Joined
·
123 Posts
I have heard many rumors that Z will be next does anyone want him to go and if you do who for?
I share the same viewpoint. But if Z does in fact leave, I'd rather see Jamison than AR because Jamison seems more of a 3 to me (while Shareef can easily swing over).Originally posted by <b>futuristxen</b>!
I'd like to get either Abdur Rahim or Jamison plus a little filler maybe.
Yeah I've been warming more and more to the idea of getting Jamison. The more I think about it the more I think he could be the perfect fit.Originally posted by <b>remy23</b>!
I share the same viewpoint. But if Z does in fact leave, I'd rather see Jamison than AR because Jamison seems more of a 3 to me (while Shareef can easily swing over).
Z is hurt/injuried alot. Although he is extremely talented. But a near all-star player for him is asking alot. What playoff team would gamble like that unless they have alot of other weapons?Originally posted by <b>futuristxen</b>!
I'll say this though, I liked the Ricky Davis trade, I understood the Miles trade...but if they trade Z for more role players I will go insane.
Z should net a near all-star level player. That's the bottom line. You don't just give away centers of his skill for crap. I know he doesn't fit in Cleveland. But the Cavs can play with him for as long as it takes to find a good deal. They are dealing him from a position of power. It's not like they can't use the extra scoring and post presence right now.
So it better be somebody like Jamison.
He's been healthy for like two years now. He gets injured less than Penny Hardaway and he's a center.Originally posted by <b>Petey</b>!
Z is hurt/injuried alot. Although he is extremely talented. But a near all-star player for him is asking alot. What playoff team would gamble like that unless they have alot of other weapons?
With that, Jamison would seem like a fit, if the Mavs wanted Z. But don't know about the Hawks. They are already a poor team. What if they traded one of their more durable players like Shareef for Z, and Z went down? They would be more then horrible for the duration of Z's contract (the next 2 years).
-Petey
-Petey
He may get injuried less then Penny, but the Knicks took on Penny to get Marbury. You trading off Z's bad contract with LeBron?Originally posted by <b>futuristxen</b>!
He's been healthy for like two years now. He gets injured less than Penny Hardaway and he's a center.
If you're dallas he would be the perfect guy to add to the team. He does rebound and block shots. And he can dominate Divac and give trouble to Shaq with his offense. He's the best guy they could get to fill their hole in the middle.
Z's contract ends next season.Originally posted by <b>Petey</b>!
He may get injuried less then Penny, but the Knicks took on Penny to get Marbury. You trading off Z's bad contract with LeBron?
-Petey
I realize that. But Z's contract is still a max contract... and that is a good thing for a guy of his durability?Originally posted by <b>TyGuy</b>!
Z's contract ends next season.
I would rather have Z on the team right now..over some liar..with NO integrity. :yes:Anything so you have the money to match on Carlos Boozer. Otherwise you just lost your 2nd best player and future all-star. Nice.
this is businessOriginally posted by <b>Cleveland Browns</b>!
I would rather have Z on the team right now..over some liar..with NO integrity. :yes: