well, jackson refused to coach the nets and kobe refused to play for the nets when the nets were, um, not good. so, i think that might say something about how sure they are of themselves.Originally posted by Fordy74
Its just like the curiosity of what kind of coach Phil Jackson is. How good is Kobe without Shaq? How good of a coach would Jackson be with a ridiulosuly stacked roster. Has he even coached a team that was above average? Dont think he has even coached a team that was above average only elite. never mind a mediocre or a bad team.
This is Ho-away isn't it? I can just tell by this post. What's up Ho!Originally posted by Penny Hardaway
Depends man, T-Mac chokes when it counts but Peny wannbe is proven he can take a scrub team to playoff contender but Kobe? The sidekick of the century who gets his points here and there. lol, watch the finals, Kobe forced some drives and dunk which aren't necessary at all! Man, don't force things, no matter what you do, you are a good sidekick!
I'd take Kobe over Pierce for the exact same reason. He choked in the playoffsOriginally posted by KiDcRaWfOrD
Defiantely T-Mac. I would also take Paul Pierce over Kobe as well. Even though he choked in the playoffs....
yeah, I remember those shots fondly. I am no real fan of Kobe's. HeheheOriginally posted by KiDcRaWfOrD
Well, it was Paul's first experience in the playoffs. Remember, Kobe struggled at first too(airball against Utah). It takes awhile to build up playoff savy.
Pierce is more talented IMO....
everyone's life crappy? or just make mine even crappier? lolOriginally posted by cocopuffz
hi locagata. ahhhaah.. now im here to make everyones life crappy hahha..