Lets make it 5 in a row babyyyyyy!!!!
http://www.usatoday.com/sports/scores104/104039/20040208NBA--NEWYORK---0.htm
http://www.usatoday.com/sports/scores104/104039/20040208NBA--NEWYORK---0.htm
Today is Sunday and we also beat the Pacers, who are far from a sub .500 team.Originally posted by <b>Rashidi</b>!
Saturday night. Some of us non-Rashidi people have lives.
Nice to see Thomas outgunned Brand. Rasheed who?
Another win, another sub .500 team. Let's see if the Knicks can actually beat the Mavericks this time.
Sorry. I have been busy today, so I could not talk about Stephon Marbury's godliness. 42 and 8? That is insane.Originally posted by <b>Fordy74</b>!
Marbury goes off for 42 points. Kurt Thomas adds 28 in the knicks win! Why isnt anyone talking about it?
Eh, just another so so performance from a couple of our "over-rated" players.Originally posted by <b>Fordy74</b>!
Marbury goes off for 42 points. Kurt Thomas adds 28 in the knicks win! Why isnt anyone talking about it?
Thomas: 12-19 from the field, and the win.But I'm curious how Kurt Thomas outgunned Brand?
Brand - 7/11 - 64% - 28 pts - 6 rbs - 3 ast - 3 stl - 1 BS
Thomas - 12/19 - 63% - 28pts - 6 rbs - 1 ast - 0 stl - 0 BS
Seems pretty even to me; if not the advantage going to Brand.
KT will probably follow this up with another 6 point performance. He pretty much always does. Not a lick of consistency in his offensive game.Eh, just another so so performance from a couple of our "over-rated" players.
"My boy" Eisley is still better than Moochie Norris. I thought you were over Eisley by now. Still can't remember how many turnovers Frank Williams commits? Likely.boy EISLY sukkkked....
When you say era, do you mean the next 2 seasons? After that we'll enter another new era, an era where all the high priced vets stop producing due to age/injury. Sounds fun.Its a NEW era...
Over the last 3-4 years Walt Frazier, you know the hall of famer who telecasts almost everygame with Marv, has routinely referred to Thomas as the most consistent Knick. Unless you've got a stat sheet to prove otherwise I'll take his word over yours.Originally posted by <b>Rashidi</b>!
KT will probably follow this up with another 6 point performance. He pretty much always does. Not a lick of consistency in his offensive game.
It probably won't be any worse than the years of lottery under Layden, when the high priced vets were young/healthy but stopped producing. It was assuredly not fun.When you say era, do you mean the next 2 seasons? After that we'll enter another new era, an era where all the high priced vets stop producing due to age/injury. Sounds fun.
At some point you should give some consideration to WHO is "over rating" Kurt.Originally posted by <b>Rashidi</b>!
KT will probably follow this up with another 6 point performance. He pretty much always does. Not a lick of consistency in his offensive game.
NOW I'm worried about the future? Considering I've only been talking about it the last 6 weeks, you sure are a bit SLOW. The team also had VUJANIC and LAMPE (and like it or not, Frank WIlliams and Mike Sweetney were playing more). The Knicks would have been better for the future BY DISPLAYING PATIENCE (something silly NYers like yourself know little of) and RIDING OUT the contracts. Get a ****ing memory bank if you're only going to remember whatever happened in the last 2 weeks, Captain Short Term. At least we know WHY you're so in favor of giving up on the long term, it's because you can't remember anything long term.Oh,and NOW you are worried about the future??You never wanted to Rebuild...
Ok, maybe you don't have a bad memory. Maybe you just like to REWRITE HISTORY.Rashidi arent you the guy who enjoyed the "success" of layden and co and was happy with .333 winning % and not playing the rookies??
Eisley was the PG of the present. This concept sure is tough on you.werent you the big supporter of Eisly our point guard of the future...
Because nuking the team won't get it anywhere. I was in favor of riding out contracts and letting them expire.You were never in favor of NUKING the knicks.
Naively thought? You had the same thoughts at the beginning of the season, clown. I did not say the Knicks would go deep into the postseason. I said they would get the 8th seed. Given the mess that is the east, they probably would be.You thought this was a playoff team .How would a team run by layden and Chaney,that you naively thought could get ino the playoffs despite a .333 winning percentage
1. For once? LMAO.have a future assuming you were right for once and they did squeak in??
Does this mean you think I'm affiliated with the Knicks? Or is this another personal attack? I don't get it. Or is this confirmation that you really do believe I'm Shandon Anderson. God bless you, child.Layden,Chaney,Eisly and rashidi= NO FUTURE