blazerboy30 said:
I would be in favor of having a team full of players who will do whatever it takes to win, whether it is putting aside personal stats, making the extra pass, diving for loose balls, and this sort of play.
Do you think maybe we could trade Zach for a guy like that? Maybe we could get Malik Rose? I've heard Denver is shoping Eduardo Najera. You think we could get a hold of Mark Madsen?
Point being you need talent. You can't win without talent. You'd prefer to have hard working guys rather than guys that don't work hard but talent is more important. Your odds of winning are better if you start with a talented guys and work on their deficiencies(sp?) than you are if you go with hard workers and hope that over time they can develop talent.
The behavior that zach displayed, by joking after a loss just goes along with what I, and many other fans believe is a major problem on this team.........too much emphasis on personal stats, and not caring enough about winning the game.
Well I believe that Zach, like many other professional atheletes, is simply not that bright. So it's entirely possible that he was distracted by something shiny and thought of something funny to say that wasn't related to the loss.
I don't want the guy to do my taxes or watch the wall so prisoners don't escape. He doesn't need to be a genius. And he doesn't need to be constantly vigilant.
There's something we all need to focus on when it comes to Zach. Zach Randolph is an offensive beast. If you get him the ball in good position he'll put it in the basket. If it doesn't go into the basket he'll get it back and make sure it goes into the basket the second time. Some times that transfers to the defensive end and when it does it is quite a site to behold.
I believe Shaquille O'neal put it best after a game where he had something like 7 shot attempts and was criticized for his lack of defensive intensity. "If you don't feed the dog, the dog won't guard the yard." This is true of most NBA players. If they don't get their chance to score it negatively effects the rest of their game. This goes double for big men because they depend on guards to get them the ball and are often charged with a greater defensive burden.
I'm not saying that Zach will turn into Ben Wallace if we give him enough touches but it will up his intensity on both ends of the floor. I'd rather he had that intensity to start with. But he doesn't. So it's up to management and the other players to help him get to the necessary level of intensity.
also, in my opinion, joking in the locker room after a loss is NOT considered an "off court imperfection." i believe this to be a HUGE flaw and problem on this team, not a personallity imperfection.
You may be 100% correct here. But if so then this is a HUGE flaw that lots of NBA players share. 82 games is a lot of games. Most players don't put enough value into most regular season games to get upset when they lose one.
i believe that once teams become "ok" with losing, that team will spend a long, long time at the bottom of the league. things will only change when losing becomes unacceptable.
f'shizzle. But I don't think this necessarily indicates that Zach is "ok" with losing. Lots of people take stress differently. Some folks get all huffy and some folks crack jokes. But the crappy part is that the huffy folks never understand the folks that crack jokes. And eventually the crack jokes types get suck of the huffy folks talking **** and that's how a guy like Zach ends up punching a guy like Ruben Patterson in the face.