AnDrOiDKing4 said:You must of forget about Shaq when you were making this thread , right ?
And if you're starting to compare Amare to Malone...then that's why Nash should be MVPSith said:this is getting really ridicious. pipe it down, nash homers....
so in ur theory, john stockton was a more valueable player than karl malone? it just seems like it's the same with nash and amare stoudmire.
lol, all u guys sound like Amare was a scrub, nash made him the star he is today.... i dont even wanna argue, but people who watch suns basketball knows Amare is a dominant monster himself, with or without nash.VCFSO2000 said:And if you're starting to compare Amare to Malone...then that's why Nash should be MVP