Pretty much. Do you want Davis for 60 games or Hinrich for 77?LuckyAC said:Actually the argument is skill of B. Davis vs. health of Hinrich, but I'd go with Davis.
This is an uninformed comment.BenGordon said:Hinrich's defense is often overrated
What?H.O.V.A. said:Baron Davis for now. I still don't think we've seen the best of Hinrich. If he could raise his shooting percentages, this comparison would be a little more even.
Nonsense.Pioneer10 said:The only reason not to go Davis would be health otherwise he is clearly a better player. Hinrich can barely get the nod to start at PG for his own team
At the current time, Hinrich's PER is 21.1. Davis' is 19.7. Hinrich shows a trend of improved efficiency when scoring. Davis shows the opposite.Pioneer10 said:What the hell are you talking about VV; Baron Davis AVERAGE PER is 17.8
Hinrich's still just in his third season. That said, in KH's third season he's currently besting Davis' average by 3.4 points.Kirk has never had one season where he was better then Davis's average.
I don't necessarily disagree with this statement.The only reason anyone can make a legitimate argument for Hinrich is Davis' health history not performance