his shot was off. tracy was on tonight. VC has nights like that too. VC isn't going to score less than 20 points on very many nights. BTW, did you check out Paul Pierce's stats on the same night as VC's game? VC is playing a LOT better D and sharing the ball much more effectively.Originally posted by <b>JL2002</b>!
I know ppl will shoot at me bout this thread....but seriously, Vince, at least get 20 pts a game....6-23 in the bulls game are quite unacceptable after going 4-6 in the first. that means he went 2-17 in 3 whole quarters. I don't think everyone expects to see 27ppg from him any longer, but at least get 17-20pts with an acceptable fg% and some assists to go with it....
I was alright with Vince when he's getting about 20ppg and 5-6apg after the bulls trade. I thought they shared the ball well, but now the whole team is lifeless.
I don't think it may so much be "softness" that is wrong with Vince.Originally posted by <b>Slasher</b>!
Vince is a softie. Tracy is a warrior.
If Vince drove the ball more inside, he could do the same thing; but unfortunately for us Vince is scared to get his skin scraped while driving inside.
did you even watch the game? tmac was just camping outside the arc. with new defenses tmac is also driving through the lane MUCH less. the commentators were talking about that reluctance much of the time he was in the game.Originally posted by <b>Slasher</b>!
Vince is a softie. Tracy is a warrior.
If Vince drove the ball more inside, he could do the same thing; but unfortunately for us Vince is scared to get his skin scraped while driving inside.
Why would anyone care about individual talent? According to my knowledge, I think every REAL fan of their respective team cares about the WHOLE TEAM'S talent.Originally posted by <b>SPMJ</b>!
T-mac is twice the player VC is. I watched VC the other day against the Bulls......and seriously, he's at least two levels below Mcgrady's league(consisting only of KG, TD, healthy Kobe and Shaq).
wow, gotta say, that's a pretty weak decision on your part.Originally posted by <b>Milla</b>!
People, relax. I think he was just trying to prove a point that VC's shot selection is poor and he is not hitting many jumpers. I'm sorry but you guys have to admit, regardless of team standings, that T-Mac IS a way better player than Vince. For a game-winning basket, I would rather pass the ball to T-Mac if he is triple-teamed, than to Vince if he is left open.
I agree, you must really not remember all the clutch shots that Vince has drained, all the game winners too.Originally posted by <b>SkywalkerAC</b>!
wow, gotta say, that's a pretty weak decision on your part.
I'm sorry to admit this, but Tmac is in a more different and harder circumstance than Vince, because the pressure is more on his shoulders than Vince so therefore, he has to play extra harder while Vince can lay back, since he has a supportive teammate. Think about it for a minute, before you say "you hate Tmac since you're always on Vince's bandwagon"Originally posted by <b>Milla</b>!
People, relax. I think he was just trying to prove a point that VC's shot selection is poor and he is not hitting many jumpers. I'm sorry but you guys have to admit, regardless of team standings, that T-Mac IS a way better player than Vince. For a game-winning basket, I would rather pass the ball to T-Mac if he is triple-teamed, than to Vince if he is left open.
yes, and how many game winning baskets has TMac let in this season?Originally posted by <b>Milla</b>!
People, relax. I think he was just trying to prove a point that VC's shot selection is poor and he is not hitting many jumpers. I'm sorry but you guys have to admit, regardless of team standings, that T-Mac IS a way better player than Vince. For a game-winning basket, I would rather pass the ball to T-Mac if he is triple-teamed, than to Vince if he is left open.