Professional and College Basketball Forums banner

Hypothetical question regarding Amare

639 Views 19 Replies 14 Participants Last post by  Starbury03
Amare was wise enough to sign a max extension last summer. However, imagine if he didn't extend, and was a RFA this offseason. Given what's happened this season, if you were an NBA GM would you sign him, and how much would you be willing to offer? Would he still get the max?
1 - 20 of 20 Posts
id most deff. take him, but maybe not a max deal though. A decent one, but a max deal IMHO would be too much to gamble

Also i would take into consideration what team i was the GM of and what pieces i needed to build a team.
I'd sign him for as much as it takes. Technology has become much much better, the surgery isn't as harsh as it was, he's young, and a beast. Hell yeah I'd still take him...
I wouldn't touch him. Could be another Allan Houston.
S-Star said:
I'd sign him for as much as it takes. Technology has become much much better, the surgery isn't as harsh as it was, he's young, and a beast. Hell yeah I'd still take him...

Penny hardway done gotted a max deal.
Even if he comes back less explosive, people underestimate Amare Stoudemire's skills and talent. He has a really good touch out to 15 feet, is a solid 6'11 and doesn't need to put on weight at all, he is built. Even without the great explosiveness, he would be a really good player.

So inking him to a max deal would be worth it. Your worst case scenario is getting an 18/8 player who is only 22 year old, and best case is obviously getting a dominant 28/11 big man to be the face of your franchise.

I would max him out if he was a free agent.
I agree with patchwork, even if he losses his explosiveness and his hops. He is still a big body out there, he will always have his upper body strenght, worst case scenario I would develop him into an Alonzo type player(late Alonzo that is). He is still a big body that could bang inside and hit occassional 15 footers. As far as a max deal, why not if Kwame Brown gets 10 mil a year why not a broken down Amare which still would be better.
osprey said:
I agree with patchwork, even if he losses his explosiveness and his hops. He is still a big body out there, he will always have his upper body strenght, worst case scenario I would develop him into an Alonzo type player(late Alonzo that is). He is still a big body that could bang inside and hit occassional 15 footers. As far as a max deal, why not if Kwame Brown gets 10 mil a year why not a broken down Amare which still would be better.
Worst case scenario he can't play anymore and has to retire and you still have to pay him. That is what is risky about it.
Sir Patchwork said:
Even if he comes back less explosive, people underestimate Amare Stoudemire's skills and talent. He has a really good touch out to 15 feet, is a solid 6'11 and doesn't need to put on weight at all, he is built. Even without the great explosiveness, he would be a really good player.

So inking him to a max deal would be worth it. Your worst case scenario is getting an 18/8 player who is only 22 year old, and best case is obviously getting a dominant 28/11 big man to be the face of your franchise.

I would max him out if he was a free agent.
Worst case scenario is 18/8 while averaging 20 games a year and has 5 surgeries during the contract. Look at Hill and Hardaway.
I'd take him no doubt.
..

Knowing exactly what we know now ... if I were a GM this summer I wouldn't sign him to the max. Having an in and out of the lineup type guy who could end up just being another good PF instead of a great PF for the max could be disastrous to a franchise. Although I have no doubt he'd find at least 1 taker for the max. Someone would sign him, no doubt.
Depends. Is my franchise in the pits and been there for the past decade? Am I the Atlanta Hawks or Golden State Warriors? In that case, yes. If it doesn't work out, yes it would hinder further rebuilding but it wouldn't make things worse. If it does work out, my team is relevant again.
I would start Amare out with a 2 year contract first. If he still puts up monster numbers, then I would give him the max. If he plays mediocre and misses a lot of time, then no.
Well, someone would give him the max, so saying you would give them X amount or a 2 year contract is the same as just saying no you wouldn't sign him.
iverson101 said:
Well, someone would give him the max, so saying you would give them X amount or a 2 year contract is the same as just saying no you wouldn't sign him.

I'm not saying I wouldn't, but why give Amare the max right away and then he blows his knee out again and you're stuck paying him all that money while he sits on the bench?
D.J. said:
I'm not saying I wouldn't, but why give Amare the max right away and then he blows his knee out again and you're stuck paying him all that money while he sits on the bench?
Because if you give Amare the max right away and then he doesn't blow his knee out again and becomes the most dominant player in the NBA, you have an elite NBA team for the next 10 years. That's why.
iverson101 said:
Because if you give Amare the max right away and then he doesn't blow his knee out again and becomes the most dominant player in the NBA, you have an elite NBA team for the next 10 years. That's why.

Once you have a major knee injury, your knee is very weak and you are more likely to injure it again. Amare's knee injury most likely shortened his career by a couple of years.
D.J. said:
Once you have a major knee injury, your knee is very weak and you are more likely to injure it again. Amare's knee injury most likely shortened his career by a couple of years.
Pure speculation. Some people say he is going to be 100% back to normal and be fine, others say he's completely done for. Neither have any idea. The only people that might actually have a clue are the trained doctors that are working on his knee. Even then, they can't know anything 100%.
D.J. said:
I'm not saying I wouldn't, but why give Amare the max right away and then he blows his knee out again and you're stuck paying him all that money while he sits on the bench?
It doesn't matter if its not logical to give him the max... someone would do it. Getting him for a two year is a pipe dream.
I would give Amare a max deal for 3 years. I wouldn't want to give him a 6 year deal, because one year to get over the injury and the next to show that he is back from the injury. Then if it didnt work out and his knee was messed up you could trade him during his last year.
1 - 20 of 20 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top