 tweeners, they put up similar stats (when Jamison was with Golden State), both solid rebounders and they both play really bad defense. You guys hated the Jamison idea, yet you think SAR is a good return ? :uhoh: