Again, you show your ability to twist and misstate things. I never said what she should do. I said I was interested in why she did not, and that I would have. Stop grasping at straws and making stuff up.
2 bottom lines here: (1) You have an axe to grind with UVM and have already concluded that they did exactly what the lawsuit says they did, and (2) if they did do this, I think everyone here agrees they should be held fully accountable (and Lamb should be as well if he did what he is accused of). The difference between you and me is that I believe in the rule of law and the process, whereas you do not.
As an add-on to that, it is not accusing someone of gold digging to clean out some prick who raped you or to do the same to an institution that covered it up. In that event, they both deserve it, and the victim deserves to be compensated as best the law will allow, which in a civil lawsuit in generally monetary damages. Furthermore, the rapist deserves to be charged criminally. To me, that would have even more of a chilling effect on other potential rapists than a money award.
Note: Edited to fix a typo