Northwestern was involved? Must be a good student which is good news. I know they were waiting for some kids to qualify but won't have worries with this kid.
Max Power said:Beasley has verbaled, but he won't be here until 2007.
Scratch what Max? Is he no longer coming, or coming next year, not sure what you mean.Max Power said:scratch that.
Both, Hill was our DC/Bmore connection. Moxley used to work the Juco circuit for us and Benny Moss was our southern guy. We've now lost 2 of those 3. We were still looking at some good jucos, so that hadnt fallen off too badly.Mattjb34 said:would you say that a large part is b/c of Hill or mostly Lutz?
Throw out a number between 90-100% and you've got it. Still, our ramp up was built upon 2007 being a special season for us, with Beasely as the centerpiece of a young, athletic team with a good deal of talent and a senior PG.km109 said:For Niner fans, what were the chances that Beasley was 1 year and done?
I find that comment to be borderline ridiculous. As you said, Huggins has a lot of baggage from his players getting into trouble to he himself getting into trouble to his players not graduating, the list goes on. And you think that Temple should overlook all of this why? Because they need to build a basketball program? I just don't see how rising back to prominence is more important than making sure that the person that most visibly represents your university is someone you can be proud of and will represent the university well. Is Jim Harrick available?floodzone said:I'm sorry I think this is just one of many reasons Temple should have strongly considered Huggins. you know he is gonna kill it in recruiting. yeah he has baggage but the need for temple to rise back to prominence overrides that. I thought it would have been a great fit.